ProcessTheTrust Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 At least Peterman played poorly enough for 99.9% of us to agree he's not the future. If he would have played almost mediocre, we would have a much larger debate. I don't think he's hopeless, anything can happen, but I'm sure glad he didn't leave us wondering about going for our guy right away. If you are in the 0.1% that wholeheartedly disagree and believe Peterman is our future, that's wonderful. I'm very proud of you. 2
John from Riverside Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 I think Nathan Peterman is going to improve to the point where he can be a reliable backup QB for us.......I have that hope for him. 5
ProcessTheTrust Posted March 26, 2018 Author Posted March 26, 2018 Just now, John from Riverside said: I think Nathan Peterman is going to improve to the point where he can be a reliable backup QB for us.......I have that hope for him. I think he just might. If he doesn't, it's really no big deal. 3rd stringers are a dime a dozen.
FappyTheClown Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, Sweats said: Good stuff going on here
LABILLBACKER Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 Peterman will be a very capable backup. A guy who can come in for a game or 2. A lot will depend on AJ and whoever we draft. I'm not using the Charger game as any barometer.
gobills1212 Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 Tough competition here with the Rudolph before Rosen thread for THREAD OF THE DAY .....although, the day isn't over yet.... 1
MAJBobby Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 I have faith in him to be what I thought he was going to be coming out of college. A very good BU QB
Formerly Allan in MD Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 13 minutes ago, ProcessTheTrust said: At least Peterman played poorly enough for 99.9% of us to agree he's not the future. If he would have played almost mediocre, we would have a much larger debate. I don't think he's hopeless, anything can happen, but I'm sure glad he didn't leave us wondering about going for our guy right away. If you are in the 0.1% that wholeheartedly disagree and believe Peterman is our future, that's wonderful. I'm very proud of you. Whatever you say. Anyone who feels the guy got thrown to the wolves with no preparation and experience could care less about your validation. 4
DC Tom Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 17 minutes ago, ProcessTheTrust said: At least Peterman played poorly enough for 99.9% of us to agree he's not the future. If he would have played almost mediocre, we would have a much larger debate. I don't think he's hopeless, anything can happen, but I'm sure glad he didn't leave us wondering about going for our guy right away. If you are in the 0.1% that wholeheartedly disagree and believe Peterman is our future, that's wonderful. I'm very proud of you. I don't know how I ever lived without this post. 1 1
HT02 Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 I don't think one bad start means his career is completely over either. I would consider him in the mix
BuffaloBillyG Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 He's a good kid. Easy to root for. I don't hold the Charger game against him as much as I do Dennison/Culley for clearly not having him ready. I think the game will slow down for him a bit. He will, I think one day be a capable BU.
Chuck Wagon Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 I was hoping you'd say "in a month all these Peterman truthers won't care about him anymore", but that works too.
Lfod Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 (edited) Peterman was drafted in a later round as an afterthought. Then he was tossed into a game too early to be the savior of a season. I agree with you that if he at least played mediocre there could be some debate. I disagree it was an ideal situation for him to start. Piss poor performing offence and all. If it makes you feel better to bring up his very awful debut and toss him in the dumpster so be it. If it helps you get through the day. I don't have any expectations but I haven't written him off and I don't think he was given a very fair chance. That's how I feel. I like Peterman better then Tyrod. At least Peterman went out swinging. Tyrod just held the ball until Jacksonville KOed him at the end of the game. Tyrod ran away while Peterman ran tword the goal. Reality check. The offense scored 3 points in a playoff game. They scored 3 points against the Panthers. They racked up 56 yarder vs the Saints. Dennisons fired and Tyrod's traded. We have a new offensive system and a new OC and a brand new back up QB to pretend to be a starter. We got bigger problems then Peterman right now. Edited March 26, 2018 by Lfod 1 1
Madd Charlie Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 10 minutes ago, Lfod said: Peterman was drafted in a later round as an afterthought. Then he was tossed into a game too early to be the savior of a season. I agree with you that if he at least played mediocre there could be some debate. I disagree it was an ideal situation for him to start. Piss poor performing offence and all. If it makes you feel better to bring up his very awful debut and toss him in the dumpster so be it. If it helps you get through the day. I don't have any expectations but I haven't written him off and I don't think he was given a very fair chance. That's how I feel. I like Peterman better then Tyrod. At least Peterman went out swinging. Tyrod just held the ball until Jacksonville KOed him at the end of the game. Tyrod ran away while Peterman ran tword the goal. So throwing ANOTHER weak arm interception towards one of the top CBs in the NFL on a potential game winning drive in the playoffs is "running tword the goal". I guess we all should be NFL QBs because absolutely anybody could have thrown that hot garbage
bobshaw81 Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 Trent Edwards 2.0. The out pattern where Ramsey intercepted him. Noodle arm. At least he seems to take more chances and pull the trigger than Tyrod, whether that's a good thing or bad.......At this point he is just another crappy backup until he can prove otherwise on the field in preseason.
Lfod Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Madd Charlie said: So throwing ANOTHER weak arm interception towards one of the top CBs in the NFL on a potential game winning drive in the playoffs is "running tword the goal". I guess we all should be NFL QBs because absolutely anybody could have thrown that hot garbage It was more entertaining then watching Tyrod dance around the back field the entire 4rth quarter in a 3 point game only game managing a bunch of 3 and outs. Peterman was only in the Playoffs game because Tyrod turned him self into a huge target with the ball super glued to his hands all game. He got knocked out. Oh and I think that last sack he took was for a loss. Edited March 26, 2018 by Lfod 1
Homey D. Clown Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 good 'ol fashioned "Face Palm". I'm so happy talent can now be evaluated with only a 1.5 game body of work. Why do so many other talent scouts ever get it wrong? 1
SoCal Deek Posted March 26, 2018 Posted March 26, 2018 Leave Peterman alone. The kid was a rookie mid-to-late round draft pick and the team put him in one week's notice, on the road, after a disastrous two week performance from the 'starters'. Then his fullback sets up a volleyball for the Chargers to intercept, and a few minutes later he loses his Number One receiver to a knee injury. Buffalo always like a good underdog story. Common Nathan....prove all of the haters wrong! 5
Recommended Posts