Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

Speculation based on what's already out there from various places.

 

Yep.

I said it on another thread.

I believe the only QB the Giants want is Darnold, but that they also could be in on Barkley.

If browns go Allen #1, Giants almost certainly will take Darnold #2.

If browns go Darnold, Giants want Barkley, but might move for a big haul.

Posted
1 minute ago, SouthNYfan said:

Chad from "mad real world" was a cool dude.

 

 

I had no idea what that reference meant. Turns out he looks almost exactly like I imagined a Chad to look like :D

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

Schefter, Rapoport, Glazer, Mort.....

 

Those guys are legit.

 

Most everyone else is trying to make a name for themselves by posting a bunch of general rumors then claiming they had the scoop.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Blokestradamus said:

 

I had no idea what that reference meant. Turns out he looks almost exactly like I imagined a Chad to look like :D

 

His girlfriend Katie got some big ol' t*tties.

She got it on good with Lysol too.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted

TBH: I've been saying (with no sources) that the Bills probably have a trade set up with the Giants and the Giants are just waiting to see if Darnold will be there or not before pulling the trigger

Posted
20 minutes ago, PIZ said:

Not sure if this guy is legit.

 

 

 


Kind of sounds like this guy has decided what rumors he believes and which ones he doesn't.   And this is how he puts it together.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

The Bucs part is almost certainly true. Their GM pretty much publicly stated that he's been talking to a lot of teams about sliding down from #7 and implied that a QB would likely be taken in their slot in that scenario.

Posted
4 minutes ago, DCOrange said:

The Bucs part is almost certainly true. Their GM pretty much publicly stated that he's been talking to a lot of teams about sliding down from #7 and implied that a QB would likely be taken in their slot in that scenario.

Beane also specifically mentioned pick #7 last week. He said it may not do them any good to go to 7 because they could get “stuck there.” He may have just been negotiating in the media to posture for a better deal from Licht.

Posted
1 minute ago, YoloinOhio said:

Beane also specifically mentioned pick #7 last week. He said it may not do them any good to go to 7 because they could get “stuck there.” He may have just been negotiating in the media to posture for a better deal from Licht.

Why do I see a slow desperate climb up: 12 to 7, 7 to 5/4 and 5/4 to 2?

Posted
2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Beane also specifically mentioned pick #7 last week. He said it may not do them any good to go to 7 because they could get “stuck there.” He may have just been negotiating in the media to posture for a better deal from Licht.

 

What would it cost to get to 7? If 6 to 3 cost 3 2nd rounders, it can't be too bad...

×
×
  • Create New...