DC Tom Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 1 hour ago, 100DollarBills said: Simulation theory is a branch of physics. No, it's not. If you're trying to prove you're not an idiot, you're failing spectacularly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sodbuster Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 3 hours ago, 100DollarBills said: Well I'm sorry you feel that way. An open mind wouldn't hurt, especially with many physicists supporting multiverse and simulation theory. Honestly I don't know how much of it to believe, but I do remember some of my hardcore childhood memories. Ha, have an open mind. This pseudoscientific theory exists simply because people can't accept the fact that they misremembered a few pieces of meaningless trivia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 54 minutes ago, sodbuster said: Ha, have an open mind. This pseudoscientific theory exists simply because people can't accept the fact that they misremembered a few pieces of meaningless trivia. That’s what our cultures have shriveled up to. and it wasThe Moops Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
100DollarBills Posted March 23, 2018 Author Share Posted March 23, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: No, it's not. If you're trying to prove you're not an idiot, you're failing spectacularly. Did you even watch the video? Simulation theory is under the intial foundation of physics with Ontology. Ontology is a prerequisite for the understanding of what is real. It's the very foundation of what is the material world. There are a lot of physicist out there that believe the simulation theory is a reasonable interpretation of our reality. Elon Musk is also on board the simulation train. If we can ever manage to get robots to achieve consciousness, you can bet all your money we live in some sort of simulation. 9 minutes ago, row_33 said: That’s what our cultures have shriveled up to. and it wasThe Moops Because modern science cannot explain how the big bang created itself out of nothing, which would break the rules of physics. The minute we can create lifeforms from inorganic material, I will start believing in our bogus interpretation of life. Edited March 23, 2018 by 100DollarBills Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 People misheard song lyrics oh my goodness, this is more valuable than anything Newton or Einstein ever did Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
100DollarBills Posted March 23, 2018 Author Share Posted March 23, 2018 2 hours ago, row_33 said: People misheard song lyrics oh my goodness, this is more valuable than anything Newton or Einstein ever did Just because new theories of our universe are being discussed doesn't mean the contributions of Newton or Einstein are any less important. The quantum world and particle physics is opening the possibility of new theories. The materialist have a hard time fitting their theories around consciousness and particle behavior. Idealism is making a comeback. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 11 hours ago, 100DollarBills said: Did you even watch the video? Simulation theory is under the intial foundation of physics with Ontology. Ontology is a prerequisite for the understanding of what is real. It's the very foundation of what is the material world. There are a lot of physicist out there that believe the simulation theory is a reasonable interpretation of our reality. Elon Musk is also on board the simulation train. If we can ever manage to get robots to achieve consciousness, you can bet all your money we live in some sort of simulation. I'm a physicist. I don't need a !@#$ing YouTube video to tell me what is and is not physics. And that is not physics. 11 hours ago, 100DollarBills said: Because modern science cannot explain how the big bang created itself out of nothing, which would break the rules of physics. No, it doesn't, and yes, it can. What's more, it doesn't need to. Source: I'm a physicist, and you're a goddamn idiot. 10 minutes ago, 100DollarBills said: Just because new theories of our universe are being discussed doesn't mean the contributions of Newton or Einstein are any less important. The quantum world and particle physics is opening the possibility of new theories. The materialist have a hard time fitting their theories around consciousness and particle behavior. "Particle behavior?" The !@#$ is this nonsense? There is NO difficulty describing that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 11 hours ago, 100DollarBills said: Because modern science cannot explain how the big bang created itself out of nothing, which would break the rules of physics. The minute we can create lifeforms from inorganic material, I will start believing in our bogus interpretation of life. What did God create life from? Dust and then a rib. BAZINGA!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
100DollarBills Posted March 23, 2018 Author Share Posted March 23, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: I'm a physicist. I don't need a !@#$ing YouTube video to tell me what is and is not physics. And that is not physics. No, it doesn't, and yes, it can. What's more, it doesn't need to. Source: I'm a physicist, and you're a goddamn idiot. "Particle behavior?" The !@#$ is this nonsense? There is NO difficulty describing that. I don't know what to tell you. Go listen to Sylvester James Jones, George Smoot, Elon Musk, etc. String theory and Quantum mechanics leaves a lot of possibilities for multiverses, holographic universe, simulated universe. What I'm talking about particle behavior is the uncertainty principle, and how particles are probalistic in their observed location, ask Heisenberg and Schrodinger. Edited March 23, 2018 by 100DollarBills Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 Alternate reality. Which direction does water swirl down a sink? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
100DollarBills Posted March 23, 2018 Author Share Posted March 23, 2018 Just now, ShadyBillsFan said: What did God create life from? Dust and then a rib. BAZINGA!!!! I think we have been designed in a simulation, we are the product of some advanced civilizations quantum computers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 Does the Sun rise or the Earth rotate? Just now, 100DollarBills said: I think we have been designed in a simulation, we are the product of some advanced civilizations quantum computers. Now I know this is all a big joke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
100DollarBills Posted March 23, 2018 Author Share Posted March 23, 2018 1 minute ago, ShadyBillsFan said: Does the Sun rise or the Earth rotate? Rotate lol, I'm not a flat Earther either lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section122 Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 6 minutes ago, 100DollarBills said: I think we have been designed in a simulation, we are the product of some advanced civilizations quantum computers. Can I ask a few questions? How old are you? (serious) How many times have you watched the matrix? (not serious) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
100DollarBills Posted March 23, 2018 Author Share Posted March 23, 2018 (edited) 9 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said: Does the Sun rise or the Earth rotate? Now I know this is all a big joke. It would explain a lot of things, we are an imperfect creation that has a lot of problems that would be created from an imperfect civilization. Edited March 23, 2018 by 100DollarBills Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section122 Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 3 minutes ago, 100DollarBills said: It would explain a lot of things, we are an imperfect creation that has a lot of problems that would be created from an imperfect civilization. except for some reason, in your mind, your memory is not imperfect... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
100DollarBills Posted March 23, 2018 Author Share Posted March 23, 2018 (edited) 6 minutes ago, section122 said: Can I ask a few questions? How old are you? (serious) How many times have you watched the matrix? (not serious) 28. I've watch the Matrix maybe 5 times. I don't base my rationale on that movie, but I bet it's not to far off. The main question is, if we truly are a simulation, do we have a form outside the program, or is our consciousness downloaded. We could have volunteered or forced, who knows. Edited March 23, 2018 by 100DollarBills Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 13 minutes ago, 100DollarBills said: 28. I've watch the Matrix maybe 5 times. I don't base my rationale on that movie, but I bet it's not to far off. The main question is, if we truly are a simulation, do we have a form outside the program, or is our consciousness downloaded. We could have volunteered or forced, who knows. What is your profession? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
100DollarBills Posted March 23, 2018 Author Share Posted March 23, 2018 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Jauronimo said: What is your profession? Engineering. I think in our simulated world, we are programmed with advanced decision tree logic, giving the appearance of free will but also feeling somewhat predetermined. Edited March 23, 2018 by 100DollarBills Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 1 hour ago, 100DollarBills said: What I'm talking about particle behavior is the uncertainty principle, and how particles are probalistic in their observed location, ask Heisenberg and Schrodinger. That's well-described. Again, I'M A PHYSICIST. I know this stuff. I'm published on the subject (quantum and statistical physics). You are worse than ignorant on the subject. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.