maryland-bills-fan Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 (edited) I am amused by all the experts who know about the "can't miss" rookie QB, who can perform miracles without an offensive line, wide receivers or linebackers on defense. ..... Please remember that or offensive line was bailed out by Taylor's feet and that we have aging ,declining guards, that we lost our starting center and traded away a rotational starting tackle. Three new faces are needed there................ We have one starting linebacker and need two more. Somebody from the first two rounds would do..................... Our wide receivers scare nobody, but Mr. Miracle Quarterback is going to have those guys free down the sidelines for a 50yard gain and shaking loose from coverage over the middle and getting an average 15 yard YAC on every play. Don't think so. At least one pick in the first 3 rounds is needed............Oh, did you forget that we lost some people as FA who had "DB" as their position? Maybe one more pick in the 1st three rounds is needed here...........................................BUT lets ignore all that and trade the first two rounds from this year and next year's first for a 50:50 shot. Yea, right. With all these needs (six plus a QB = 7) I can not see going in the direction of trading away the draft picks necessary to field a competitive team in order to get a possible star to have wet dreams about. The games are won in the "trenches". A cute rookie QB with a broken leg is not good for anything. I say we should do the following. Stay at #12 in case the QB that the Bills could live with is available. If not, they trade down and get your Bart Starr, Jim Kelly or Dan Marion with a later pick. (with arm twisting, moving up 3-4 spots and losing next year's 2nd rounder would be okay) Here is what we could get with a trade-down from the #12 pick. down to gets us this overall pick ============================== #14............100th player (4th round) #16.............78th player (3rd round) #18............60th player (2nd round) #20............55th player #22.............48th player #24.............44th player #26.............40th player #28.............36th player #30.............32nd player #32...............30.5th player (1st round) . . From Walter Football, here is a list of the players in that 30-55 range that we get for "free" by trading down. (I don't agree that all these guys will be available this low, but it gives you the idea). 30. Equanimeous St. Brown, WR, Notre Dame. Previously: 30 Avg. 23.8 per 30 31. Marcus Davenport, DE, Texas-San Antonio. Previously: 31 Avg. 31.8 per 10 32. Baker Mayfield, QB, Oklahoma. Previously: 32 Avg. 42.1 per 17 33. Christian Kirk, WR, Texas A&M. Previously: 33 Avg. 25.2 per 30 34. Nick Chubb, RB, Georgia. Previously: 34 Avg. 32.4 per 30 35. Tim Settle, DT, Virginia Tech. Previously: 35 Avg. 34.6 per 10 36. James Daniels, C, Iowa. Previously: 36 Avg. 36 per 9 37. Terrell Edmunds, S, Virginia Tech. Previously: 37 Avg. 37 per 24 38. Justin Reid, S, Stanford. Previously: 38 Avg. 32.8 per 19 39. Will Hernandez, G, UTEP. Previously: 39 Avg. 38.9 per 20 40. Kolton Miller, OT, UCLA. Previously: 40 Avg. 37.4 per 10 41. Leighton Vander Esch, LB, Boise State. Previously: 41 Avg. 48.8 per 9 42. D.J. Moore, WR, Maryland. Previously: NR Avg. 0 per 0 43. Harold Landry, DE, Boston College. Previously: 43 Avg. 32.2 per 30 44. JC Jackson, CB, Maryland. Previously: 44 Avg. 32.4 per 11 45. Dorance Armstrong Jr., DE, Kansas. Previously: 45 Avg. 28.1 per 30 46. Isaiah Wynn, OT, Georgia. Previously: 46 Avg. 46 per 14 47. Kerryon Johnson, RB, Auburn. Previously: 47 Avg. 46.9 per 17 48. Sam Hubbard, DE, Ohio State. Previously: 48 Avg. 45.6 per 30 49. Ronnie Harrison, S, Alabama. Previously: 49 Avg. 29.6 per 30 50. Jordan Whitehead, S, Pittsburgh. Previously: 50 Avg. 46.1 per 30 51. R.J. McIntosh, DT, Miami. Previously: 51 Avg. 54.9 per 9 52. Mark Andrews, TE, Oklahoma. Previously: 52 Avg. 52 per 9 53. Isaiah Oliver, CB, Colorado. Previously: 53 Avg. 53 per 9 54. Ronald Jones II, RB, USC. Previously: 54 Avg. 54 per 9 55. Duke Ejiofor, DE, Wake Forest. http://walterfootball.com/nfldraftbigboard#ixzz5BhirZysC A good center, a good linebacker, a good WR or a good RB. You get an extra solid player, probably a starter, for your effort. If the best QB shots are gone at #12, build a strong team with those 7 picks and take a QB out of the top 15. Edited April 4, 2018 by maryland-bills-fan 5
GunnerBill Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 If you get to a situation where the Browns go QB at #1, the Giants do at #2, the Jets do at #3.... the Browns refuse to trade out of #4 and then Broncos go QB at #5 I would happily trade back from #12. I just don't think there is any chance that the scenario plays out. 1
Skins Malone Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 I wouldn't trade down for the simple fact that the bills have alot of picks in this draft to begin with. I am torn about swinging for the fences and trading away said picks...but the bills do need to find an answer at QB. Its been far to long. 2
K D Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 Yeah not like QB is important. Just get a guy later in the draft. Who cares right? 2 1
BuffaloHokie13 Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: If you get to a situation where the Browns go QB at #1, the Giants do at #2, the Jets do at #3.... the Browns refuse to trade out of #4 and then Broncos go QB at #5 I would happily trade back from #12. I just don't think there is any chance that the scenario plays out. Even in that scenario I want to make sure Edmunds or Smith isn't available at 12 before moving. 5
Magox Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 It all depends on how things unfold, if they think they can get certain players at lower draft slots then sure. But we do have 6 picks in the first 3 rounds and if we cannot trade up to get one of the elite 4, then drafting 6 different positions via the draft certainly does fill a lot of holes, at least on paper it does.
