Rico Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 35 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said: Albert BreerVerified account @AlbertBreer 45s45 seconds ago More The Rams were actively looking at ways to replace Sammy Watkins, and Brandin Cooks, on paper, represents an upgrade. Sean McVay's been eyeing Cooks for while -- Source says Rams and Saints talked trade last year. Very nice upgrade over Sammy Decoy. 2
Augie Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 4 minutes ago, JerseyBills said: Obj would be a nightmare in that system. Does it sound like the Pats to pay that kind of money for a WR? 1
Cripple Creek Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 47 minutes ago, Chuck Wagon said: I'm not a "I quit on the team guy". That being said, if Beane sits on these picks and watches the Jets and Pats move in to take QBs, I quit. Don’t do that. Just join the rest of us in ridiculing the pick.
Nihilarian Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 1 minute ago, BillsFan17 said: Don't ever discount what the Pat's could do if need be. How on this green earth do they get what they got for Cooks? I mean how do they pull off half of what they do? Believe me if the Pat's want to move up they will find a way. Scary stuff when you think that they have the ability to sit and goom any one of these rookie QB's and they also have the eye to evaluate who will rise to the top. As if having Tom Brady at QB for nearly 20 years isn't bad enough. 1
K D Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 If Beane loses out on a QB to the Patriots after a whole year of trades in preparation then just clean out your office now and head back to Carolina. Losing out to the Jets was bad enough. This would be too much 4
PatsFanNH Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 23 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said: And no team wants to "help" the Pats have longevity after Brady is gone. So by default, our offer on equal ground has more chance to be accepted than the Pats...and our picks are better anyway like you said. Younoffer your twonfirst B.B. offers #23 and Gronk. Who do you think the Giants take?
Zac Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 i wouldn't be surprised if the Patriots are just getting into the QB game just to jack the price up for us 1
TH3 Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 1 minute ago, kdiggz said: If Beane loses out on a QB to the Patriots after a whole year of trades in preparation then just clean out your office now and head back to Carolina. Losing out to the Jets was bad enough. This would be too much gawd...
HappyDays Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 6 minutes ago, BillsFan17 said: How on this green earth do they get what they got for Cooks? I mean how do they pull off half of what they do? The same way we got a 2nd for Sammy. Les Snead gonna Les Snead. 1
BuffaloBaumer Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 You absolutely just have to laugh at this point. And some people actually don't think we need to trade up for a QB. Have fun being the doormat for another 17 years
HappyDays Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 Why are the last few pages people freaking out about the Pats? They have way less draft capital than us. Even the Jets have more than them. If they're looking for a QB it will be Jackson, Rudolph, or Lauletta. They arent suddenly in the conversation for a top 5 pick. 1
PatsFanNH Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 17 minutes ago, N.Y. Orangeman said: Can you imagine the backlash if the dealt Brady’s top WR (arguable, I guess) for a future QB in the last days of the best QB ever, after losing so much in the free agency period and, even before that, needing so much on D? This is about the final run and beefing up, not rebuilding. A QB in the second or later? I can buy it, but they aren’t competitors for our guy, whichever one of the four it is. Edelman is and will be his #1 and Hogan when healthy was his #2 and well Gronk (I know you guys hate him) is better than all of them. They also have a young WR did well Year 1 but also was IR last year. The Pats were not going resign him and got a better deal back than what they spent for him. 1
HappyDays Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 Just now, BuffaloBaumer said: You absolutely just have to laugh at this point. And some people actually don't think we need to trade up for a QB. Have fun being the doormat for another 17 years What does this even mean? The Pats got pick 23 which means we're going to be their doormat for 17 more years? 1
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 1 minute ago, HappyDays said: What does this even mean? The Pats got pick 23 which means we're going to be their doormat for 17 more years? Patriots PTSD, we've watched them run circles around the Bills forever. 1
PatsFanNH Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 All said I think the Pats Going D heavy this draft and this trade allows them possibly move up and take the best DT available
BuffaloBaumer Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 2 minutes ago, HappyDays said: What does this even mean? The Pats got pick 23 which means we're going to be their doormat for 17 more years? It means they have two first rounders, Gronk and who knows what else they would throw out there to move up.... 2
Alphadawg7 Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 6 minutes ago, PatsFanNH said: Younoffer your twonfirst B.B. offers #23 and Gronk. Who do you think the Giants take? Ours. Giants got a young stud at TE, they have no need for Gronk, his injuries, or his contract...not to mention, he's a toss up to even keep playing beyond this year, and he hasn't even committed to this year. They would take our 2 picks in a heartbeat over one first and Gronk from the Pats. 2
YoloinOhio Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 (edited) 6 minutes ago, HappyDays said: What does this even mean? The Pats got pick 23 which means we're going to be their doormat for 17 more years? At this point it just means they have an extra pick, which they need to fill holes because they have no cap space Edited April 3, 2018 by YoloinOhio 1
HappyDays Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, joesixpack said: Patriots PTSD, we've watched them run circles around the Bills forever. I get it but they make bad moves all the time. They're successful because they have the GOAT QB and GOAT head coach. Their draft classes are usually average. They traded Garroppolo for a 2nd which might go down as one of the worst trades of all time. It's obviously great for them that they were able to rent Cooks for a year for basically nothing, but it didn't end up mattering. Edited April 3, 2018 by HappyDays
Chuck Wagon Posted April 3, 2018 Posted April 3, 2018 11 minutes ago, BuffaloBaumer said: It means they have two first rounders, Gronk and who knows what else they would throw out there to move up.... Right. If he decided getting one of these young QBs is what's best for his organization, I have full faith Belichick would make it happen. Right now it feels like Beane is haggling over minor details while the rest of the division is positioning to box him out. 1
Recommended Posts