Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, FrankoElTanko said:

How could he NOT be in the wrong. If you are that naive then you should try the theory. It is the Super Bowl, I assume there will be some sort of evidence to show he pushed through the area and I am sure the PUSH is likely exaggerated. However, lets ignore the physical contact and agree that in order to even be accused of physical contact he would have had ignored her and already began to enter an area he was TOLD NOT TO ENTER. Making him wrong, or at least liable for whatever ensues as a result of the trespass. Now back to the fact that there may or may not have been contact... She is an elderly disabled woman without the use of her lower body and he a 6'4" 275lb professional athlete who blatantly entered an area he was told not to... There is no way he is found to be justified in ANYTHING to come of his presence. 

 

Believe it or not, people are not hunting for reasons to crucify him and make him some kind of spiritual martyr for as holes. It may hurt a little bit but he just is kind of a diq.

Well the NFL said he had a credential so it's impossible for him to trespass. Second the push was to her in a motorized wheelchair that weighed 700lbs. He didn't knock her over. He pushed her chair. She said she has a shoulder sprain and needed pain meds for it. Clearly this is a money grab. It's so clear IDK how anyone can see it any different. If Bennett paid this women last year there would be no case.

13 minutes ago, Eric Moulds on my A** said:

“He said, ‘You all must not know who I am,'” Acevedo said of Michael Bennett. “‘I could own this [place]. I’m going onto the field whether you like it or not.'”

 

 

He did? No Way! How do these peasants not know of the great Michael Bennett, the axis in which our world turns? 

 

 

This is a reason to prosecute someone for a 10yr felony? Jesus I hope they never see me drunk on Chippewa.

Posted
45 minutes ago, #34fan said:

 

:lol: Just because he's proven innocent doesn't make him NOT a douchebag.... Just because he's guilty doesn't mean he wasn't provoked by some jagoff disabled person.

 

The disabled aren't always good people.

Sticks and stones will hurt my bones. 

 

If Michael Bennet is this easily provoked by an elderly woman calling him names than I will gladly call him worse to his face. He's a little B word

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

Well the NFL said he had a credential so it's impossible for him to trespass. Second the push was to her in a motorized wheelchair that weighed 700lbs. He didn't knock her over. He pushed her chair. She said she has a shoulder sprain and needed pain meds for it. Clearly this is a money grab. It's so clear IDK how anyone can see it any different. If Bennett paid this women last year there would be no case.

This is a reason to prosecute someone for a 10yr felony? Jesus I hope they never see me drunk on Chippewa.

are you actually serious? all the swill you  are posting about this??  you really arent making  much of a "case" other than sounding  ridiculous.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, dwight in philly said:

are you actually serious? all the swill you  are posting about this??  you really arent making  much of a "case" other than sounding  ridiculous.

I'm just giving the facts of the case. Sorry you don't like them.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

I'm just giving the facts of the case. Sorry you don't like them.

ok  F  Lee Bailey .. getting charged with a felony .. guess you are right, the DA, Grand Jury  are wrong. 

Edited by dwight in philly
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, dwight in philly said:

ok  F  Lee Bailey .. getting charged with a felony .. guess you are right, the DA is wrong. 

Where did I say I was right in that post? I told you what happened. Those are the facts of the case. If I had to guess I'd say you know nothing about the fact of the case. Also charges are dropped in money grabs all the time. If Bennett pays the women she'll stop being a witness and the case will go away.

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

Where did I say I was right in that post? I told you what happened. Those are the facts of the case. If I had to guess I'd say you know nothing about the fact of the case. Also charges are dropped in money grabs all the time. If Bennett pays the women she'll stop being a witness and the case will go away.

 you are correct , i dont know the specifics of the case other than what is out there. sounds like you are the judge and jury.. Money Grab.. Bailiff. call the next case. 

Edited by dwight in philly
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

Sticks and stones will hurt my bones. 

 

If Michael Bennet is this easily provoked by an elderly woman calling him names than I will gladly call him worse to his face.

 

Exactly.... Now multiply yourself x 10,000... Handicapped or not I bet it gets old...

 

I don't know the details, but I'd like to hear more to have an accurate opinion.

Edited by #34fan
Posted
2 minutes ago, #34fan said:

 

Exactly.... Now multiply yourself x 10,000... Handicapped or not I bet it gets old...

 

I don't know the details, but I'd like to hear more to have an accurate opinion.

We have to trust the grand jury that there was enough to press charges, though that doesn't say much. But the legal system is here to run its course. something like this, 14 months later I'm going to tend to believe that this incident did occur

Posted
Just now, Jpsredemption said:

Why because he fasely accused the LVPD of misconduct? When he yet again was doing whatever he wanted?

 

Yes. That's exactly why. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

Would be fitting. The lead witness for the woman is a cop. So let the blacks verse cops **** storm begin.

And before anyone says it. I know the 66yr old is a black woman.

Ahhhh, this all makes sense.  Remember what Stephen A Smith said when Ray Rice cold cocked his fiancee...sometimes, they just make ya wanna punch em.  Might wanna bring him in as an expert witness.

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

So we must be your hero or something. Sorry if I don't give a **** what a majority of NFL players who probably can't even spell cat think.

 

By the way it's only obvious that you would be the one to post something like this, trying to defend the douchebag

1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Yes. That's exactly why. 

Hey Boy Wonder, how about instead of just this vapid response of hot air that you tend to stick with you tell him what he is wrong. Because he's exactly right he accuse a Las Vegas Police of something that was 100% not factually true. Maybe you missed it because it wasn't on Twitter, but really there's a lot of things you should just shut the hell up on if you're going to be such an !@#$

Edited by Boyst62
Posted
1 hour ago, CuddyDark said:

It's worse than that. She was in a wheelchair than never moved. He never pushed her to the ground. She has a "sprained" shoulder. The entire thing is over money. It's clearly malicious prosecution.

 

:lol: You should see this old bitty by the beach near me... She literally GUNS that E-Z ride into pedestrians.

Posted
20 minutes ago, dwight in philly said:

 you are correct , i dont know the specifics of the case other than what is out there. sounds like you are the judge and jury.. Money Grab.. Bailiff. call the next case. 

I stated what actually happened. It goes against your narrative so you're upset. I get it.

×
×
  • Create New...