Jobot Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 Copied the link below for reference, but with all the draft movement talk, this ranking system seems to have become sacred. So how seriously does everyone take this, more specifically do you think NFL GMs take this as gospel? I see this as maybe something for general guidance... but the changes in value within the top 4 seem absolutely ridiculous... I would much rather have picks 4 and 12 versus JUST 1-overall. So if I'm a GM, MY ranking system would be more grouping based and be something along the following... I'd also consider increasing #1 and #2 pts if I think there's generational talent, but no way would I expect this to be an immobile system. My Realistic Ranks 1 - 3000 pts 2-4 - 2700 pts 5-10 - 2000 pts 11-15 - 1700 pts 16-20 - 1500 pts 21-32 - 1000 pts Jimmi Johnson Pt System https://www.pro-football-reference.com/draft/draft_trade_value.htm
Albany,n.y. Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 Points are worthless when a potential franchise QB is available. A team trading up will always pay more than the point total for a high 1st round QB.
Buddo Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 My understanding of things is that the Jimmy Johnson system, is no longer used as anything other than a rough guide. There's another points system that is apparently being more widely used, but I can't come up with a link atm.
Recommended Posts