Jump to content

New threads as personal attacks.  

21 members have voted

  1. 1. Is starting a new thread as a personal attack too much.

    • Yes. It's crap.
      13
    • Cugalbanana's an idiot.
      11


Recommended Posts

Posted
15 minutes ago, row_33 said:

The concern for 9/11 for all libs was that people might think this reflects bad on a certain religion of peace 

 

 

 

Someone might get the wrong idea.....

 

 

I'll be a little more direct. It does reflect on the Islamic faith because of the preponderance of instances of terror associated with Muslims, and the amount of tacit approval by the mainstream and their clergy.

Posted
6 hours ago, Foxx said:

religion of peace?? is that like an oxymoron?

 

Not at all! Though the next 'religion of peace' will be the first one, oddly enough.

Posted

Douche replaced faggot when faggot was ruled politically incorrect. Out of fear of being chastised by faggots, people started calling faggots douche bags. I once even saw some faggot use the word "douchey". 

 

It's just a reminder that evolution isn't always progress. And sometimes when language evolves to the point that you stop calling a fag a fag, you realize one day that you're surrounded by silly little liberals, who live to force their faggotism on you and everyone else. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

Douche replaced faggot when faggot was ruled politically incorrect. Out of fear of being chastised by faggots, people started calling faggots douche bags. I once even saw some faggot use the word "douchey". 

 

It's just a reminder that evolution isn't always progress. And sometimes when language evolves to the point that you stop calling a fag a fag, you realize one day that you're surrounded by silly little liberals, who live to force their faggotism on you and everyone else. 

Why such animous against a bundle of sticks?

Posted
28 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

Douche replaced faggot when faggot was ruled politically incorrect. Out of fear of being chastised by faggots, people started calling faggots douche bags. I once even saw some faggot use the word "douchey". 

 

It's just a reminder that evolution isn't always progress. And sometimes when language evolves to the point that you stop calling a fag a fag, you realize one day that you're surrounded by silly little liberals, who live to force their faggotism on you and everyone else. 

 

You're cool

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Rob's House said:

Douche replaced faggot when faggot was ruled politically incorrect. Out of fear of being chastised by faggots, people started calling faggots douche bags. I once even saw some faggot use the word "douchey". 

 

It's just a reminder that evolution isn't always progress. And sometimes when language evolves to the point that you stop calling a fag a fag, you realize one day that you're surrounded by silly little liberals, who live to force their faggotism on you and everyone else. 

I still call a fag a fag.  Not like a gay fag. I don't have a problem with gays, I just have a problem with fags.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

I still call a fag a fag.  Not like a gay fag. I don't have a problem with gays, I just have a problem with fags.

 

So you're anti-smoking?

Posted
Just now, Koko78 said:

 

So you're anti-smoking?

i very much want to post a picture i have.

 

imagine, if you will, two men positioned strategically with part of the picture censored to reflect a cigarette being smoked by his close friend.

Posted
21 hours ago, Koko78 said:

 

So you're anti-smoking?

The last time a fag was in my mouth I was super gay. Like, so gay.  My homosexual friend beside me was also gay. 

Posted

Kind of a play on the old, "If the law is on your side, argue the law; if the facts are on your side, etc."  In our case when neither fit the moment, we often choose to attack the proponent of whatever we don't agree with, eh? You know, like politicians.

Posted
1 hour ago, Keukasmallie said:

Kind of a play on the old, "If the law is on your side, argue the law; if the facts are on your side, etc."  In our case when neither fit the moment, we often choose to attack the proponent of whatever we don't agree with, eh? You know, like politicians.

 

more like this brilliant work....

 

https://monoskop.org/images/7/7b/Sloterdijk_Peter_Critique_of_Cynical_Reason.pdf

 

he captured all the nuance even over 30 years ago, it's now what he predicted..... 

 

 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Well, this is kind of an attack, or a snub really. 

 

McCain isn't even dead yet and he has made it clear he doesn't want the POS Trump there. 

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/07/orrin-hatch-john-mccain-funeral-trump-invite-572681

Quote

 

Sen. John McCain should reconsider his wish that President Donald Trump not attend McCain's funeral, said Sen. Orrin Hatch, the most senior GOP senator.

McCain prefers instead that Vice President Mike Pence attend his funeral rather than Trump, who has mocked McCain for being tortured and attacked him for voting against Obamacare repeal. But Hatch said he thought keeping the president from his funeral was too much: "I think it's ridiculous."

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...