Idea From WGR: Use Picks To Build Team Then Grab Rodgers Next Year With the Cap $$

[Bills4life1924]

Even if this is the case to build up the roster through this draft, Russell Wilson would be more of a believable option than Rodgers

[Ol Dirty B]

I think anyone who believes he'll be a FA shouldn't be able to start threads.

 

 

[kota]

um franchise tag?

 

[dollars 2 donuts]

1 hour ago, Dalton said:

He has two years left on his contract - 2018 and 2019.

 

Why would GB let him go regardless?

 

 

Please, Dalton, you are obviously unaware of the "random thought that pops into Bills fans' heads regardless of fact or reason" card which is being played lately, much too much.

Edited April 11, 2018 by dollars 2 donuts

[TheFunPolice]

Irregardless of whom raised these issue's it is a mute point.

 

 

 

 

[PrimeTime101]

Just LOL!

[HereComesTheReignAgain]

 

 

[formerlyofCtown]

2 hours ago, H2o said:

Rodgers is not leaving GB. They would Franchise him for 3 years before they let that happen. 

Not if we put our tag on him first.

[BillsfaninChicago]

I actually wish Donahoe had done that in 2004.

[teef]

1 hour ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

I have a feeling someone at some point will say we should trade up for Barkley.

And that thread will begin with, “now hear me out...”

[BadLandsMeanie]

2 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:

Was this an idea by an on-air talent, or a caller? Sounds like a caller idea. If it was on-air talent they should be fired.

Well, I was not fully awake but I know it wasn't a caller. As I recall it, it was on air talent repeating an idea that another commentator / reporter/ draft guy had said.

 

Obviously I didn't check in to the contract and facts, I had assumed it was feasible.

 

Which seems to have been a mistake.

 

And some people aren't being very nice about it. 

 

 

[DaBillsFanSince1973]

1 minute ago, BadLandsMeanie said:

And some people aren't being very nice about it. 

 

 

they seem to crawl out from the cracks around this joint.

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

8 minutes ago, teef said:

And that thread will begin with, “now hear me out...”

 

And instead of responding in that thread, 3 more new threads will start on why we shouldn’t want that, than 5 more on why we should, then 8 more on why shouldn’t and so on 

Edited April 11, 2018 by Over 29 years of fanhood

[Foxx]

33 minutes ago, BadLandsMeanie said:

Well, I was not fully awake but I know it wasn't a caller. As I recall it, it was on air talent repeating an idea that another commentator / reporter/ draft guy had said.

 

Obviously I didn't check in to the contract and facts, I had assumed it was feasible.

 

Which seems to have been a mistake.

 

And some people aren't being very nice about it. 

 

 

this is the internet. perhaps a call to Al Gore might be in order.

 

[DC Tom]

Given the Bills' long history of destroying rather than developing QBs, I like this idea.  Build the team, then get a QB someone else has developed.

 

I mean, sure, it's completely impossible.  But it's still more likely to succeed than drafting a QB then calling for his head after the first OTA.

[BadLandsMeanie]

2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

Given the Bills' long history of destroying rather than developing QBs, I like this idea.  Build the team, then get a QB someone else has developed.

 

I mean, sure, it's completely impossible.  But it's still more likely to succeed than drafting a QB then calling for his head after the first OTA.

 

I'm glad to hear somebody say that. Not just about the Bills, but about the league.

 

They keep drafting really talented looking young guys, who almost always fail. And nobody much questions how good of a job teams are doing training them. I think it is a fair question and maybe it isn't always that there is just nobody who can do it. 

[DrDawkinstein]

51 minutes ago, BadLandsMeanie said:

Well, I was not fully awake but I know it wasn't a caller. As I recall it, it was on air talent repeating an idea that another commentator / reporter/ draft guy had said.

 

Obviously I didn't check in to the contract and facts, I had assumed it was feasible.

 

Which seems to have been a mistake.

 

And some people aren't being very nice about it. 

 

 

 

Ha, I wasnt blaming you for the idea. But now that you mentioned it, I guess I should blame you for spreading such nonsense!

[Royale with Cheese]

1 hour ago, teef said:

And that thread will begin with, “now hear me out...”

 

The poster probably is from Idaho but tells people he's from Seattle.

[Buffalo Barbarian]

They won't let Rodgers go  and I want a QB who is going to be around for 15 years not towards the end of their careers.

 

 

[Like A Mofo]

I say we just wait 5 years, build through the draft, and pry Sam Darnold away from the Browns.

 

Totally reasonable