Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

 

70 years of NFL football says he isn't going #1 ...

 

I love Baker and think he's a stud , he isn't going #1 overall 

Is this the height issue? Because if it is, and you are trying to make a case for Rosen you have to know what I'm going to say about that.

Posted
1 minute ago, Tyrod's friend said:

Is this the height issue? Because if it is, and you are trying to make a case for Rosen you have to know what I'm going to say about that.

 

Im not making a case for any QB.

 

Fact is only 1 QB shorter than 6'2 has been drafted top 3 in modern NFL history... Michael Vick 

 

again can you not read when I say I LOVE BAKER MAYFIELD.... No GM has the balls to draft him first overall. I'd wager anything 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

No one will ever foret the day the Bills traded for the #1 pick. I'll just keep stacking the bread crumbs.

Edited by Lfod
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

LOL!!!!!! They must've had a practice session with Taylor and thought holy **** what did we do. I'm starting to think more and more that Barkley will be the 1st pick in the draft and the Giant take Chubb leaving the Jets with the 1st QB selection. The Giants won the Super Bowl because of having two edge rushes who can just destroy QB's. I can't see the Giants passing on Chubb.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Buffalo716 said:

 

Im not making a case for any QB.

 

Fact is only 1 QB shorter than 6'2 has been drafted top 3 in modern NFL history... Michael Vick 

 

again can you not read when I say I LOVE BAKER MAYFIELD.... No GM has the balls to draft him first overall. I'd wager anything 


great. We'll see how this plays out. And yeah, I know you love the guy. Personally, I don't love the guy. I'd point out that the team with the first pick in the draft already HAS a QB that is shorter than 6'2" and they went out of their way to get him. 

But he's off the board before the second pick is called. 

Cheers.

Posted (edited)

This means nothing.  Tyrod is on a 1 year deal.  Any QB they take at 1 is sitting the first 10 games at least.  Stanton will be Tyrod's backup this year and Darnold's backup next year.  

Edited by BuffaloRebound
Posted
Just now, BuffaloRebound said:

This means nothing.  Tyrod is on a 1 year deal.  Any QB they take at 1 is sitting the first 10 games at least.  Stanton will be Tyron's backup this year and Darnold's backup next year.  

 

This is the most plausible explanation. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

It is sort of a puzzling signing.  Hogan and Kessler are gone via trade or release as picks from another regime. 

I’d rather Kessler than Peterman (not that either is very good). 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Tyrod's friend said:


great. We'll see how this plays out. And yeah, I know you love the guy. Personally, I don't love the guy. I'd point out that the team with the first pick in the draft already HAS a QB that is shorter than 6'2" and they went out of their way to get him. 

But he's off the board before the second pick is called. 

Cheers.

 

We will see..

.

and TT was a 6th round pick... not first overall 

Edited by Buffalo716
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Alphadawg7 said:

Browns have said Taylor is a good starter with upside and he's their guy.  

 

Can you imagine what the Browns fans would do if they stuck with TT and passed on a QB at 1 and 4???  HAHAHAHA, I have a friend who is a Browns fan, and I would laugh my ass off cuz he would be so pissed.

 

I still think there is zero percent change they pass on a QB twice, but it was interesting comments the Browns made after trading for TT.  Personally, I would take Barkley at 1 and Baker at 4.  But if they go QB at 1, and its Darnold, they might still land Barkely at 4 if Giants trade down or go Chubb.

The Browns HC said Taylor is the starting QB, and there won't be an open competition for the job. i.e. The rookie will sit. Not a bad thing imo . They're going QB at 1 though. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Tyrod's friend said:


I'll take that bet. Go ahead and give me odds. He's #1, and he's #1 going away. Best QB in this draft and it isn't even close. 

 

I'll take the bet.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Dear fan(s),

Why have 3 bad QBs when you can have 4 ? 

Love, Hue

Hue's not making the calls. The new GM is. This signing is difficult to understand especially if the Browns were going to use their first or fourth pick for a qb. The signing of Stanton would have made sense if the Browns didn't sign Taylor. However, this signing makes some sense if the Browns are determined not to play their drafted qb (assuming they use one of their first round picks for a qb) in his  rookie year. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Tyrod's friend said:


I'll take that bet. Go ahead and give me odds. He's #1, and he's #1 going away. Best QB in this draft and it isn't even close. 

I give ya this.. ya know what ya like and ya don't back down or care what the world thinks.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...