Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 3:29 PM, Pete said:

We stockpile 6 picks out of top 96 and want to trade almost all of them for 56% odds?

Expand  

On top of that this draft has a deep talent pool that will probably push into the 4th rd. I see our picks being more valuable this year because of the talent of players in it.

Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 3:51 PM, Call_Of_Ktulu said:

On top of that this draft has a deep talent pool that will probably push into the 4th rd. I see our picks being more valuable this year because of the talent of players in it.

Expand  

and If you then get stuck with a S()*^ QB, none of that talent matters.

 

Im not sure how people are confused by this, or so against it. The Bills have tried every which way possible but the QB for the last 15 Years.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 3:55 PM, CountDorkula said:

and If you then get stuck with a S()*^ QB, none of that talent matters.

 

Im not sure how people are confused by this, or so against it. The Bills have tried every which way possible but the QB for the last 15 Years.

Expand  

 

Because, Buffalo mentality

 

Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 3:17 PM, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

Stafford is a great example... costly to keep but never quite over the hump

 

 

Fine if we insist on recycling  this elementary school stat line: 

 

starting championship QBs- 

 

Picks 1-5 since 1990- 6%

picks 6-32- 11.1%

 

I prefer Super Bowl wins over appearances and probowls thanks. 

Expand  

It seems to be resonating more than your rebuttal....

Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 3:55 PM, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

Apologies, I thought you were taking a side and making an argument based on the assertion of the thread. 

 

Yes, football is a team sport. Good point. 

 

Expand  

Find me the 25 highest paid players in this "team" sport, 23 of them play the QB position.

 

IS it, 23 teams have figured this out and the Bills are trying to get into the exclusive club, or the Bills are smarter than the rest of the league?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 2:12 PM, CountDorkula said:

What about

 

Andrew luck

Carson Wentz

Jared Goff

Matt Ryan

Mahomes

Watson

Trubisky

Winston

Mariota

Newton

Stafford

 

Or do those guys not count since they don't fit your narrative? 

Expand  

Let's take a deep dive here on the list.  

Luck - pretty good but honestly he hasn't performed near what everyone thought he would.  

Wentz - agree.  He's the real deal. 

Goff - could be foles 2.0.  Was absolutely terrible in one system and good when given the most weapons in the league.  Can't say he's good yet.  

Matt Ryan - agree. 

Mahomes - crazy talk to say he's anything yet. 

Watson - looked good.  But is he another Bradford that can't stay healthy.  Who knows. 

Trubisky - wow.  Not sure he was better than treat Edwards last year to be honest. 

Winston - I wouldn't trade any pick yo get him.  He's horribly inconsistent. 

Mariota - under achieve much?  again.  No picks would be traded for him.  

Newton - agree...but he's not tier 1

Stafford - throws for 5k every year but can't win a playoff game.  

 

Of your list of trade picks in hindsight for 3.  Maybe 4 of them.   

Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 4:02 PM, Hebert19 said:

Let's take a deep dive here on the list.  

Luck - pretty good but honestly he hasn't performed near what everyone thought he would.  

Wentz - agree.  He's the real deal. 

Goff - could be foles 2.0.  Was absolutely terrible in one system and good when given the most weapons in the league.  Can't say he's good yet.  

Matt Ryan - agree. 

Mahomes - crazy talk to say he's anything yet. 

Watson - looked good.  But is he another Bradford that can't stay healthy.  Who knows. 

Trubisky - wow.  Not sure he was better than treat Edwards last year to be honest. 

Winston - I wouldn't trade any pick yo get him.  He's horribly inconsistent. 

Mariota - under achieve much?  again.  No picks would be traded for him.  

Newton - agree...but he's not tier 1

Stafford - throws for 5k every year but can't win a playoff game.  

 

Of your list of trade picks in hindsight for 3.  Maybe 4 of them.   

Expand  

See above post, 23 highest paid players are QBs.

Soon to be 25 of 25 after Goff and Wentz.

 

Bills outsmarting everyone by not playing a QB or just really late to the party. 

Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 3:58 PM, CountDorkula said:

Find me the 25 highest paid players in this "team" sport, 23 of them play the QB position.

 

IS it, 23 teams have figured this out and the Bills are trying to get into the exclusive club, or the Bills are smarter than the rest of the league?

Expand  

 

I’d say of those 23, some are probably wise to do so because they QBs they have are worth it, raise the level of team play and put butts in seats and some are overpaying for mediocrity just to still put butts in seats. 

