Boca BIlls Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 It has nothing to do with how many draft picks you have, it is about getting the right mesh of players and picking the correct talent. It all starts with a QB and if you can piece together everything else by selecting the correct talent you will be a contender as long as the coaching staff does their job as well. Giving up picks does not mean no playoffs. Selecting the wrong players does.
baskingridgebillsfan Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 if they hit on the qb wouldn't they have enough cap money next year to buy a bunch of solid starters ? yes they would
reddogblitz Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 6 hours ago, MAJBobby said: So they Built around their trade up QB. Amazing people here against trading up say that is impossible How far did they have to trade up for Nick?
Domdab99 Posted April 4, 2018 Author Posted April 4, 2018 (edited) Say we do this instead of reaching for a QB: Round 1 Pick 12: James, Derwin, SS/FS, Florida State Round 1 Pick 22: Vander Esch, Leighton, OLB/ILB, Boise State Round 2 Pick 21: Lauletta, Kyle, QB, Richmond Round 2 Pick 28 (PITT): Chark, DJ, WR, LSU Round 3 Pick 1: Sutton, Courtland, WR, Southern Methodist Round 3 Pick 28 (PITT): Christian, Geron, OT, Louisville Round 3 Pick 32: Settle, Tim, DT, Virginia Tech Round 4 Pick 21: Griffin, Shaquem, OLB, Central Florida Round 5 Pick 29: Scarbrough, Bo, RB, Alabama Round 6 Pick 13: Dickson, Michael, P, Texas Now that's a draft that will plug some holes. Then next year you have the possibility of Lauletta, McCarron, or even Peterman stepping up, or you draft another QB or go after one in FA/trade. Trust me, I'd love to trade up for Josh Rosen or Baker Mayfield, too, but I just think the cost is going to be too high. It's a conundrum, I know.... Edited April 4, 2018 by Domdab99 2
greeneblitz Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 hahaha, dumbest thing I've read on this site the entire draft season. Getting a franchise QB at any cost is the only chance we have to ever get back to the playoffs again (other than a BS back door sneak in that we did to break the streak). No player on the roster matters even 10% of a great QB, this fact has been proven over and over and over again, and yet we have a dedicated set of fans apparently living in the 1970s that QBs are just another player on the team. 8 hours ago, wagon127 said: When we missed the playoffs for 17 straight years, were we without a 1st, 2nd and 3rd round draft picks the entire time? Or were we missing a franchise QB? /end thread 1
reddogblitz Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 43 minutes ago, greeneblitz said: we have a dedicated set of fans apparently living in the 1970s that QBs are just another player on the team. Did you watch football in the 70s? It was the same then. Teams with great QBs were perennial winners. Cowboys with Staubach. Stealers with Bradshaw. Fish with Griese. Raiders with Stabler. Those were some great QBs. 1
ColdFront_USAF Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 14 hours ago, MAJBobby said: Rams say Hi Thats what I was thinking. One in a hundred? It worked twice in one draft. I really can't understand why people want to play the game of "let's just take what falls to us". I think we tried that once, and the guy that fell to us is unemployed while the others are either Hall of Fame bound or at the very least have been solid starters for over a decade.
MJS Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 Bull crap. What happened to the Eagles when they traded the farm for their QB?
#34fan Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 9 hours ago, Batman1876 said: So if he is so obviously good why was he the last FA picked and why did we get him so cheep? He wasn't the last. AJ was picked up less than a month after winning his grievance against the Bengals and becoming a FA. Both Sam Bradford and Mike Glennon Signed contracts after that. As to why he's so cheap... Well, he's still got a lot to prove doesn't he? I think the money is right for where he's at in his career.
GreggTX Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 Not so fast. We might be able to get a decent QB at 6 and still ha e some picks. Then next year we'll have a lot more for FA's. Trading up to 2, I agree, could be far too expensive. Having a good QB is also a good way to attract good FA's at reasonable rates.
Boatdrinks Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 31 minutes ago, ColdFront_USAF said: Thats what I was thinking. One in a hundred? It worked twice in one draft. I really can't understand why people want to play the game of "let's just take what falls to us". I think we tried that once, and the guy that fell to us is unemployed while the others are either Hall of Fame bound or at the very least have been solid starters for over a decade. Actually , the Bills moved up to draft that QB. He didn't fall to them.
