Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Call_Of_Ktulu said:

Allen has the Brains and the Arm, if he fixes his footwork and accuracy he will be the best QB from this draft. Lot of ?????? marks from all the QB's in this draft. The feeling I get from the top 4 QB's is 2 will be great and 2 will be solid,  I don't think any will be a Ryan Leaf type QB.

 

You can't fix accuracy.  Just like you can't coach brains or quickness.

 

Also - I read a great line by one of the QB Analysts, a QBs ceiling is his college stats.

Edited by MTBill
Posted
3 hours ago, jahnyc said:

The Chargers have had an interesting history with QBs.  Rivers has been very good, Leaf was a bust and Brees left in free agency after a bad shoulder injury.  Rivers and Brees have been two of the best QBs over the last 10 plus years.

Dan Fouts revolutionized the position

Posted
3 hours ago, dlonce said:

 

There were a lot of people who thought Leaf was the best QB. Happens all the time and is going to happen in this draft.

Hindsight is 20/20.

There could be a guy not considered in the top 4 that will go on to have a better career than guys like Darnold/Rosen.

Then again,maybe not. It’s a crapshoot we hope the scouts and Beane have nailed.

There wasn't ONE SCOUT or GM or ANY OTHER Pro Personnel professional who thought Leaf was a better QB prospect. Not one. That was a media driven narrative proffered by the talking head pundits with magazines and draft guides to sell.

 

Yes, there were a lot of people who thought Leaf was a better prospect, but nobody in the league did. 

Posted
1 hour ago, schoolhouserock said:

Which of these QB prospects has the brain?

 

 

Josh Allen

 

  • Josh Allen: 37
  • Josh Rosen: 29
  • Sam Darnold: 28
  • Baker Mayfield: 25
  • Lamar Jackson: 13
Posted
7 minutes ago, ddaryl said:

 

 

Josh Allen

 

  • Josh Allen: 37
  • Josh Rosen: 29
  • Sam Darnold: 28
  • Baker Mayfield: 25
  • Lamar Jackson: 13

Is Allen's number meaningful?

No.

Above 16 isn't a realistic predictor of NFL ability in a QB. Failing to get to 16 is. Especially once you get above 20 the numbers become meaningless.  

Posted
14 minutes ago, Tyrod's friend said:

Is Allen's number meaningful?

No.

Above 16 isn't a realistic predictor of NFL ability in a QB. Failing to get to 16 is. Especially once you get above 20 the numbers become meaningless.  

 

 

I was simply answering the question someone else had asked.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Accuracy and the ability to read the field are the most important attributes for a QB.

 

Without those things, the rest doesn't matter. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, ddaryl said:

 

 

Josh Allen

 

  • Josh Allen: 37
  • Josh Rosen: 29
  • Sam Darnold: 28
  • Baker Mayfield: 25
  • Lamar Jackson: 13

 

Wonderlic scores isn't the ultimate determiner of a QBs football IQ

 

though a very low score can be alarming 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

 

Wonderlic scores isn't the ultimate determiner of a QBs football IQ

 

though a very low score can be alarming 

 

...wasn't Marino at 16?......

Posted

I think the right answer is trade down, build a TEAM, and next tear follow the Pitts model where they built a TEAM and then traded up to acquire Big Ben as their franchise QB.

 

The current Bills roster simply has too many holes and one of the oldest rosters in the NFL that we need to build the TEAM first and then acquire the Franchise QB.

 

This strategy actually not inly give us a better chance of getting Ws this year but winning it all next year.

 

Might Darnold, one of the Josh;s or even Mayfield be THE franchise QB?  Maybe (but which one and quite frankly any of them might be Ryan Leaf.

 

The Jets have set a market rate of 3 v2nds for an early pick.  This Bills team will be so much weaker for the alleged Franchise QB if we have to trade both firsts to move up.  On the other hand, if we trade down and get even 2 seconds we not only strengthen the TEAM  even more but use one of the new 2nds to draft Rudolph or Jackson.

