Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yes. The only reason I would knock some off is due to games missed each season. 

 

He’s the most dynamic offensive player in the NFL and genuinely does both the job of receiver and back.  

 

The fact that he also plays with Antonio is amazing. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

There is no RB worth 17M. You can replace that production with 2 decent RBs for way less. It's the one position where redundancy makes more sense than a superstar. 

  • Like (+1) 8
Posted
8 minutes ago, ndirish1978 said:

There is no RB worth 17M. You can replace that production with 2 decent RBs for way less. It's the one position where redundancy makes more sense than a superstar. 

Great post!

Posted

I don't know about $17 million, but Bell might be the only RB in the NFL where I'd argue that having him is better than having a good, cheap committee.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
10 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

No...no way I'm putting that much money in a RB.

 

Bills rely way too much on the RB as is.

 

Maybe if we go back to the 1970s this will pay off.

Posted

I don't think any players are worth 17 million a year unless they play QB. If I was the Steelers I would trade him. He could be replaced by a running back in the first round this year and their offense wouldn't skip a beat.

×
×
  • Create New...