Jump to content

Should Beane be Fired Because of Today's Colts/Jets Trade?  

235 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Beane be Fired Because of Today's Colts/Jets Trade?

    • Yes
      17
    • No
      217


Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, Buffalo Bills Detective said:

6% of voters say "Yes"??????

Apparently your vote is carrying it's weight.

1 minute ago, T-Bomb said:

I think McBeane are gone in 2 years because of this Jets trade.  Instead of being here for 15 years.

 

Just a hunch...

Any reason why or just because?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Buffalo Bills Detective said:

Not proud at all.  It just shows how fickle this fanbase can be at times.  Last week, when they got a 1st for Cordy, Beane's a genius.  Today, when the Jets get the 3rd pick, he's "asleep at the wheel."

so kick him to the curb.....geez....maybe just maybe this team has already starting to improve from last season??

Posted

Bills Detective was trolling/poking fun at some of the wild over reactions and extreme and absurd hot takes we have seen over the past couple hours.  What's funnier is that there are 6 nincompoops who agreed with his troll job.

Posted
2 minutes ago, T-Bomb said:

I think McBeane are gone in 2 years because of this Jets trade.  Instead of being here for 15 years.

 

Just a hunch...

Both of those scenarios are unlikely 

Posted
1 minute ago, The Wiz said:

Apparently your vote is carrying it's weight.

Any reason why or just because?

 

For any coach/GM team to last in this league, they need a franchise QB pretty quickly after they arrive.  It's not McCarron...

Posted

This post has it all:

 

- HOT TAEKS

- Polls so unscientific they can best be described as “potato”

- Inapporiate use of the keyword function

- LAMP repetitiveness

 

Masterfully done, OP, really great work. 

 

giphy.gif

 

 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Buffalo Bills Detective said:

Sounds like T-Bomb voted "yes"!

 

I did yes, but that was because there was only 1 yes vote at the time and I wanted to keep enjoying this thread.

 

I don't think any coach/GM should get less than 3 years min.

 

However, this trade really hurts the current FO's prospects of longevity.

Edited by T-Bomb
Posted

I vote for newer posters not being able to start threads.

 

I don't mind the trade as much as I mind that the Jets gave up way too much to move up three spots.   If Buffalo does decide to trade up, it will likely cost them a lot more to do it now.

Posted
1 minute ago, dgrochester55 said:

I vote for newer posters not being able to start threads.

 

I don't mind the trade as much as I mind that the Jets gave up way too much to move up three spots.   If Buffalo does decide to trade up, it will likely cost them a lot more to do it now.

 

One way to hurt a division rival I suppose...

Posted

Um, no.  IMHO, a non-sensical question.  You're not gonna be able to make every deal, and it takes a willing dance partner.  McBeane have done a phenomenal job so far, and I'm sure they have something up their sleeve.  Maybe the Colts saw the Bills moves and decided to help the much more woeful Jets.  I think that's part of ti, which will make the deals going forward tougher for McBeane to make.

Posted
1 minute ago, Freddie's Dead said:

Maybe the Colts saw the Bills moves and decided to help the much more woeful Jets.

 

lol, now that is just silly...

 

Posted
1 minute ago, FeelingOnYouboty said:

Some people shouldn’t be allowed to create threads 

 

And some ppl take the internet waaaaaaay too seriously.

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...