Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, GunnerBill said:

My judgment is the same as the day he was drafted.  He isn't an NFL level talent.  

 

But he might turn into a Hall of famer like those linked in the NFL.com article. :lol:

Posted

Peterman is not an Aikman or a Manning who were top QB prospects and selections.  Those guys were cut some slack because their coaches knew they had a lot more going for them.    What are we supposed to hope for from a 5th round pick?

Posted
2 minutes ago, prissythecat said:

Peterman is not an Aikman or a Manning who were top QB prospects and selections.  Those guys were cut some slack because their coaches knew they had a lot more going for them.    What are we supposed to hope for from a 5th round pick?

 

One round before Brady. Warner wasn't even drafted.

Posted
3 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

My judgment is the same as the day he was drafted.  He isn't an NFL level talent.  

Would you say arm strength is 100% of his issue?  To me it seemed the rest of his game looked pretty good but he just didn't get enough on the ball. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I ask it the other way around. Why do people believe in Peterman so much more than Levi Brown? They were both long shots with limited ability. 

cause this

 

BTW, Bills did 1-1 in Peterman starts. Just saying.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

Yeah, the only quarterbacks we like are the ones who haven't proved they are human - YET.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Sky Diver said:

 

One round before Brady. Warner wasn't even drafted.

 

 

Ah ok.  So Peterman is either the next Brady or Warner.   No need to worry about trading up for this year's draft then 

Posted
1 minute ago, 4merper4mer said:

Would you say arm strength is 100% of his issue?  To me it seemed the rest of his game looked pretty good but he just didn't get enough on the ball. 

 

No.  I don't think he is very accurate either.  I think he was the beneficiary of the "not a big arm but accurate" cliche. He played in a gimmicky offense that people presumed was pro-style because he took snaps under centre, his footwork is still inconsistent and his ball placement isn't great.  What he does do well is throw on time and that was the thing Dennison obviously liked about him.  Unfortunately it is often on time to the other team.  

Posted
Just now, GunnerBill said:

 

No.  I don't think he is very accurate either.  I think he was the beneficiary of the "not a big arm but accurate" cliche. He played in a gimmicky offense that people presumed was pro-style because he took snaps under centre, his footwork is still inconsistent and his ball placement isn't great.  What he does do well is throw on time and that was the thing Dennison obviously liked about him.  Unfortunately it is often on time to the other team.  

 

Add in that he is not poised when pressured.  He completely melts down and makes poor decisions. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I ask it the other way around. Why do people believe in Peterman so much more than Levi Brown? They were both long shots with limited ability. 

He is not starting material. Most people would make that judgment. But that doesn't mean that he can't be a functional backup. If that is what he becomes then it was a good/reasonable investment for the pick.

 

Peterman had a horrible starting debute that many people want to permanently scar him. And to this day people still chortle over it. I don't have great expectations on how his career will materialize. However, it is not inconceivable that he can have a Colt McCoy type of career as a backup up that stretches into a fairly lucrative career. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, Sky Diver said:

Plenty of QBs who have had illustrious careers have had horrible starts.

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000445192/article/troy-aikman-peyton-manning-among-qbs-with-bad-first-starts

 

He is a flawed 5th round QB that struggled mightily. And like I said when drafted his ceiling is a 15 year Clip board holder. 

 

It is perfect Competition for the other BU QB on the roster AJ McCarron. Starter comes in the draft

Edited by MAJBobby
Posted

good grief.... i actually like Peterman! 

But we are digging a 2014 article up with a HOF list to point out not to judge too quick?

Too much of a stretch and trying to hard. He is still very much a wild card - but comparing him to a HOF is just as unfair as judging him on his 1 game.

Posted
1 minute ago, JohnC said:

He is not starting material. Most people would make that judgment. But that doesn't mean that he can't be a functional backup. If that is what he becomes then it was a good/reasonable investment for the pick.

 

Peterman had a horrible starting debute that many people want to permanently scar him. And to this day people still chortle over it. I don't have great expectations on how his career will materialize. However, it is not inconceivable that he can have a Colt McCoy type of career as a backup up that stretches into a fairly lucrative career. 

That is exactly what I hoped (and thought) when they drafted him. I thought he could be a heady backup that could keep you afloat for a 4 game stretch. I don’t think that now but am not completely ruling it out either. I wasn’t as low on him as Gunner and Blokes and they watched WAY more of him than me. That is scary. The guys that have watched him the closest like him the least. 

 

He is going to have a tough time being on this roster IMO. If they trade up and have Rosen and McCarron (for example) and Dennison gone, why keep him? He may be a PS guy but it feels like a roster spot that would be better served on someone like Reilly.

  • Like (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...