ColdFront_USAF Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 1 hour ago, Boatdrinks said: Actually , the Bills moved up to draft that QB. He didn't fall to them. Thanks for the correction. Was a bit too young to remember exactly how that went, I just knew we took Losman at 22.
buffalo2218 Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 (edited) 16 hours ago, Domdab99 said: Plus, we've got a huge cap surplas next year....we can be very pro-active in FA then. All the more reason to gamble and move up this year. Seriously, missing out on Mahomes and Watson has to be the final straw. With all the grief the fans gave to guys like Whaley, Nix and Levy for missing out on QBs, do we really want to take that chance again knowing we have the ability to move up? I would risk it this year because to me, either way, McCaron will be the starter. I really don't want to wait another god knows how many years for another opportunity and waste any more time with project QBs until another QB heavy draft. How many years have we ignored the QB position hoping to be the exception to the rule? Edited April 4, 2018 by buffalo2218
GunnerBill Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 If the Bills move up and get the QB pick right then they will probably not make the playoffs in 2019 but I can see them having a chance to be really, really good in 2020. 2
OldTimer1960 Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 17 hours ago, MAJBobby said: Rams say Hi The Rams had a very solid defense and a good deal more talent overall when they traded up for Goff than the Bills currently have. Even with the ability to add some players in FA next year, it will hurt if they are missing their 1st pick next year due to a big trade up this year. i would be very surprised if Beane's master plan is to load up on FAs next year eating up all the cap room he just cleared this year. Yes, I think they will sign some FAs, but I wouldn't expect them to spend like drunken sailors.
What a Tuel Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 59 minutes ago, ColdFront_USAF said: Thanks for the correction. Was a bit too young to remember exactly how that went, I just knew we took Losman at 22. To be fair Donahoe was too chicken to trade up for Roethlisberger. So we did just let the pieces fall, and who was left? Losman and we still had to trade up to get him.
JM57 Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 18 hours ago, Domdab99 said: Moving up is sexy, it's fun, it's what's for dinner these days. But moving up will set the team's growth back three, maybe five years. Possibly longer. This team has so many holes, that to throw away all these picks on a QB who might be good is insanity. If we can somehow move up and still have 1 2nd and 1 3rd...I'd be willing to listen. But only for Rosen or Mayfield. Trading up for any of the other QBs is insanity. Especially since Jackson has a very good chance of being there at 12. Hell, he has a good chance of being there at 22. I'd rather pick an elite player at 12 - Roquan Smith, Derwin James, Vita Vea....etc. Use the rest of the picks on holes like WR, OL, DL, LB.... Throwing away this draft along with a first next next year? No thanks. I'm sure that it has been covered already in the multiple pages, but if ignoring holes at other positions to move up to #2 and fill the gaping hole at QB means no playoffs for 3 years, how do you explain the 2017 Rams and Eagles? The Bills are set up currently where they could do something very similar to what both of these teams did in the Goff/Wentz draft. That is, give up a bunch of picks in that draft class as collateral to get the QB the franchise thinks is The Guy. They'll have a challenging rookie season, no doubt, but that's likely to be the case no matter how many picks you make in that class. It's just a matter of learning on the job at the NFL level. Come next off-season, the team is flush with cap space and starts bringing in free agents on short term deals to plug those holes, even if only temporarily. Last I heard, the Bills had somewhere in the neighborhood of $100 million in cap space for 2019. Even without splurging on top free agents, that is more than enough space to sign guys to plug plenty of holes, then draft the rest. Not to mention, once you have fixed THE HOLE at QB, that helps to mask some of the other deficiencies. Get the guy. I'm sick of waiting for a franchise QB and even more sick of this team not even trying to get one.
row_33 Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 Jimmy G had a very soft slate of opponents, not to say he isn’t the real deal.
Batman1876 Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 (edited) 5 hours ago, #34fan said: He wasn't the last. AJ was picked up less than a month after winning his grievance against the Bengals and becoming a FA. Both Sam Bradford and Mike Glennon Signed contracts after that. As to why he's so cheap... Well, he's still got a lot to prove doesn't he? I think the money is right for where he's at in his career. So he’s s mystery who had a lot to prove. How often do guys like that turn into franchise QBs? And he signed after Bradford. Edited April 4, 2018 by Batman1876
SoTier Posted April 4, 2018 Posted April 4, 2018 (edited) 19 hours ago, Batman1876 said: Who was the last team to make it in the playoffs and contend year in and year out without a franchise QB? We’ve had years with talented rosters and we lost games because our QB was not good. Minnesota. Back in the late 1990s the Vikes went to the playoffs with Brad Johnson (1996 & 1997), Randall Cunningham (1998), Jeff George (1999), Daunte Culpepper (2000). Then they came back in the last decade to make the playoffs 5 out of the last 10 years despite not having an entrenched franchise QB in his prime: Gus Frerotte (2008), Favre (2009), Ponder (2012), Bridgewater (2015), and Keenum (2017). Furthermore, the Bills 17 years of playoff drought wasn't because they lacked a franchise QB. They failed to make the playoffs for so long primarily because of poor FO decisions, from selecting HCs to drafting players to decisions about which FAs to keep and which FAs to sign. The Bills had a franchise QB in Drew Bledsoe from 2002-2004, and failed to make the playoffs. The only year where you actually argue that better QBing would have put them in the playoffs was in 2014 when Marrone dumped Manuel and went with retirement list refugee Kyle Orton who played rather poorly toward the end of the season. Through most of the drought, the team didn't have enough talent on the sidelines or on the field to even be a playoff contender. Edited April 4, 2018 by SoTier 1
Recommended Posts