Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

 

He isn’t top 5 for me either but after pouring through all the stats it’s not crazy to make the case he is top 10-15 guy

 

his versatility was unmatched... even Faulk couldn’t block like him . He was a modern 3rd down back combined with the speed, power , vision of a workhorse 

 

 

 

By my account he is #9 for RB not 12... who are the other 3 you found ahead of him 

 

Payton, Smith, Faulk, Sproles, Tomlinson, Sanders, Walker, Gore, Allen, Martin, T. Barber

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Gugny said:

 

Payton, Smith, Faulk, Sproles, Tomlinson, Sanders, Walker, Gore, Allen, Martin, T. Barber

 

Was that single season or career?

Sproles isn't ahead career, neither is barber

Edited by SouthNYfan
Posted
1 minute ago, SouthNYfan said:

 

Was that single season or career?

Sproles isn't ahead career, neither is barber

 

Yea he must of went single season

 

he is ahead of both

Posted
1 minute ago, Buffalo716 said:

 

Yea, that’s is all purpose yards which is a bit different than yards from scrimmage 

 

and you are allowed your own opinion!

 

I love Thurman as much as any Bills fan.  Kelly, too.  And he's not in my top 10 for QBs, either.

Posted
Just now, SouthNYfan said:

 

Ahhh yes.

All purpose vs from scrimmage

All purpose includes kick/punt returns, int returns/fumble rec too I think

 

Yes. That’s the difference 

 

return yards and such

Posted
Just now, SouthNYfan said:

 

Ahhh yes.

All purpose vs from scrimmage

All purpose includes kick/punt returns, int returns/fumble rec too I think

 

I took out the return specialists and thought I kept it to actual RBs.

Posted
Just now, Gugny said:

 

I love Thurman as much as any Bills fan.  Kelly, too.  And he's not in my top 10 for QBs, either.

 

I think both are obviously awesome... both are HoF

 

but Thurman was more dominant imo I think there is a better case for Thurman top 10 than Kelly

1 minute ago, Gugny said:

 

I took out the return specialists and thought I kept it to actual RBs.

 

Sproles hasn’t over 10,000 career return yards to put him there

Posted
10 hours ago, Happy Gilmore said:

 

Plus...he was one of the few (maybe the only back) that took the snap directly and ran through the 'A' Gap.  I don't think too many backs do that even now.  Thurman was multi talented, maybe not a 'flashy' runner, but a very effective one...in multiple facets.

 

The wildcat offense?

Posted (edited)

I hope you guys are figuring in TT post season yardage into his record. It is relevant and certainly took a toll on his body playing 19-20 games a year every year. He was so...versatile and perfect for any offense that wanted balance. I haven't analyzed the record, but off the top of my head, having seen all his games, and watching football for 40 years, he is a top 10 guy and no worse than top 15 for sure.

Edited by horned dogs
Posted
11 hours ago, NoSaint said:

Top 10 all time? I’ll say no... 

 

Top 20-25? Sure

 

juice, brown, Campbell, Walter, sayers,  Dickerson, sanders, LT, Faulk and Peterson off hand... I’m sure I forget 2-3 that could be in the 10

Thurman was as good as Tomlinson and Faulk. Peterson had a different style and not as skilled a receiver as Thurman. I think E. Smith benefited from playing behind maybe the greatest line ever for at least 5-6 years of his career. Also Smith had a relatively injury free career that allowed him to pile up yards.

Posted
11 hours ago, NoSaint said:

Top 10 all time? I’ll say no... 

 

Top 20-25? Sure

 

juice, brown, Campbell, Walter, sayers,  Dickerson, sanders, LT, Faulk and Peterson off hand... I’m sure I forget 2-3 that could be in the 10

Sorry, LT, Faulk and Peterson are not as good as Thurman. I’m not even sure why this has to be said.

Posted
11 hours ago, Buffalo716 said:

I argued that Thurman is overlooked in the world of modern running backs and is a top 10 RB in NFL history...

 

sure he didn’t dazzle like Barry or churn out 5 yard runs at a whack like Emmitt... but he was the most complete back of his time... 

 

his running, receiving, blocking and toughness made him the most rounded back of his Era

 

his power / speed ratio was the best in the NFL and he was a violent runner

 

led the NFL in yards from scrimmage an NFL record 4 consecutive seasons... an NFL MVP... a first ballot HoF

 

As a student of the game I don’t find it foolish to say Thurman is a top 10 modern back

 

 

What really made Thurman a hall of famer was the way he could do everything and did everything. Just as you say. 

 

He was sort of like Marshall Faulk  before most of any were using a RB like that. 

 

i remember I was at a game ...  a long time ago, and he ran a 9 or wheel. Made a diving catch where he was virtually parallel to the ground on a deep sideline ball. Few WRs could do that. Guy was a stud. 

Posted
53 minutes ago, Gugny said:

 

I took out the return specialists and thought I kept it to actual RBs.

 

Yeah, but the actual term "yards from scrimmage" and "all purpose yards" differ, regardless of position.

 

Ez mistake.

I actually have made it myself when looking these things up :)

Posted
1 minute ago, SouthNYfan said:

 

Yeah, but the actual term "yards from scrimmage" and "all purpose yards" differ, regardless of position.

 

Ez mistake.

I actually have made it myself when looking these things up :)

 

Whether he's a top 10 of all-time RB, or not, I think (hope) everyone can agree that his place in Canton is certainly well-deserved.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Wacka said:

Not going to read the whole thread, but Smith's career lasted longer because he ran out of bounds a lot instead of turning it up field and getting hit.

I think you mean Thurman Thomas.

Posted
28 minutes ago, Gugny said:

 

Whether he's a top 10 of all-time RB, or not, I think (hope) everyone can agree that his place in Canton is certainly well-deserved.

 

Damn right.

×
×
  • Create New...