Kirby Jackson Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 I’ll play along but in a slightly different way. Keep 12, trade 22 and your 4th for a 2nd this year and 1st next year. Trade a 2nd and 2019 4th for Foles. The next month could look something like this: - Foles - Roquan Smith - Billy Price - Christian Kirk - Rashad Penny - Darius Leonard - Brian O’Neill - Avonte Maddox - 2019 1st I am not one that believes Foles is the answer but thought this would be a fun exercise. 3
GunnerBill Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 Just now, BuffaloHokie13 said: Even in that scenario I want to make sure Edmunds or Smith isn't available at 12 before moving. Yea me too. If 4 QBs go in the first 5 plus say Barkley.... that leaves Fitzpatrick, Nelson, Chubb and Ward (who I am not as high as some on but there are two big CB need teams at #8 and #9) then it would depend who went #10 and #11. 1
maryland-bills-fan Posted April 4, 2018 Author Posted April 4, 2018 Question: Your team is in a passing down. How many offensive linemen have to miss a block before the QB is out for the year with a concussion or broken leg....................But who needs offensive linemen?
Bray Wyatt Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 We did not trade up to trade back Also we do not need a db in the first 3 rounds
ddaryl Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 LMFAO Another wack-a-doodle scenario... We will stay at 12 and take a top 10 player that will fall because of the run on QB's if that's the way it plays out What fool would trade back from that..... 2
Sky Diver Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 I agree. Rebuld the trenches. No rookie QB will not be successful behind this OL.
napmaster Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, Bray Wyatt said: We did not trade up to trade back Beane traded players to improve the cap situation for 2019 and got draft picks as compensation. He has not traded up yet.
Wsam4031 Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 14 minutes ago, kdiggz said: Yeah not like QB is important. Just get a guy later in the draft. Who cares right? right! same ol sh@t new day Just now, Sky Diver said: I agree. Rebuld the trenches. No rookie QB will not be successful behind this OL. so then what do you do at qb if you build the trenches this year?
Bray Wyatt Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 Just now, napmaster said: Beane traded players to improve the cap situation for 2019 and got draft picks as compensation. He has not traded up yet. Oh? Did we not give up pick 21 with Cordy Glenn?
hemma Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 I want that #12. Odell Beckham, Fletcher Cox, Warren Sapp, Clay Matthews You can get a stud at that spot and we need a few.
Wsam4031 Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 13 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: I’ll play along but in a slightly different way. Keep 12, trade 22 and your 4th for a 2nd this year and 1st next year. Trade a 2nd and 2019 4th for Foles. The next month could look something like this: - Foles - Roquan Smith - Billy Price - Christian Kirk - Rashad Penny - Darius Leonard - Brian O’Neill - Avonte Maddox - 2019 1st I am not one that believes Foles is the answer but thought this would be a fun exercise. Eagles were already offered a 2nd and said they wouldn't take less than a first. They wanted 2 first but I think that's insane and they go down to 1 if anyone gave them one which nobody will do because Foles isn't that good
K D Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 1 minute ago, Wsam4031 said: right! same ol sh@t new day so then what do you do at qb if you build the trenches this year? they rebuild the trenches then someone leaves so next year they have to rebuild something else and then it never ends. there's always going to be holes on a team so i guess we just never get a QB right? man, there are some really bad posts lately 3
vorpma Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 I somewhat agree with the point you are making, yes we need a franchise QB but the offensive line is not dominating; if you daft a franchise QB and he gets the hell beat out of him it can he is not going to do you much good! 1 minute ago, kdiggz said: they rebuild the trenches then someone leaves so next year they have to rebuild something else and then it never ends. there's always going to be holes on a team so i guess we just never get a QB right? man, there are some really bad posts lately This is not a bad post, there is a very legitimate point there!
Will-GM-for-food Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 If the Bills "filled other holes" and only got a late round QB who mysteriously doesn't end up playing like a 1st overall pick, these same people that are calling for a trade down would be complaining and hammering the Bills for picking Peterman 2.0 1
Recommended Posts