Jump to content

Trade QB Poll

PrimeTime101
 Share

Where do you want to trade to?   

131 members have voted

  1. 1. How far are you willing to go to trade

    • All the way. any draft picks it takes to get to #2 with Giants
      52
    • Two first rounders for the #5 pick
      42
    • Jump just a little bit to #10 and loose maybe a third and a fourth round?
      14
    • do you want to go the other direction and trade to maybe 15th - 17th pick and get more capital?
      1
    • We waited to see what Giants did at #2 and they did NOT choose a QB so we stay at 12 thinking a top 4 QB will fall to us
      22

Recommended Posts

MTBill Rookie

MTBill

Posted
Posted

I'm all in on playing it by ear - and not worrying about the GIants/Jets - targeting a spot further down (4th-11th).  I am not willing to mortgage the future to the Giants for a marginally better prospect - to me the drop off is not as precipitous as the frenzy suggests.  Looking at all of the prospects - there is no sure thing according to anyone, there are 6 good prospects who all have about the same odds to be a bust or a HOF QB.

snamsnoops Veteran

snamsnoops

Posted
Posted

I don't care for any of the choices. The draft will change a lot of things after that first pick. I would be willing to part with 3 firsts to get the guy they want. Which doesn't necessarily mean getting to # 2.

  • Like (+1) 1
Tatonka68 RFA

Tatonka68

Posted
Posted (edited)

Depends who the Browns take at #1. If they do not draft Darnold, go all out with Giants for 2 and draft Darnold.

If Browns take Darnold, stay at #12 and draft Mason Rudolph and a OL or ILB at #22.

 

Mayfield, Rosen and Allen are not worth the value to trade up.

Edited by Tatonka68
  • Like (+1) 3
RyanC883 Hall of Famer

RyanC883

Posted
Posted

I guess this poll would have to be phrased as, "we do it now, before the draft."  Otherwise, depends on what Cleveland and others do.  

 

This will be the most exciting draft (at least for Bills fans) that I can recall.  

VirginiaMike RFA

VirginiaMike

Posted
Posted

The Bills need to use this draft capital to shore up a WEAK O-Line.  The Bills lost their two best O-Linemen in Wood & Richie.  Without getting someone who can play in those positions (not journeymen they have used at the line like Mills and DuClasse (sp?)) is critical to have any success.  We also have a big need at WR and LB to fill.  

  • Like (+1) 1
MikeSpeed RFA

MikeSpeed

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 4/13/2018 at 4:20 PM, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said:

 

Trouble is  the odds are about the same at getting a bust or a franchise QB

Expand  

And the alternative is drafting OL, DL, WR... and finishing every season around 8-8 and never having a high enough draft pick to get the best QB. Wash rinse repeat. I'd trade it all every year until I have found "the guy".

Edited by MikeSpeed
Kwai San Veteran

Kwai San

Posted
Posted
  On 4/13/2018 at 4:24 PM, MikeSpeed said:

And the alternative is drafting OL, DL, WR... and finishing every season around 8-8 and never having a high enough draft pick to get the best QB. Wash rinse repeat. I'd trade it all every year until I have found "the guy".

Expand  

 

Right - at some point The Bills need that guy.....they will continually circle the drain until THAT guy is in a Bills uni.

maryland-bills-fan Veteran

maryland-bills-fan

Posted
Posted
  On 4/13/2018 at 4:24 PM, MikeSpeed said:

And the alternative is drafting OL, DL, WR... and finishing every season around 8-8 and never having a high enough draft pick to get the best QB. Wash rinse repeat. I'd trade it all every year until I have found "the guy".

Expand  

No.  The alternative to { I'd trade our entire draft if it meant getting a franchise QB. } is to draft one of the top 4-6 QB's and hope he is a good one.   We can trade our entire draft (2 1st, 2 seconds,  2 third and next years 1st) and have the same 50% bust rate as we do trading 2 firsts and maybe a second OR 9if the draft doesn't run heavy on QB) nothing.

NoSaint Hall of Famer

NoSaint

Posted
Posted

I’m willing to go to 2, but won’t complain should they have intel that says 5 or 7 is totally fine to get a guy they are confident about. 

billsredneck1 Veteran

billsredneck1

Posted
Posted
  On 4/13/2018 at 3:10 PM, snamsnoops said:

I don't care for any of the choices. The draft will change a lot of things after that first pick. I would be willing to part with 3 firsts to get the guy they want. Which doesn't necessarily mean getting to # 2.

Expand  

i'm ok with 3 1sts for a move to 2 or 4, but not much more than that.....period....

 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...