Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

at first i was upset by this news, but now that i am examining the details this might be a good thing.  they only received a 3rd so that's not enough to disuade them from trading back and collecting more picks.  also, by trading him they are saying we are going to get the right pieces to fit our 3-4 defense in the draft so they will want more picks to be able to do so.  at the very least, it says that they checked out the QB's and after doing so they have decided that it will not be high on their priority list so they will be addressing other areas of need and this is the first move in doing so.

 

Edited by kdiggz
Posted

So many ways to look at this......

 

Opens up another hole in a team that is full of holes. An additional 3rd rounder won't get you an impact-full DE that can pressure the QB unless they get lucky. Opens up the possibility of moving down drafting an impact-full DE like Marcus Davenport at 12 (a younger, cheaper Jason Pierre-Paul), and still have another 1st with Bills pick 22, 2 seconds, and now 3 thirds.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, BillsFan2313 said:

Just freeing up space for Shady....

This may be the case..

 

But Hughes or Lawson as well

Edited by Reed83HOF
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

This is not necessarily bad news for Buffalo.

 

If they did it for Chubb it means we can rule out them either taking a QB or trading out to someone else that wants one. So Darnold goes 1 and Chubb 2. It really wouldn't shock me to see the Jets go Allen at 3. I'd think Browns would either be open for trade or go Barkley at 4. This all drops Nelson to the Broncos at 5 and they possible go Mike White or Falk or Lauletta later on. That would put Indy at 6 without a chance at Chubb, possibly open for business far cheaper than getting to 2 where we can move for Rosen if he's the guy. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

i know a lot of people are now saying Chubb is their target but how about Marcus Davenport who should be available at 12?  stand up DE who would fit a 3-4

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
20 minutes ago, TheBeane said:

Hmmm.... Maybe they'd want Hughes?

This is the first thing that came to mind when I read this post. I would hate to lose Hughes because I think he is top pass rusher but we need to lighten the blow for moving up to the 2nd pick.

Posted
Just now, Bray Wyatt said:

Shaq lawson is a better fit in a 3-4 no? also has a low cap hit, maybe he is involved in the trade up

I actually think he’s Better in a 4-3 but still, decent idea 

Posted
5 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

Thanks for the attempt at optimism. I have been very pessimistic since the Jets trade up and remain so. #12 is  huge problem to overcome with a limited number of Elite prospects at the top.

scenarios I don't like:

1. Darnold goes first, Rosen second, Mayfield third we are !@#$ed with the guys who could play soon.

2. Darnold, Barkley goes 2, Rosen goes 3, Chubb to Browns, Mayfield to Broncos

3.Darnold, Chubb, Rosen, Barkley, Mayfield

I think we are big trouble unless you want Allen perhaps. I don't this high.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, kdiggz said:

i know a lot of people are now saying Chubb is their target but how about Marcus Davenport who should be available at 12?  stand up DE who would fit a 3-4

You might have nailed that....They can have Shaq as well

Edited by Reed83HOF
×
×
  • Create New...