Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Oh, no...not...RECORDINGS!!!!!

At this point the left will cream their pants if it's just more Howard Stern tapes.

Posted
6 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

 

The Donald Trump pee tape is real. Book it.

 

This has already been debunked. By numerous partisan groups on both sides. 

 

The desperation is thick, they've moved on to passing off old, debunked stories as "breaking news". 

 

They think you're stupid.

Posted

In other words...............

 

The lawyer-client privilege doesn't mean a darn thing.

 

Ok, got it. 

 

Welcome to the new America where Democrats lose their minds over a duly elected Republican President and do ANYTHING necessary to get him out of office right now. 

 

What's next???????? The customer client privilege between the First Lady and her hairdresser is at risk now.

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

This has already been debunked. By numerous partisan groups on both sides. 

 

The desperation is thick, they've moved on to passing off old, debunked stories as "breaking news". 

 

They think you're stupid.

 

Like I said, what's next with these un-American pieces of crap?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

This has already been debunked.

 

What has already been debunked? Cohen being in Prague? If you mean the pee tape I was just joking.

Posted
2 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

What has already been debunked? Cohen being in Prague? If you mean the pee tape I was just joking.

 

Cohen being in Prague - yes. 

 

It was a different Cohen - the mistake was made because the subcontractors at the FBI were(at the time) illegally scooping NSA 702 data and using it to compile their research. This was discussed at length months ago by all sides of the issue. 

 

They think you're too stupid to remember.

Posted
7 minutes ago, njbuff said:

In other words...............

 

The lawyer-client privilege doesn't mean a darn thing.

 

Ok, got it. 

 

Welcome to the new America where Democrats lose their minds over a duly elected Republican President and do ANYTHING necessary to get him out of office right now. 

 

What's next???????? The customer client privilege between the First Lady and her hairdresser is at risk now.

There's exceptions to the rule like the "crime-fraud" exemption and that's how they got the warrant.  I need to see the warrant before making any judgments.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Cohen being in Prague - yes. 

 

It was a different Cohen - the mistake was made because the subcontractors at the FBI were(at the time) illegally scooping NSA 702 data and using it to compile their research. This was discussed at length months ago by all sides of the issue. 

 

They think you're too stupid to remember.

 

Why is there always this rush to put stuff out there without doing proper research?

6 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

There's exceptions to the rule like the "crime-fraud" exemption and that's how they got the warrant.  I need to see the warrant before making any judgments.

 

If they have nothing, they look like fools.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Cohen being in Prague - yes. 

 

It was a different Cohen - the mistake was made because the subcontractors at the FBI were(at the time) illegally scooping NSA 702 data and using it to compile their research. This was discussed at length months ago by all sides of the issue. 

 

They think you're too stupid to remember.

 

Or, you know, new evidence has been brought to light in an ongoing investigation. What you said happened was never confirmed, it was just speculation. You gotta stay off of Jack Pobesiac social media space. His entire reputation is built around lying to people.

 

Here's the important part of that article for anyone following along:

 

But investigators have traced evidence that Cohen entered the Czech Republic through Germany, apparently during August or early September of 2016 as the ex-spy reported, said the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation is confidential. He wouldn’t have needed a passport for such a trip, because both countries are in the so-called Schengen Area in which 26 nations operate with open borders.

 

Now I know, "anonymous sources." For some of you that will be enough to dismiss this. Luckily we'll have clearer answers over the next few months. But this is not just re-reporting of an old supposedly debunked news story. It's a new report.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

Now I know, "anonymous sources." For some of you that will be enough to dismiss this. Luckily we'll have clearer answers over the next few months. But this is not just re-reporting of an old supposedly debunked news story. It's a new report.

 

Every single anonymous sourced story has been shown to be spectacularly wrong - including this one, almost a year ago

 

But this time will be different... 

 

They think you're stupid.

Posted
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Every single anonymous sourced story has been shown to be spectacularly wrong - including this one, almost a year ago

 

But this time will be different... 

 

They think you're stupid.

He's doing his level best to prove them right.

Posted
32 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

There's exceptions to the rule like the "crime-fraud" exemption and that's how they got the warrant.  I need to see the warrant before making any judgments.

 

Screw the warrant, I'm far more interested in seeing the warrant application.

Posted
27 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

Or, you know, new evidence has been brought to light in an ongoing investigation. What you said happened was never confirmed, it was just speculation. You gotta stay off of Jack Pobesiac social media space. His entire reputation is built around lying to people.

 

Here's the important part of that article for anyone following along:

 

 

 

 

Now I know, "anonymous sources." For some of you that will be enough to dismiss this. Luckily we'll have clearer answers over the next few months. But this is not just re-reporting of an old supposedly debunked news story. It's a new report.

 

It's not much of a report.  Evidence that Cohen may have been in the Czech Republic within a three week period, corroborated by insufficient documentation of him being anywhere else, where a meeting no one can confirm may or may not have happened.

 

The only new item in that whole article is "The Justice Department special counsel has evidence that Donald Trump’s personal lawyer and confidant, Michael Cohen, secretly made a late-summer trip to Prague during the 2016 presidential campaign, according to two sources familiar with the matter."  And the rest of the article is a rehash of existing news and speculation, with absolutely no corroborating facts or analysis of the initial claim.  

 

That's evidence of desperate groping for a story, nothing more.

Posted
12 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

It's not much of a report.  Evidence that Cohen may have been in the Czech Republic within a three week period, corroborated by insufficient documentation of him being anywhere else, where a meeting no one can confirm may or may not have happened.

 

The only new item in that whole article is "The Justice Department special counsel has evidence that Donald Trump’s personal lawyer and confidant, Michael Cohen, secretly made a late-summer trip to Prague during the 2016 presidential campaign, according to two sources familiar with the matter."  And the rest of the article is a rehash of existing news and speculation, with absolutely no corroborating facts or analysis of the initial claim.  

 

That's evidence of desperate groping for a story, nothing more.

Sure sure. 

 

They made such such a big deal to say he was not there and now it turns out he was. I know you hope this isn't true but it looks like the worst coming to light. If he was meeting with the Russian hackers and paying them off this is the game set and match. 

 

This is collusion, conspiracy and maybe treason. The sh it may very well have hit the fan 

Posted

It's not supposed to work this way.

 

Exclusive: FBI seized recordings between Trump´s lawyer and Stormy Daniels´ former lawyer
CNN, by Gloria Borger*

 

Original Article

 

 

 And how soon will CNN be playing those tapes?

 

 

 

 

Attorney-client-priv-3.jpeg?resize=600,4

 

 

 

 

Attorney-client-priv-2.jpeg?resize=600,4

 

 

 

 

Attorney-Client-priv.jpeg?resize=580%2C331

Posted
7 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Sure sure. 

 

They made such such a big deal to say he was not there and now it turns out he was. I know you hope this isn't true but it looks like the worst coming to light. If he was meeting with the Russian hackers and paying them off this is the game set and match. 

 

This is collusion, conspiracy and maybe treason. The sh it may very well have hit the fan 

 joy behar just came

×
×
  • Create New...