ALF Posted March 25, 2018 Posted March 25, 2018 One scenario is that the acquisition of Keenum, coupled with a likely early run on the top quarterbacks in the draft could leave the Broncos tempted to grab a blue-chip, non-quarterback prospect and wait until later in the draft to add a quarterback. https://www.denverpost.com/2018/03/20/broncos-quarterback-options-nfl-draft/
RocCityRoller Posted March 25, 2018 Posted March 25, 2018 (edited) On 3/19/2018 at 8:08 PM, Chuck Wagon said: Even if it's all 5 picks between 12 - 65, the reality is you are likely giving up 1 pro bowler, 1 borderline pro bowler / solid starter, 1 solid starter, 2 disappointments. The impact simply pales in comparison to getting a QB who is the face of the franchise for a decade or more. You and 26corner keep saying things like this, assuming Rosen is the face of the franchise for 10+ years. How do you know that? You don't. No one does. I'd rather take 1 pro bowler, 1 borderline pro bowler / solid starter, 1 solid starter, 2 disappointments than a try at a borderline franchise QB, especially in a QB deep draft. Do you want to hope you land Andrew Luck, and have a weak team, or draft a QB with a few questions and build the team? That is the question. How has 'can't miss Andrew Luck' done without a team? and it's not 'house money' this team traded away its starting QB, LT and #1WR (2 firsts) for these picks. The OP is like the guy gambling on his credit card because, 'Hey its free money if I win'. Edited March 25, 2018 by RocCityRoller 1
Zerovoltz Posted March 25, 2018 Posted March 25, 2018 3 hours ago, ALF said: One scenario is that the acquisition of Keenum, coupled with a likely early run on the top quarterbacks in the draft could leave the Broncos tempted to grab a blue-chip, non-quarterback prospect and wait until later in the draft to add a quarterback. https://www.denverpost.com/2018/03/20/broncos-quarterback-options-nfl-draft/ This should have been obvious to everyone the minute Keenum signed his contract....don't need the Denver Post to tell you this.... 1 hour ago, RocCityRoller said: You and 26corner keep saying things like this, assuming Rosen is the face of the franchise for 10+ years. How do you know that? You don't. No one does. I'd rather take 1 pro bowler, 1 borderline pro bowler / solid starter, 1 solid starter, 2 disappointments than a try at a borderline franchise QB, especially in a QB deep draft. Do you want to hope you land Andrew Luck, and have a weak team, or draft a QB with a few questions and build the team? That is the question. How has 'can't miss Andrew Luck' done without a team? and it's not 'house money' this team traded away its starting QB, LT and #1WR (2 firsts) for these picks. The OP is like the guy gambling on his credit card because, 'Hey its free money if I win'. Healthy Andrew Luck has done VERY WELL without a team around him..he makes them all better. That's what a franchise QB does.
RocCityRoller Posted March 25, 2018 Posted March 25, 2018 (edited) Funny, I seem to recall Indy has been to the playoffs 3 of 6 years since drafting Luck, making the AFC Championship once with 0 Super Bowl appearances in that span. Each year they had to play in the wild card round, so 0 first round byes, and it's not like they had the Pats, Steelers or Broncos in their division. In 5 years, not counting the year he was knocked out, he is a whopping 9 games over .500. That equates to 9-7or 10-6 depending on rounding (+1.8 games over 8-8) And Indy did not have to sell the farm to get him. They had the pick from tankng, and did not have to spend insane draft capital, or trade away NFL contributors to get the pick to do so. This is not 'house money' as another genius posted. You would think that a team picking the consensus best QB, with its natural draft pick, coming off of multiple playoff appearances in the 5 years before him, in a weak division would do better. But we at TBD should drink the Kool-aid to trade a 1 this year, give up an additional 1 this year and next, and possibly 2 seconds to get the second or third best QB in the draft. All of this despite having one of the oldest rosters in the NFL, and coming off of 1 playoff appearance in 18 years. All to select a guy that quit on a sport when he needed surgery, had a 17-13 record, is not a cultural fit at all, has already had multiple shoulder injuries and concussions, and the team will have less draft capital in the first two years to build around him. Yeah, I'm sure Buffalo betting the house on Rosen will do better than Indy with Luck. Edited March 25, 2018 by RocCityRoller 1 1
4merper4mer Posted March 25, 2018 Posted March 25, 2018 2 hours ago, RocCityRoller said: You and 26corner keep saying things like this, assuming Rosen is the face of the franchise for 10+ years. How do you know that? You don't. No one does. I'd rather take 1 pro bowler, 1 borderline pro bowler / solid starter, 1 solid starter, 2 disappointments than a try at a borderline franchise QB, especially in a QB deep draft. Do you want to hope you land Andrew Luck, and have a weak team, or draft a QB with a few questions and build the team? That is the question. How has 'can't miss Andrew Luck' done without a team? and it's not 'house money' this team traded away its starting QB, LT and #1WR (2 firsts) for these picks. The OP is like the guy gambling on his credit card because, 'Hey its free money if I win'. I agree with all of that but something else is even easier to figure out. if it is so hyper critical for the Bills to do "whatever it takes" to get a QB because that is what makes a franchise tick blah blah then why is it fine for the Giants to just pass one up? In some respects the guys screaming from the hilltops for a QB should be the ones to first realize that no amount of "draft capital" will get us to 2 if their very own logic is to be believed.
