Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

There's a lot of buzz going around that the Browns really like Allen and may take him 1st overall.

 

If this happens the Giants would likely take Sam Darnold 2nd and the Jets would select Josh Rosen 3rd overall.

 

Wow couldn't get any worse for the Bills. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Klaista2k said:

There's a lot of buzz going around that the Browns really like Allen and may take him 1st overall.

 

If this happens the Giants would likely take Sam Darnold 2nd and the Jets would select Josh Rosen 3rd overall.

 

Wow couldn't get any worse for the Bills. 

yes Lamar Jackson would be a disaster......oh boy

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, BillsEnthusiast said:

Not if the Bills trade up to 2 and take Darnold ourselves.

What makes you think the Giants will even trade down?

 

If they think a quarterback that they like may be there at 2 no way do they trade down. 

Just now, John from Riverside said:

yes Lamar Jackson would be a disaster......oh boy

Yeah because running quarterbacks always work out so great in the NFL :rolleyes:

Posted

For the sake of the Cleveland Brown's organization, as well as their loyal fanbase, I really, really, really hope they don't take Allen. Let the Jets screw up the pick!

Posted
13 minutes ago, Klaista2k said:

What makes you think the Giants will even trade down?

 

If they think a quarterback that they like may be there at 2 no way do they trade down. 

Yeah because running quarterbacks always work out so great in the NFL :rolleyes:

Its a good thing that lamar jackson likes to throw touchdowns as well huh?

 

Your research on this is so damn lazy

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I could see this happening, as Darnold would have won the job outright in training camp. It will be obvious that Darnold is the better QB. So bringing in Tyrod as a "bridge QB" does not make as much sense unless you want to go with the higher upside guy who is not ready to start or win a NFL QB job...Josh Allen. 

 

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, BillsEnthusiast said:

Not if the Bills trade up to 2 and take Darnold ourselves.

Because QB at all costs is the way to go.  Luckily it only applies to 31 teams and the Giants just happen to be the team that does not need to abide.

Posted

Gonna keep saying it in every thread that discusses the Browns as I have been for about 2 weeks.... all signs point to this even for the armchair QB. Dorsey was reported months ago to prefer Allen. They trade for a starter in TT. They call TT their starter for the year. Allen needs work and is a project, he sits for the year while TT plays. Drafting Darnold to ride the pine for a year makes no sense in light of any of this. Certainly could fall in love with Darnold and draft him but my money's on Allen.

Posted
2 minutes ago, zonabb said:

Gonna keep saying it in every thread that discusses the Browns as I have been for about 2 weeks.... all signs point to this even for the armchair QB. Dorsey was reported months ago to prefer Allen. They trade for a starter in TT. They call TT their starter for the year. Allen needs work and is a project, he sits for the year while TT plays. Drafting Darnold to ride the pine for a year makes no sense in light of any of this. Certainly could fall in love with Darnold and draft him but my money's on Allen.

 

You could say the same thing about the Giants with Manning, Jets with McCown/Bridgewater, and Broncos with Keenum. 

×
×
  • Create New...