transplantbillsfan Posted March 22, 2018 Author Posted March 22, 2018 5 hours ago, DCOrange said: There's simply no way to convince someone that Allen won't suck because there is plenty of potential for him to. But for a fan base that has had roughly an average QB for the past few years and decided that they're sick of average, I find it kind of odd that so many want to avoid taking one of the 2 or 3 QBs that has a legitimate shot at being an elite QB. Probably because he resembles EJ Manuel... raw but with all the physical attributes to play the position.
GoBills808 Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: Probably because he resembles EJ Manuel... raw but with all the physical attributes to play the position. He doesn't resemble Manuel at all IMO. They're just both big and tall. Allen is on a different planet in terms of arm strength, release, velocity, throwing motion...the QB specific traits. Comping him to Manuel is lazy at best.
jrober38 Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: He doesn't resemble Manuel at all IMO. They're just both big and tall. Allen is on a different planet in terms of arm strength, release, velocity, throwing motion...the QB specific traits. Comping him to Manuel is lazy at best. Allen is a pretty good comparison to Kyle Boller or Jake Locker. Both were huge busts. 1
HappyDays Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 6 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: You can keep repeating this as long as you like, but it's just not true. This was written about Stafford pre-draft: " Too often leads his receivers too far or forces them to reach back, slowing their momentum and limiting their ability to generate yardage after the catch." Stafford didn't have elite accuracy but he clearly had adequate accuracy. I'm not saying he's the most accurate prospect in a generation but he was miles ahead of where Josh Allen is now. His scouting report specifically mentioned accuracy to all areas of the field as a strength. He was less consistent than would be ideal but it was not a complete mess like Allen's is. If Stafford had a game as bad as Allen's against Boise St I'd like to see it.
GoBills808 Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 Just now, jrober38 said: Allen is a pretty good comparison to Kyle Boller or Jake Locker. Both were huge busts. I'll go with Stafford or Favre. They were pretty good.
sven233 Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 He's a guy that has every physical tool you dream about a QB having. That said, I have watched a lot of him and he is slow to process the field, he's late on throws all the time (gets away with it because of his arm in college, but probably won't in the NFL), and he bails out of the pocket way too early, way too often. If you watch him, a lot of the "wow" throws he makes, which are impressive, are unnecessary in a lot of ways. I mean, this might be a bit of a stretch, but he is a lot like Tyrod in terms of reading the field and bailing out too early. Because he is slow through his reads, he bails out of the pocket a lot, even if there is no pressure, WAITS to see guys come open and then throws. Taylor had the same problems having to wait to see guys come open. Allen gets away with it more because of his arm strength, but he is not a guy that throws guys open a ton and the ball comes out real late too many times for my liking. That is where the comparisons to Taylor ends because Allen is a superior passer for sure, but the way he reads the field, bails out early, and has to wait for guys to come open to throw many times is very concerning to me. Give me a guy that moves around in the pocket, slides up, and steps into a throw any day over Allen. Allen may turn out to be good someday because, as I said, he has every tool you look for. But there are more things that concern me than don't and I would be much more comfortable with several other guys in this class before him. Right now, he's behind Darnold, Rosen, and Mayfield.....at least. Maybe even Jackson. There are much better options in this draft and I hope the Bills see it too.
jrober38 Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: I'll go with Stafford or Favre. They were pretty good. I don't see it. Stafford was a lot more polished coming out of college. No one ever questioned his accuracy. He's got Farve's arm and the same hero, but I don't think he's the same type of play maker. Most big, strong, bazooka armed QBs have great tools but don't know how to do them. I think that's the case with Allen. The game tape doesn't lie. Edited March 22, 2018 by jrober38
HappyDays Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: I'll go with Stafford or Favre. They were pretty good. It's a problem when one of your examples was drafted in 1991, and the other - even ignoring my disagreement with the comparison - hasn't won a single playoff game in his 9-season career. And those are the best comparisons you could come up with!
