Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Makes sense to me.  They like him as a guy who knows the scheme and plays special teams.  I thought he was up and down last year but they are very thin at the position.  I'd still like to see someone else brought in there.... Kevin Minter or Will Compton would do very nicely.  I also expect them to attack the position in the draft - possibly with two picks.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

Thank god.  While I wouldn’t consider him a good player, he had his moments last season.  Good Depth signing that knows the system at a great price.  Well done

Posted
25 minutes ago, atlbillsfan1975 said:

how does this impact the signing of either one of the other FA LB’s the Bills had in recently? Is Humbers position and skill set similar to either Minter or Compton?

They still need to replace Preston 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Humber is weak... a fifth round rookie took his spot and outshined him!!!

 

Nothing but depth and ST.

1 minute ago, YoloinOhio said:

They still need to replace Preston 

Vander Esch, Edwards orEvans

Posted
17 minutes ago, BuffaloRush said:

I get the impression he’ll start

On Teams.. I like him. and some situational ball. 

16 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

They still need to replace Preston 

and then some

Posted (edited)
38 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Makes sense as they are so thin at the position. Humber is at least a competent NFL LB.

 

That's my thought as well--if he can be the least of your starting 11, then you're probably in pretty good shape.

Edited by thebandit27
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Fine for a vet minimum deal. I get the impression that they don't love Matt Milano, which makes me question their sanity. Again, I trust the process, but Humber playing when Milano was clearly better, giving carres to Mike Tolbert, and rolling with Jordan Mills and Ducasse just seem like such poor decisions. I really was okay with every decision they made last year even the trades and the Tyrod benching. But playing those guys seems nuts. 

 

If Humber is back as a special teams only player fine, but if he sees significant time on defense, there is a problem.  

Posted
1 minute ago, BillsEnthusiast said:

Nothing wrong with a little more depth. 

 

This is true. It's only a problem if depth winds up starting at WILL and losing Ben Koyack on the goaline in the playoffs!

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

One of the beat writers for the Jets was on NFL Radio Saturday and said Stanford was a solid LB that was stuck primarily on special teams due to team “politics”.   He didn’t elaborate on what those politics were. He said that the Stanford signing was going to be a coup for the Bills.

Edited by Inigo Montoya
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Inigo Montoya said:

One of the beat writers for the Jets was on NFL Radio Saturday and said Stanford was a solid LB that was stuck primarily on special teams due to team “politics”.   He didn’t elaborate on what those politics were. He said that The Stanford signing was going to be a coup for the Bills.

Interesting 

×
×
  • Create New...