Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Doc Brown said:

That's why I find the victory by Conner Lamb so important.  Not that he won a Congress seat, but he provided the blue print on how to win.  Pushing for strong unions, agreeing with Trump on tariffs, conveying an economic populist message (lower taxes on middle to lower class and raising them on the wealthy), stabilizing health care markets,  distancing himself from Pelosi, not playing identity politics, etc...  You have to give people a reason to vote for you and the Trump is evil strategy won't work.

 

So basically what you're saying is Democrats should go back to what they were before the early/mid 2000s when most everyone with a (D) after their name developed a severe case of Bush Derangement Syndrome

Posted
Just now, /dev/null said:

 

So basically what you're saying is Democrats should go back to what they were before the early/mid 2000s when most everyone with a (D) after their name developed a severe case of Bush Derangement Syndrome

BDS is nowhere near TDS, but yes.  That was largely what Obama's platform was in 2008 (along with ending the wars) and he won by almost 10 million votes and got 365 electoral votes.  Along with a supermajority in the Senate for a few months.

Posted
3 hours ago, Doc said:

 

After hearing about Marla Maples, everyone should have known that The Donald was/going to continue having affairs.  And that Melania was another trophy wife.

 

Has anyone considered the possibility that Melania is aware with Donald's marital transgressions and might be OK with it?  It was part of the package from day 1? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Has anyone considered the possibility that Melania is aware with Donald's marital transgressions and might be OK with it?  It was part of the package from day 1? 

 

Yes, intelligent people have....:thumbsup:

 

 

But that rules out the OP and several others.

 

 

.

Posted
58 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Has anyone considered the possibility that Melania is aware with Donald's marital transgressions and might be OK with it?  It was part of the package from day 1? 

 

hahaha, has anyone considered the possibility that Melania is sometimes a participant? Hmmm....

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, keepthefaith said:

Has anyone considered the possibility that Melania is aware with Donald's marital transgressions and might be OK with it?  It was part of the package from day 1? 

 

It's probably what Tom said about the "arrangement" between Slick and Hilly, i.e. do what you want but don't embarrass me.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

It's probably what Tom said about the "arrangement" between Slick and Hilly, i.e. do what you want but don't embarrass me.

 

Or rather, "I'm gonna do what I want. I'll try not to embarrass you"

×
×
  • Create New...