Mat68 Posted April 6, 2018 Posted April 6, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, maryland-bills-fan said: Yes, that is the best you could do. But imagine what you could have done for those positions with those 2 first and 2 second round picks ! Somehow I feel that Beane and company are NOT going to spend anything more on wide receiver. There are a lot of seasoned veteran WR's looking for work. They have known NFL abilities and they might clobber together several one-trick ponies and shuffle these guys in and out of the lineup. I would rather watch a legit Qb prospect playing Qb in Buffalo for first time in 3 decades than a good Mike or Will and a DT. Why do you need those extra picks when adequate vetran players can fill needs like your point on Wrs? By moving up they will have a full compliment of picks by also grabbing a qb in a position they would not have been able to otherwise. Seems like a win, win. Edited April 6, 2018 by Mat68
3rdand12 Posted April 6, 2018 Posted April 6, 2018 8 hours ago, Dr. Who said: OP has an agenda I don't agree with. Gunner seems to think there is already a deal in place with the Giants, perhaps contingent on who the Browns take at 1. A price "somewhere in between" is most plausible. i have been of the same mind as Gunner. we are both only guessing though 1
Recommended Posts