transplantbillsfan Posted March 22, 2018 Author Posted March 22, 2018 4 hours ago, thebandit27 said: Congrats on defaulting to a lazy argument instead of considering the point of the post. Does his completion percentage need to improve? Yes. Can it? Absolutely; guys do it all the time in the NFL. Josh McCown was a 51% passer in college; he completed 67% of his passes last year. What I want to know is if you actually watched the kid? When does he have accuracy issues? When he's under immediate duress, and when his footwork gets leaky trying to rush the ball to the perimeter--are those fatal flaws, or can they be corrected? Let's go man, put a reasonable argument together that doesn't amount to "COMPLETION PERCENTAGE!!1!!1!1!!" Are we really condemning the kid to doom because he was 1% less accurate in college than Matthew Stafford and 3% less accurate in college than Carson Palmer? This is all fine and dandy, the problem is he's going to be a high 1st round draft pick (unless there's been a whooOOOoooolllee lotta smokescreening, which wouldn't surprise me), rather than a mid round pick, which is where project QBs who are raw and need a ton of good coaching to reach their full potential are generally drafted... or should be. And one would think our fan base learned that from the last dude we overdrafted in the 1st round. 1
GoBills808 Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 Just now, jrober38 said: I don't see it. Stafford was a lot more polished coming out of college. No one ever questioned his accuracy. He's got Farve's arm and the same hero, but I don't think he's the same type of play maker. Untrue about Stafford's accuracy. There were questions about his accuracy as I've been explaining to HappyDays. I'll agree that he was more polished a passer than Allen, but I think Allen has an edge on him physically. I'm not saying Allen is going to be good, even though I'm a fan. I'm saying there are enough reasons to think he MAY be that I wouldn't hate it if the Bills drafted him at all.
jrober38 Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 1 minute ago, HappyDays said: It's a problem when one of your examples was drafted in 1991, and the other - even ignoring my disagreement with the comparison - hasn't won a single playoff game in his 9-season career. And those are the best comparisons you could come up with! Elite NFL QBs have elite accuracy. Very few of them had the elite "tools" Allen brings to the table, so I don't understand why people drool over guys like him every year. Just now, GoBills808 said: Untrue about Stafford's accuracy. There were questions about his accuracy as I've been explaining to HappyDays. I'll agree that he was more polished a passer than Allen, but I think Allen has an edge on him physically. I'm not saying Allen is going to be good, even though I'm a fan. I'm saying there are enough reasons to think he MAY be that I wouldn't hate it if the Bills drafted him at all. NFL.com's assessment disagreed. "Consistent with excellent accuracy to all levels of the field." http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/matthew-stafford?id=79860
GoBills808 Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, HappyDays said: It's a problem when one of your examples was drafted in 1991, and the other - even ignoring my disagreement with the comparison - hasn't won a single playoff game in his 9-season career. And those are the best comparisons you could come up with! Stafford? Yeah I'd take him in a heartbeat...you really going qbwinz here? 1 minute ago, jrober38 said: Elite NFL QBs have elite accuracy. Very few of them had the elite "tools" Allen brings to the table, so I don't understand why people drool over guys like him every year. NFL.com's assessment disagreed. "Consistent with excellent accuracy to all levels of the field." http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/matthew-stafford?id=79860 They also said "Too often leads his receivers too far or forces them to reach back, slowing their momentum and limiting their ability to generate yardage after the catch" about Stafford.
thebandit27 Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 3 minutes ago, jrober38 said: Elite NFL QBs have elite accuracy. Very few of them had the elite "tools" Allen brings to the table, so I don't understand why people drool over guys like him every year. NFL.com's assessment disagreed. "Consistent with excellent accuracy to all levels of the field." http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/matthew-stafford?id=79860 It's in the exact same link: "Sloppy footwork. ... Will get lazy and throw off his back foot, which could lead to turnovers in the NFL... ... Willing to throw into tight spots, though more often than not he places the ball where it needs to be... ... Not great accuracy on crossing routes. ... Too often leads his receivers too far or forces them to reach back, slowing their momentum and limiting their ability to generate yardage after the catch."
GoBills808 Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 Just now, thebandit27 said: It's in the exact same link: "Sloppy footwork. ... Will get lazy and throw off his back foot, which could lead to turnovers in the NFL... ... Willing to throw into tight spots, though more often than not he places the ball where it needs to be... ... Not great accuracy on crossing routes. ... Too often leads his receivers too far or forces them to reach back, slowing their momentum and limiting their ability to generate yardage after the catch." Get outta here, we're reading and quoting selectively dammit! (I'm doing it too btw)
JohnC Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 3 hours ago, HappyDays said: If we had drafted Mahomes we'd have a total unknown getting ready to start for a team with one of the worst receiving corps in football. If we had drafted Watson we'd have a guy who showed promise, but also had the 3rd worst INT rate among starting QBs and just tore his 2nd ACL in 4 years. The grass is always greener until you take a closer look. The grass is greener on the other side of the fence especially when you don't have grass. As I said in another post don't let the seeking of perfection get in the way of seeking good. The ideal usually doesn't represent reality.
