SouthNYfan Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 Just now, aceman_16 said: Are you SURE that was the ONLY reason for that name? Lol j/k In that case it was ?
Misterbluesky Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 23 minutes ago, Seanbillsfan2206 said: Who the eff is Matt Miller Just another part time dart thrower.
BillsFan17 Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 If I can get Rosen at six I would do back flips. However, I really don't see him sliding down like that.
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted March 26, 2018 Author Posted March 26, 2018 1 minute ago, Seanbillsfan2206 said: This is why I think it’s total bull **** when people call mel kipper and Todd mcshay “hacks”. I agree it’s a very dedicated job and it’s actually impossible to be accurate. There’s just way too many different scenarios, teams have multiple needs, and just a difference of opinion throughout the league on players. I do give a lot of credit to the people who take the time to do these, but it’s really just pointless It's mostly for fun- sure. Teams do their own mocks, just like the media. Just playing out the different scenarios to get some kind of idea what could happen.
Blokestradamus Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 1 minute ago, Seanbillsfan2206 said: This is why I think it’s total bull **** when people call mel kipper and Todd mcshay “hacks”. I agree it’s a very dedicated job and it’s actually impossible to be accurate. There’s just way too many different scenarios, teams have multiple needs, and just a difference of opinion throughout the league on players. I do give a lot of credit to the people who take the time to do these, but it’s really just pointless All about those clicks. I spent 2 evenings studying film, making notes, making GIFs, wrote about 1500 words on a player matchup during the 2016 season. Might've got a couple hundred views. Spent half an hour on a basic mock draft - thousands of them. Coverage is idiotic because we demand it. 1
Lurker Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 Interesting. It would be very Bills-ey if they somehow got in position to draft Rosen and his career was subsequently cut short by injuries...
Seanbillsfan2206 Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 6 minutes ago, Blokestradamus said: All about those clicks. I spent 2 evenings studying film, making notes, making GIFs, wrote about 1500 words on a player matchup during the 2016 season. Might've got a couple hundred views. Spent half an hour on a basic mock draft - thousands of them. Coverage is idiotic because we demand it. Thanks for all you do 3 minutes ago, Lurker said: Interesting. It would be very Bills-ey if they somehow got in position to draft Rosen and his career was subsequently cut short by injuries... Or if they draft a cornerback instead... 3
section122 Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 21 minutes ago, Virgil said: That's only an 150 point overpayment, but I still don't like giving up both 1st's to jump to 6. I focus more on who it is given up for. Giving both for Rosen? All day. Both for a LB? That would be troublesome. 8 minutes ago, Blokestradamus said: All about those clicks. I spent 2 evenings studying film, making notes, making GIFs, wrote about 1500 words on a player matchup during the 2016 season. Might've got a couple hundred views. Spent half an hour on a basic mock draft - thousands of them. Coverage is idiotic because we demand it. I like the Billswire content but I click off as soon as I get to the bottom of slide one. The content is great but as a personal rule I don't do slide shows. Your stuff is generally very good though!
17 Josh Allen Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 20 minutes ago, Tatonka68 said: Rosen does not fit "THE PROCESS". Beane and McDerrott would never draft, especially trade picks for a player who will not fit into the culture. Sam Darnold, Josh Allen and Mason Rudolph are McBeane players. Bingo we have a winner. Mcbean will not even touch Rosen even if he was there in the 2nd round. The guy is a Bust waiting to happen. Ryan Leaf 2.0
NewEraBills Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 Honestly, one of the best scenarios we can hope for although the disgust of having to deal with the Colts again sucks. If it played out like this I wouldn't have any problem with it. I also agree, as stated this morning in another thread, I don't see the Browns passing up Barkley if he's there. You don't pass up perhaps the best offensive playmaker in the draft just because he plays the HB position.
Seanbillsfan2206 Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 3 minutes ago, Thurmanator 12074 said: Bingo we have a winner. Mcbean will not even touch Rosen even if he was there in the 2nd round. The guy is a Bust waiting to happen. Ryan Leaf 2.0 Does someone tie your shoes for you? Or do you have the velcro ones? 1
Mike in Horseheads Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 Millen never had a clue as GM for the lions, he should have stuck with TV 2
lookylookyherecomescookie Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 (edited) 43 minutes ago, Tatonka68 said: Rosen does not fit "THE PROCESS". Beane and McDerrott would never draft, especially trade picks for a player who will not fit into the culture. Sam Darnold, Josh Allen and Mason Rudolph are McBeane players. yes, but not one of these is a day one starter, which McBeane is clearly shooting for Edited March 26, 2018 by lookylookyherecomescookie mistype
gobills1212 Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 Best case senerio imo If they really like Rosen, they get their guy AND don't have to get to 2. I would guess he is why most people want 2. I feel like the only thing worse than not getting 2 is going up there and taking Allen. That wld make for a fun time around here!!
MrEpsYtown Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 1 hour ago, thenorthremembers said: So the Colts didnt trade us 3 because they didnt want to be outside the top ten, but they trade us 6? Also to get to six we shouldnt be giving up two 1sts. 12, 53 and a 4th. I think they wanna see if Chubb falls. If Chubb is gone, it makes sense for them to trade back. Miller had it 12, 22, and 96 I believe. Something like that.
John from Riverside Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 If all we gave up were our 1st round picks i would def love this trade....Josh Rosen is probably the best QB in this draft...... We better get our OL set up to protect him
MrEpsYtown Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 So strange that no one takes Mason Rudolph in the first. Weird....;)
K-9 Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 Makes sense and I could see it happening but I still won't believe it until I see the Giants passing on a QB.
outsidethebox Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 He predicts Rosen to be a Matt Ryan type Qb? Ughhhhh......? I want a Rodgers or Favre or Brady type Qb. Not a Ryan with an attitude. Say no to west coast Qb's!
DCOrange Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 1 hour ago, RPbillsfan said: Sorry, I'm a no go on this. 6th pick is rated at 1600 points on Draft Tek chard, 12 is at 1200, 22 is at 780. Why would we sacrifice 380 draft points which is equitable to a mid-range 2nd round pick to select concussion prone, slight of build Josh Rosen, who lacks pocket presence and is Rob Johnson 2.0 waiting to happen. Lets simply give away our future starting MLB to draft this guy. You must be kidding me. If you really want him, stay at 12 and with your future bust you can at least build the rest of your roster and hope AJ works out. You’re not even including #96, which Miller also includes in the trade to get to #6. This is a no-go for me personally. I don’t really want to trade for Rosen anyways, but even beyond that, this trade is a little rich for my blood personally.
Recommended Posts