Zerovoltz Posted March 25, 2018 Posted March 25, 2018 13 minutes ago, RocCityRoller said: Funny, I seem to recall Indy has been to the playoffs 3 of 6 years since drafting Luck, making the AFC Championship once with 0 Super Bowl appearances in that span. Each year they had to play in the wild card round, so 0 first round byes, and it's not like they had the Pats, Steelers or Broncos in their division. In 5 years, not counting the year he was knocked out, he is a whopping 9 games over .500. That equates to 9-7or 10-6 depending on rounding (+1.8 games over 8-8) And Indy did not have to sell the farm to get him. They had the pick from tankng, and did not have to spend insane draft capital, or trade away NFL contributors to get the pick to do so. This is not 'house money' as another genius posted. You would think that a team picking the consensus best QB, with its natural draft pick, coming off of multiple playoff appearances in the 5 years before him, in a weak division would do better. But we at TBD should drink the Kool-aid to trade a 1 this year, give up an additional 1 this year and next, and possibly 2 seconds to get the second or third best QB in the draft. All of this despite having one of the oldest rosters in the NFL, and coming off of 1 playoff appearance in 18 years. All to select a guy that quit on a sport when he needed surgery, had a 17-13 record, is not a cultural fit at all, has already had multiple shoulder injuries and concussions, and the team will have less draft capital in the first two years to build around him. Yeah, I'm sure Buffalo betting the house on Rosen will do better than Indy with Luck. Umm... did you happen to notice those Colts “teams” made the playoffs with Peyton Manning, they lose him, and the “team” finished with the worst record in football. They draft Luck, and they are are a playoff team again. Luck gets hurt and they end up with the third pick in the draft. I am not very smart but I think this is what is referred to as a pattern.
4merper4mer Posted March 25, 2018 Posted March 25, 2018 8 minutes ago, Zerovotlz said: Umm... did you happen to notice those Colts “teams” made the playoffs with Peyton Manning, they lose him, and the “team” finished with the worst record in football. They draft Luck, and they are are a playoff team again. Luck gets hurt and they end up with the third pick in the draft. I am not very smart but I think this is what is referred to as a pattern. Kim Jung QB is above reproach.
mannc Posted March 25, 2018 Posted March 25, 2018 6 hours ago, Boatdrinks said: Yeah it's not happening. Sashi is gone. John Dorsey isn't dumb. Cleveland’s not trading out of 4, either. They don’t need or want more draft picks.
NewEraBills Posted March 25, 2018 Posted March 25, 2018 5 hours ago, ALF said: One scenario is that the acquisition of Keenum, coupled with a likely early run on the top quarterbacks in the draft could leave the Broncos tempted to grab a blue-chip, non-quarterback prospect and wait until later in the draft to add a quarterback. https://www.denverpost.com/2018/03/20/broncos-quarterback-options-nfl-draft/ I thought about this but I just don't see it given next year's class. The Donkey's could go with Keenum this year and the following year but then they probably will not be in this position to snag a "franchise" type guy. They could draft that guy this year and let him sit behind Keenum and be ready to take over when Keenum is done, which could be next year or the year after. This QB class is like a "last chance" until who knows when for a lot of teams.
