Bray Wyatt Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 7 minutes ago, maryland-bills-fan said: what is the depth if a starter goes down? ZIP. You dont spend a day two pick on depth
McBean Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 Yeah forget about QB and use the picks else where! Let’s ignore the QB position because it’s not that important anyway. I mean look at how well it’s worked out for us since Jimbo left by drafting CB’s and lineman in the top rounds! Denzel Ward or bust!!!!
GunnerBill Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 1 minute ago, Sky Diver said: We need to draft a QB, but we are not trading away our draft board to do it. Too many needs. There is no greater need. It is the most important position and we have nothing there. Beane is trying to trade up. There is zero doubt about it. Whether they accomplish it is another question.... but they want to go up and will give up their 2019 #1 if needs be. He said it himself last week. 1
Bray Wyatt Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 7 minutes ago, napmaster said: Yes, he did. He got $10M off the books for 2019 and also got 400 points draft capital. So effectively a mid 2nd rounder value. If he packages just picks to move up, then I would agree with you and he would never move down from that position. At this point though, a trade down from 12 is not off the table. So we went up from 21 to 12 yes? thats trading up. We used an asset to move up in the draft. He could have traded Glenn for something else, but he didnt. He wanted to move up.
maryland-bills-fan Posted April 4, 2018 Author Posted April 4, 2018 7 minutes ago, Wsam4031 said: so you thing AJ is good enough to win a super bowl? Which Qb are you drafting if you build up every other position in the earlier rounds? Probably not. A number of average QB's have won superbowls, but it is unlikely. If one of the top 4 (5?) doesn't drop to #12, we may be a year or two away from finding the guy. One thing I will challenge you with: Please show how the present roster (those other 21 guys on the field) is going to be able to be carried along by a God-like QB. We would be playing with backups from a 8-8 / 9-7 lucky team and free agents that were released from other teams. That is NOT going to go very far.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 You've become the chairman and CEO of the "avoid a QB" TSW cottage industry. Congratulations on your promotion.
Captain Hindsight Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, Sky Diver said: We were in cap hell and needed to rebuild the roster. We don't have the nucleus to trade away all of our draft picks. The playoff team last season, whose biggest issue was QB, doesnt have the nucleus to plug in a QB and win? Our best receiver last season was....... Thompson? A guy we picked up of the street in week 4 Still have Shady Still have a decent O-line Still have a good D line Still have a great secondary They traded all those guys to get a QB. If they don't think they can get a QB in the draft they wouldnt have traded Tyrod
Putin Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 1 minute ago, maryland-bills-fan said: Heh? Remember that EJ guy they drafted in the first round? Wasn't he a long snapper or backup punter? ..... By the way, you want to trade EVERY pick? Who is going to play linebacker? (Oh, the new QB is going to go both ways. Didn't think of that. Sorry.) Did you watch the SB this year ? or you were busy scouting the LB’s in this years draft ? Isn’t it sad that some teams have better backups ( QB ) then our starters in the past 10 years ?
Sky Diver Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 1 minute ago, GunnerBill said: There is no greater need. It is the most important position and we have nothing there. Beane is trying to trade up. There is zero doubt about it. Whether they accomplish it is another question.... but they want to go up and will give up their 2019 #1 if needs be. He said it himself last week. I could potentially see them moving to #6.
GunnerBill Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 Just now, Sky Diver said: I could potentially see them moving to #6. #2, #4, #6, #7 are all in play. #5 might be too..... really can't get a handle on what Denver wants to do.
