Bangarang Posted April 1, 2018 Posted April 1, 2018 3 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said: Um, the fact that it worked shows that there is indeed a proper way. And in any case, there've been many who sat and improved. He's the most obvious and best example but it's a pretty common thing. Are you just going to ignore the fact that Osweiler sat for years just like AR and still sucks? There is no proper way since they all yield mixed results. And just out of curiosity, who are these QBs who sat and improved like that?
Spiderweb Posted April 1, 2018 Posted April 1, 2018 18 hours ago, Bangarang said: Yes I’m being sarcastic. I am aware of what they did. My point is that coaches can read defenses without cheating. This whole “the Pats and Brady are good because they cheat” nonsense is old and lazy. What's old and lazy is believing that the cheating isn't the "edge" that has pushed a good well coached team over the top.
Bangarang Posted April 1, 2018 Posted April 1, 2018 2 hours ago, Spiderweb said: What's old and lazy is believing that the cheating isn't the "edge" that has pushed a good well coached team over the top. Who is saying that?
Recommended Posts