26CornerBlitz Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 I'll be surprised if the Browns move out of #1. 7 1
Like A Mofo Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 No way Cleveland moves out of 1. Browns need players, they already have a great draft board. At some point you need to take high end players in a draft and stop accumulating so many picks. 2
Success Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 Due diligence. More and more I feel like we won’t be trading into the top 5. 4
YoloinOhio Posted March 19, 2018 Author Posted March 19, 2018 (edited) I do not think the Browns are moving. I do think the Bills are determining market for the #1 now that the cost for #3 is locked in, to re-set on their offer for the #2 pick. Its the same thing they did in FA with the QBs. Beane straight up said that they made calls about QBs as due diligence on market with no intent on signing them. Edited March 19, 2018 by YoloinOhio 4
vorpma Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 On 3/19/2018 at 2:18 PM, Commonsense said: Fire Beane he is QB drunk. Expand Fire everybody and start over!!! The quality of this board is dropping fast! 2 2
Seasons1992 Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 It's all part of the game right now. It's fun for us message board weirdo's and nothing else. Considering the short tenure/small body of work Bean has, I'm trusting his judgement more and more every day. Make the call and get some of the other teams paranoid. Why not?
Mr. WEO Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 On 3/19/2018 at 2:19 PM, kdiggz said: Have to call and ask. Doesn't mean anything. Expand True. After all it's the Browns. Any sort of numbskull move is possible. 1
BrooklynBills Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 Could be a way to get Giants moving. It really behooves the Browns for us or another QB needy team to get into the top 3 so that they can take a QB at 1 and then take the best position player at 4. 1
auburnbillsbacker Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 The old Browns GM would have traded the pick but they will stay at 1 and select a QB. I'm glad the Bills have explored the possibility of trading for the pick though. 1
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 (edited) This makes it worse if they can't trade up. Go get him, whatever it takes. Edited March 19, 2018 by TheTruthHurts
xRUSHx Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 On 3/19/2018 at 2:19 PM, kdiggz said: Have to call and ask. Doesn't mean anything. Expand I agree, this just adds to the talk about Bills wanting to move up, pillow talk. They said they were calling teams about everyone and everything just to have knowledge on it. I would be very surprised if they moved up to 1 but would be extremely happy if they did considering we never are aggessive to get a top QB. It would be a dam miracle IMO.
Chuck Wagon Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 (edited) On 3/19/2018 at 2:19 PM, YoloinOhio said: I do not think the Browns are moving. I do think the Bills are determining market for the #1 now that the cost for #3 is locked in, to re-set on their offer for the #2 pick. Its the same thing they did in FA with the QBs. Beane straight up said that they made calls about QBs as due diligence on market with no intent on signing them. Expand It makes sense. If the Browns actually are open to business and want less than the Giants, it makes no sense to trade with the Giants. I highly doubt the Browns and Giants are collaborating on prices of 1 vs 2. I wish Sachi were running their draft, then all we'd have to give is #12 / 2019 1st / 5th round pick and Sachi would happily take Mason Rudolph at #12. Edited March 19, 2018 by Chuck Wagon
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 On 3/19/2018 at 2:26 PM, xRUSHx said: I agree, this just adds to the talk about Bills wanting to move up, pillow talk. They said they were calling teams about everyone and everything just to have knowledge on it. I would be very surprised if they moved up to 1 but would be extremely happy if they did considering we never are aggessive to get a top QB. It would be a dam miracle IMO. Expand We have the assets. Get it done. They dumped cap, and we can fill holes in free agency next year. 1
BrooklynBills Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 Also, if Browns have all 4 QBs rated equally and they can get an RG3 type haul for 1, maybe it makes sense. 2 1st round picks for the next 3 years could appeal to Dorsey to start his GM tenure and he still gets 1 of the QBs at 4. This assumes that they have 4 QBs rated equally.
billspro Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 I think at the very least the Browns would let us know what QB they would select if they stay there. If they are not picking our guy, Beane will trade up to number 2 and the Browns will get Barkley at 4. It is in the Browns best interest to have us trade up to number 2. 2
Recommended Posts