SoCal Deek Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 The interesting part of this scenario is that Bills fans probably won’t know if it was a decent move until over a year from now. If I’m reading everyone correctly McCarron is going to be the starter in 2018. So the big question is how they’ll do with a re-fortified set of young players around him. This dream rookie is going to be holding a clipboard. 1
BillsVet Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 No team has completely rebuilt unless they have a QB who can make plays and win games for them. The fastest way to rebuild a team is to get the QB. Buddy Nix proved that trying to improve everything but the QB does not work, or at the least (with Whaley) it doesn't work very long. Get the QB. 1
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 Just now, BillsVet said: No team has completely rebuilt unless they have a QB who can make plays and win games for them. The fastest way to rebuild a team is to get the QB. Buddy Nix proved that trying to improve everything but the QB does not work, or at the least (with Whaley) it doesn't work very long. Get the QB. I can't understand how bills fans (of all people) can't understand this simple concept.
Sky Diver Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 From 10 - 3 before Rosen, UCLA went to 8 - 5, 4 - 8, and 6 - 7 with Rosen. One guy doesn't make a team. 1
BuffaloRush Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 47 minutes ago, maryland-bills-fan said: I am amused by all the experts who know about the "can't miss" rookie QB, who can perform miracles without an offensive line, wide receivers or linebackers on defense. ..... Please remember that or offensive line was bailed out by Taylor's feet and that we have aging ,declining guards, that we lost our starting center and traded away a rotational starting tackle. Three new faces are needed there................ We have one starting linebacker and need two more. Somebody from the first two rounds would do..................... Our wide receivers scare nobody, but Mr. Miracle Quarterback is going to have those guys free down the sidelines for a 50yard gain and shaking loose from coverage over the middle and getting an average 15 yard YAC on every play. Don't think so. At least one pick in the first 3 rounds is needed............Oh, did you forget that we lost some people as FA who had "DB" as their position? Maybe one more pick in the 1st three rounds is needed here...........................................BUT lets ignore all that and trade the first two rounds from this year and next year's first for a 50:50 shot. Yea, right. With all these needs (six plus a QB = 7) I can not see going in the direction of trading away the draft picks necessary to field a competitive team in order to get a possible star to have wet dreams about. The games are won in the "trenches". A cute rookie QB with a broken leg is not good for anything. I say we should do the following. Stay at #12 in case the QB that the Bills could live with is available. If not, they trade down and get your Bart Starr, Jim Kelly or Dan Marion with a later pick. (with arm twisting, moving up 3-4 spots and losing next year's 2nd rounder would be okay) Here is what we could get with a trade-down from the #12 pick. down to gets us this overall pick ============================== #14............100th player (4th round) #16.............78th player (3rd round) #18............60th player (2nd round) #20............55th player #22.............48th player #24.............44th player #26.............40th player #28.............36th player #30.............32nd player #32...............30.5th player (1st round) . . From Walter Football, here is a list of the players in that 30-55 range that we get for "free" by trading down. (I don't agree that all these guys will be available this low, but it gives you the idea). 