Reed83HOF Posted March 25, 2018 Posted March 25, 2018 8 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said: Dorsey could almost justify the move if he truly likes a QB other than Darnold like Allen or Mayfield a lot considering he's still got the 4th pick and he'd pick up 2 more 1st rounders this year alone Hope...it's a fickle thing. It sure would be nice though..
transplantbillsfan Posted March 25, 2018 Author Posted March 25, 2018 (edited) 10 hours ago, ALF said: One scenario is that the acquisition of Keenum, coupled with a likely early run on the top quarterbacks in the draft could leave the Broncos tempted to grab a blue-chip, non-quarterback prospect and wait until later in the draft to add a quarterback. https://www.denverpost.com/2018/03/20/broncos-quarterback-options-nfl-draft/ God I hope so... this would bode well for the acquisition of Mayfield Edited March 25, 2018 by transplantbillsfan
Putin Posted March 25, 2018 Posted March 25, 2018 On 3/19/2018 at 7:01 PM, billsfan11 said: I think Bills will have to give up more than that to get to two. I think it’s going to cost them both 1st this years and next years as well. This ^^^^^
#34fan Posted March 25, 2018 Posted March 25, 2018 So, we bust our hump acquiring all these picks just so we can make the Giants a better team? If that's Beane's idea of manangement, he'll deserve the firing that awaits at the end of this misadventure.
VaMilBill Posted March 25, 2018 Posted March 25, 2018 On 3/19/2018 at 7:59 PM, Real McCoy said: If it's for their guy then go for it. I think we might trade up to 7-10 to get our guy though for a fraction. Problem is we don't know who "the guy" is? I agree. I think the Bills will sit at 12 and see where the draft falls. If one of the QBs we like is there at 7 I think we start gunning hard for that pick. TBH, I hope we don't cut any more deals with Indy after they screwed us. I know it's a business, but I want to see that franchise suffer now
transplantbillsfan Posted March 25, 2018 Author Posted March 25, 2018 4 hours ago, #34fan said: So, we bust our hump acquiring all these picks just so we can make the Giants a better team? If that's Beane's idea of manangement, he'll deserve the firing that awaits at the end of this misadventure. Do you seriously think that Beane busted his hump to acquire all those picks in order to pick a Center and an LB in the 1st round of this draft? If Beane and McDermott don't get one of the 2 or 3 QBs they feel strongly about, this draft will be a failure. 2
#34fan Posted March 25, 2018 Posted March 25, 2018 6 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: Do you seriously think that Beane busted his hump to acquire all those picks in order to pick a Center and an LB in the 1st round of this draft? If Beane and McDermott don't get one of the 2 or 3 QBs they feel strongly about, this draft will be a failure. For the record, I'd prefer it be DT, LB... I'd even accept DT, QB (Lamar Jackson @ 22) People are saying both firsts, a second, and next year's first are on the table, and that's just nuts... 2
transplantbillsfan Posted March 25, 2018 Author Posted March 25, 2018 3 minutes ago, #34fan said: For the record, I'd prefer it be DT, LB... I'd even accept DT, QB (Lamar Jackson @ 22) People are saying both firsts, a second, and next year's first are on the table, and that's just nuts... It's not nuts at all, actually. You just seem a little out of touch with reality. In order for the Eagles to move up from #8 to #2, it cost them their 1st, 3rd & 4th in 2016 PLUS their 1st in 2017 PLUS their 1st in 2018. And it doesn't appear as though they mortgaged their future either considering... ya know... Super Bowl 2 1
#34fan Posted March 25, 2018 Posted March 25, 2018 7 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: It's not nuts at all, actually. You just seem a little out of touch with reality. In order for the Eagles to move up from #8 to #2, it cost them their 1st, 3rd & 4th in 2016 PLUS their 1st in 2017 PLUS their 1st in 2018. And it doesn't appear as though they mortgaged their future either considering... ya know... Super Bowl It's Hilarious that you think any of the "top rated QB's in this Draft are like Carson Wentz... Shows how in touch "with reality" you are... Philly waited 17 years to take a QB in the 1st round. (McNabb was the last)... And in the end, It wasn't Wentz that won the Superbowl, it was 3rd round Journeyman Nick Foles. Never mind that there was a solid supporting cast in place when Wentz did get there. (OT, WR, TE), ... Then they loaded up at other support positions like RB (Blount, Ajayi) You think we're following their blueprint for success? 9 times out of 10 in 'monkey-see/ monkey do', the monkey gets it wrong.
Reed83HOF Posted March 25, 2018 Posted March 25, 2018 14 minutes ago, #34fan said: 9 times out of 10 in 'monkey-see/ monkey do', the monkey gets it wrong. I thought it got spanked...
Recommended Posts