 

I love the idea of a 2018 Bills team with an offensive and defensive trench reinforcement AND 2 early round LB prospects AND McCarron, Peterman and a Rudolph or Jackson competition at QB with the 6 first thrre round picks and a couple of extra 2nds from trading down.

Posted

 

33 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...wasn't Marino at 16?......

He was. I'm pretty sure Kelly was as well.

It's a different time. Players didn't study for the exam, no one placed a great deal of importance on it. Today it's like the SAT. Jackson's score is a little crazy ... but then again, he didn't feel like running the 40 either. Maybe he decided that wasn't a test he really wanted to prep for. Who knows.

Posted

Been saying brains over brawn since Manning was at Tennessee and I followed that team religiously! You can't fix stupid, it's that simple. It's why I continue to argue for a 22 minimum Wonderlic at QB. The starting point for a SB winning QB is brains first. I'd never draft a sub-22. That 22+ includes an assessment of emotional intelligence/personality. Ration over emotion. Team over individual. Hard work over reliance on physical skills. Grit over shrinking violets. Then physical skills and to me, mechanics are huge. I think trying to "fix" major flaws developed and ingrained into QBs over their high school and college careers is a tall order. EJ has problems, they were never correct. He reverted to them in games. 

 

But metrics and analysis in the NFL is still behind the times. The eye test that results in teams falling in love with a guy like Josh Allen still dominates. 

 

 

Posted

Manning got a 28 and Leaf got a 27. The "head" he's talking about has nothing to do with a test score. The "considerable discipline and maturity" - which one of the top 4-5 QBs this year is the standout in that regard?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Meh. said:

Manning got a 28 and Leaf got a 27. The "head" he's talking about has nothing to do with a test score. The "considerable discipline and maturity" - which one of the top 4-5 QBs this year is the standout in that regard?

 

I don't recall any of them being spoken of in those terms....

Posted
17 hours ago, BigBuff423 said:

Given the earnest and incessant debate on this message board about which QB the Bills should Draft, whether they should trade up, stay put or take one in the following rounds, I find it interesting that nearly 20 years ago to the day - April 5, 1998 - this same debate raged on, regarding the Colts #1 selection. The argument about taking a very gifted QB with all the physical traits a GM and HC would covet versus a QB with the mental acumen to play QB in the NFL but lacks the "wow" factor in the arm. 

 

It's not news breaking or anything revealing that such a debate continues, but that it continues with such zealous representation I do find interesting. Because, history does NOT seem to be on the side of physical ability when the mental acumen is missing. And please, do NOT turn this into a Lamar Jackson discussion as that has been beaten to death elsewhere. But, maybe more about the general idea of how a QB is valued in the Draft over how he is valued once the lights come on and the games matter. Brady is one who didn't have a great arm but there are others throughout history who've done well absent a great arm. Either way, I thought it was a nice topic of discussion given how salient this debate is to us as fans this Draft season. 

 

DaBr-csU8AA7Ve2.jpg

 

 

Sounds like Rosen vs Allen

 

 

14 hours ago, schoolhouserock said:

Which of these QB prospects has the brain?

 

Mayfield

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

That just shows the seperation between the media and actual front office people...the Colts knew Manning was the better qb and people forget Manning before the neck injury had more than enough zip on his throws. The only media member who is kinda clued in to how the NFL front offices work is Mike Mayock. People often mistunderstand his rankings he doesn't rank QBs only on his views on them as a prospect he ranks them based on how people in front offices he talks to view them . Hence why he has Josh Allen so high cus NFL people think he can be coached up .

Posted
15 hours ago, Buffalo716 said:

 

Wonderlic scores isn't the ultimate determiner of a QBs football IQ

 

though a very low score can be alarming 

 

I really was just answering a question for another poster

×
×
  • Create New...