HappyDays Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: Stafford? Yeah I'd take him in a heartbeat...you really going qbwinz here? I like Stafford but the problem is he's the only QB from this millennium that you can even try to draw a comparison from. I'll stand by what I said, Allen is not comparable to Stafford. I'll agree that this is the best positive comparison you can make to Allen but it isn't a particularly good one, and there are numerous negative comparisons you can point to. The historical data is pretty clear on this - QBs like Allen do not suddenly fix their ball placement in the NFL.
Dr. Who Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 14 minutes ago, sven233 said: He's a guy that has every physical tool you dream about a QB having. That said, I have watched a lot of him and he is slow to process the field, he's late on throws all the time (gets away with it because of his arm in college, but probably won't in the NFL), and he bails out of the pocket way too early, way too often. If you watch him, a lot of the "wow" throws he makes, which are impressive, are unnecessary in a lot of ways. I mean, this might be a bit of a stretch, but he is a lot like Tyrod in terms of reading the field and bailing out too early. Because he is slow through his reads, he bails out of the pocket a lot, even if there is no pressure, WAITS to see guys come open and then throws. Taylor had the same problems having to wait to see guys come open. Allen gets away with it more because of his arm strength, but he is not a guy that throws guys open a ton and the ball comes out real late too many times for my liking. That is where the comparisons to Taylor ends because Allen is a superior passer for sure, but the way he reads the field, bails out early, and has to wait for guys to come open to throw many times is very concerning to me. Give me a guy that moves around in the pocket, slides up, and steps into a throw any day over Allen. Allen may turn out to be good someday because, as I said, he has every tool you look for. But there are more things that concern me than don't and I would be much more comfortable with several other guys in this class before him. Right now, he's behind Darnold, Rosen, and Mayfield.....at least. Maybe even Jackson. There are much better options in this draft and I hope the Bills see it too. I'm not against drafting him if OBD determines he is worth the risk. I kind of like him, but this seems to me a fair, well-reasoned argument.
thebandit27 Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, HappyDays said: I like Stafford but the problem is he's the only QB from this millennium that you can even try to draw a comparison from. I'll stand by what I said, Allen is not comparable to Stafford. I'll agree that this is the best positive comparison you can make to Allen but it isn't a particularly good one, and there are numerous negative comparisons you can point to. The historical data is pretty clear on this - QBs like Allen do not suddenly fix their ball placement in the NFL. Why do you keep repeating this idea? Plenty of QBs have gotten significantly more accurate as NFLers, and Staff isn't the only example from recent years I've given multiple others in this very thread
GoBills808 Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 1 minute ago, HappyDays said: I like Stafford but the problem is he's the only QB from this millennium that you can even try to draw a comparison from. I'll stand by what I said, Allen is not comparable to Stafford. I'll agree that this is the best positive comparison you can make to Allen but it isn't a particularly good one, and there are numerous negative comparisons you can point to. The historical data is pretty clear on this - QBs like Allen do not suddenly fix their ball placement in the NFL. All I'm saying is whichever QB we take in the 1st I will talk myself into...done it before There's too much value in that pick to be anything but optimistic about it imo. It's kind of a franchise-defining moment, as a fan you kind of have to get behind it is the way I see it. I just see a lot in Allen to get excited about, he's clearly not perfect.
HappyDays Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 Just now, JohnC said: The grass is greener on the other side of the fence especially when you don't have grass. As I said in another post don't let the seeking of perfection get in the way of seeking good. The ideal usually doesn't represent reality. No QB prospect is perfect but there are certain negative traits that history shows you can't fix. Ball placement is #1. QBs don't suddenly become more accurate especially when they're now going against NFL CBs. Darnold threw too many INTs for example but his problem was bad decisions, nor accuracy. You can make better decisions with more experience. For one reason or another accuracy never really improves a lot. And accuracy isn't Allen's only flaw. He's terrible against pressure and he makes too many poor decisions. 1 minute ago, GoBills808 said: All I'm saying is whichever QB we take in the 1st I will talk myself into...done it before There's too much value in that pick to be anything but optimistic about it imo. It's kind of a franchise-defining moment, as a fan you kind of have to get behind it is the way I see it. I just see a lot in Allen to get excited about, he's clearly not perfect. The Bills had the chance to draft Mahomes at #10 last year. No way they are now going to trade multiple 1st round picks for a very similar prospect. That would be incredibly dumb.
Recommended Posts