30. Equanimeous St. Brown, WR, Notre Dame. Previously: 30 Avg. 23.8 per 30 31. Marcus Davenport, DE, Texas-San Antonio. Previously: 31 Avg. 31.8 per 10 32. Baker Mayfield, QB, Oklahoma. Previously: 32 Avg. 42.1 per 17 33. Christian Kirk, WR, Texas A&M. Previously: 33 Avg. 25.2 per 30 34. Nick Chubb, RB, Georgia. Previously: 34 Avg. 32.4 per 30 35. Tim Settle, DT, Virginia Tech. Previously: 35 Avg. 34.6 per 10 36. James Daniels, C, Iowa. Previously: 36 Avg. 36 per 9 37. Terrell Edmunds, S, Virginia Tech. Previously: 37 Avg. 37 per 24 38. Justin Reid, S, Stanford. Previously: 38 Avg. 32.8 per 19 39. Will Hernandez, G, UTEP. Previously: 39 Avg. 38.9 per 20 40. Kolton Miller, OT, UCLA. Previously: 40 Avg. 37.4 per 10 41. Leighton Vander Esch, LB, Boise State. Previously: 41 Avg. 48.8 per 9 42. D.J. Moore, WR, Maryland. Previously: NR Avg. 0 per 0 43. Harold Landry, DE, Boston College. Previously: 43 Avg. 32.2 per 30 44. JC Jackson, CB, Maryland. Previously: 44 Avg. 32.4 per 11 45. Dorance Armstrong Jr., DE, Kansas. Previously: 45 Avg. 28.1 per 30 46. Isaiah Wynn, OT, Georgia. Previously: 46 Avg. 46 per 14 47. Kerryon Johnson, RB, Auburn. Previously: 47 Avg. 46.9 per 17 48. Sam Hubbard, DE, Ohio State. Previously: 48 Avg. 45.6 per 30 49. Ronnie Harrison, S, Alabama. Previously: 49 Avg. 29.6 per 30 50. Jordan Whitehead, S, Pittsburgh. Previously: 50 Avg. 46.1 per 30 51. R.J. McIntosh, DT, Miami. Previously: 51 Avg. 54.9 per 9 52. Mark Andrews, TE, Oklahoma. Previously: 52 Avg. 52 per 9 53. Isaiah Oliver, CB, Colorado. Previously: 53 Avg. 53 per 9 54. Ronald Jones II, RB, USC. Previously: 54 Avg. 54 per 9 55. Duke Ejiofor, DE, Wake Forest. http://walterfootball.com/nfldraftbigboard#ixzz5BhirZysC A good center, a good linebacker, a good WR or a good RB. You get an extra solid player, probably a starter, for your effort. If the best QB shots are gone at #12, build a strong team with those 7 picks and take a QB out of the top 15. If you consider the context of the Bills decisions since the 2017 draft, it’s pretty clear that they didn’t make all those moves only to trade back down in the draft. While this idea makes sense on paper - there’s a 0% chance of this happening consider they traded up to #12. 1
bmur66 Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 We got two guys to take the beating this year so the fresh rookie QB is ready for next year. Just sayin. 1 1
maryland-bills-fan Posted April 4, 2018 Author Posted April 4, 2018 13 minutes ago, Captain Hindsight said: Conspiracy theories are fun. You use the Pats* as an example of trading away talent to get picks. They also have Tom Brady. Bills have AJ McCarron and Nate "Picked off" Peterman. They are trading up to get a QB. The only question is who and at what pick What do you mean by "Conspiracy theories"? Have you mixed up your post with some political blog? The Pats are famous for trading away guys who have become sort of stars under their system. When they are a bit over the hill but still have a great reputation, the Pats sell them off at a premium and wind up with high draft picks for a soon-to-be-fading overpaid star. Last year's trades of the Bills is along the same line. It is called smart.
Mojo44 Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 46 minutes ago, Skins Malone said: I wouldn't trade down for the simple fact that the bills have alot of picks in this draft to begin with. I am torn about swinging for the fences and trading away said picks...but the bills do need to find an answer at QB. Its been far to long. I agree with this. Besides, the OP is wrong in asserting that Taylor helped out the offense of line with his scrambling. Just the opposite is true. The offense of line actually played pretty fair during 2017. The problem was Taylor’s tendency to panic under pressure and run into a sack.Again, embedded in the initial post is the ridiculous lingering narrative that Taylor was anything but horrible.
SoCal Deek Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, joesixpack said: I can't understand how bills fans (of all people) can't understand this simple concept. Joe, I don’t think anyone disagrees. The challenge for all us armchair GMs is figuring out how to move up and get one of the top QBs this year. What, or who, would you be willing to trade?
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Joe, I don’t think anyone disagrees. The challenge for all us armchair GMs is figuring out how to move up and get one of the top QBs this year. What, or who, would you be willing to trade? Everything. I'd trade the whole !@#$ing draft if I had to. It's that important. I'm tired of "run the ball and stop the run we play in cold weather" mindset. Half the league (including New England, Green Bay, Seattle and Schittsburgh) play in cold weather and have excellent passing games. Edited April 4, 2018 by joesixpack
Recommended Posts