 

I think there is a clear tranche of QBs that out earn their performance. 

 

My point is and has always been QB is important but you can’t overpay or overdraft for a guy that is marginally better than what you can find more cost effectively 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 4:04 PM, CountDorkula said:

See above post, 23 highest paid players are QBs.

Soon to be 25 of 25 after Goff and Wentz.

 

Bills outsmarting everyone by not playing a QB or just really late to the party. 

Expand  

Never said bills strategy was correct just disputing that most of those bozos would be worth paying the ransom we will have to pay to get someone like them. 

Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 4:04 PM, CountDorkula said:

See above post, 23 highest paid players are QBs.

Soon to be 25 of 25 after Goff and Wentz.

 

Bills outsmarting everyone by not playing a QB or just really late to the party. 

Expand  

Who cares how much they get paid?  So a lot of QBs are grossly overpaid because of their corresponding performance.  Do you not understand it makes the exact opposite argument from what you think?

Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 4:05 PM, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

I’d say of those 23, some are probably wise to do so because they QBs they have are worth it, raise the level of team play and put butts in seats and some are overpaying for mediocrity just to still put butts in seats. 

 

I think there is a clear tranche of QBs that out earn their performance. 

 

My point is and has always been QB is important but you can’t overpay or overdraft for a guy that is marginally better than what you can find more cost effectively 

Expand  

Taylor was cost effective, how did that work out?

Kyle Orton, Cost effective,

Kevin Kolb, cost Effective,

Ryan Fitzpatrick, cost effective.

 

 

  On 3/19/2018 at 4:07 PM, oldmanfan said:

Who cares how much they get paid?  So a lot of QBs are grossly overpaid because of their corresponding performance.  Do you not understand it makes the exact opposite argument from what you think?

Expand  

No it makes my argument, every other team is trying to build around QB, but fans here are trying to built 1980s lineman football.

 

Also, who are the grossly overpaid? Weren't you all about Kirk Cousins?

Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 4:08 PM, CountDorkula said:

Taylor was cost effective, how did that work out?

Kyle Orton, Cost effective,

Kevin Kolb, cost Effective,

Ryan Fitzpatrick, cost effective.

 

 

Expand  

Taylor has a better record the last three years than Stafford or Rivers. But that’s not my point. 

 

Flacco was cost effective 

wilson was cost effective 

ben was cost effective 

rodgers was cost effective 

 

When you get into a bidding war & hope to throw picks or money at QB to fix it- it’s not the silver bullet folks make it out to be. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 2:07 PM, Blokestradamus said:

 

I vote to oust McDermott and appoint Homer Simpson as coach.

 

End of season meeting - "Well, you tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is; never try."

Expand  

It's worth thinking about.  He (and Lisa) made a ton of money gambling on football, so he knows the sport.  Also, I believe he had a short stint as owner of the Broncos (from Hank Scorpio), so he has that background as well.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 4:08 PM, CountDorkula said:

Taylor was cost effective, how did that work out?

Kyle Orton, Cost effective,

Kevin Kolb, cost Effective,

Ryan Fitzpatrick, cost effective.

 

 

No it makes my argument, every other team is trying to build around QB, but fans here are trying to built 1980s lineman football.

 

Also, who are the grossly overpaid? Weren't you all about Kirk Cousins?

Expand  

Until  saw he was going to get grossly overpaid.

Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 4:08 PM, CountDorkula said:

Taylor was cost effective, how did that work out?

Kyle Orton, Cost effective,

Kevin Kolb, cost Effective,

Ryan Fitzpatrick, cost effective.

 

 

No it makes my argument, every other team is trying to build around QB, but fans here are trying to built 1980s lineman football.

 

Also, who are the grossly overpaid? Weren't you all about Kirk Cousins?

Expand  

Here's another grossly overpaid guy.  Bradford with the cards.  20 million for a guy who is always hurt.

 

Teams don't pay so much because they want to build around a QB.  They pay out of desperation. 

Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 4:23 PM, oldmanfan said:

Here's another grossly overpaid guy.  Bradford with the cards.  20 million for a guy who is always hurt.

 

Teams don't pay so much because they want to build around a QB.  They pay out of desperation. 

Expand  

This makes zero sense, team A desperately tries to find a QB and possibly overpays for one because they may not want to build around him?

×
×
  • Create New...