Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hard to say for sure but it looks like the Jets want a QB, and they will be happy with any in their top 3 ranking.  

 

Bills would be be best to wait until draft day and see how it plays out.  

 

The Cleveland pick at 4 could be in play if the guy they like is still there.  

Posted

To hell with it ... Trade the whole damn draft to get to #1 and draft the turnover king Darnold at #1 .... hell yeah.

 

I'm glad McBeane is the GM and not the people on this board.

Posted

For those of us who prefer the method Pitts used of first build your TEAM then draft a QB like Big Ben as your franchise QB, this Jets move is great!

 

It heightens the chances a great position player falls to us at # 12 and we then continue to build our TEAM with our other 1st rounder, 2 nds, and 2 3rds.

 

We could use another QB to supplement McCarron, Peterman, but I like the idea of getting Jackson as late as we thinlk we can!

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Bakin said:

1 - Browns: Darnold

2 - Giants: Rosen

3 - Jets: Mayfield

 

Discuss....

 

I agree 100% that’s how it will go.

 

We lost big time today. No other way to say it.

Posted
1 hour ago, Bob in STL said:

Hard to say for sure but it looks like the Jets want a QB, and they will be happy with any in their top 3 ranking.  

 

Bills would be be best to wait until draft day and see how it plays out.  

 

The Cleveland pick at 4 could be in play if the guy they like is still there.  

Meh...the browns would just trade back 1 spot with Denver so they could still get a blue chip prospect...I think we are out of luck with getting a top 3 QB...so bring on the QB purgatory for another year!!!!! :sick:

Posted
5 minutes ago, PIZ said:

Any chance that the Broncos trade up to get Mayfield or Allen?

 

IMO, they won't have to - he'll be out there @ #5

Posted
58 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

 

Because that's EXACTLY what we need. A linebacker or DT.

 

So Billsy.

 

so who do you have pegged in for starting MLB?  And are you going to roll with Alexander as your SAM?

 

Roquan or Tremaine Edmunds would transform our defense into top notch.  And then you still have 5 more picks in first 3 rounds to devote to offense. 

 

It cost the Jets 3 #2s to move up from 6 to 3.  What outrageous price would we pay to move up 12 to 2?  No thank you.  There are 22 players that start, not just a QB.  It seems silly to me to ignore 5 positions upgrades and instead concentrate on one

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Pete said:

so who do you have pegged in for starting MLB?  And are you going to roll with Alexander as your SAM?

 

Roquan or Tremaine Edmunds would transform our defense into top notch.  And then you still have 5 more picks in first 3 rounds to devote to offense. 

 

It cost the Jets 3 #2s to move up from 6 to 3.  What outrageous price would we pay to move up 12 to 2?  No thank you.  There are 22 players that start, not just a QB.  It seems silly to me to ignore 5 positions upgrades and instead concentrate on one

 

The one position that is more important than any other on the field?

 

Yeah, it's kinda silly to concentrate on that one.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, KingRex said:

For those of us who prefer the method Pitts used of first build your TEAM then draft a QB like Big Ben as your franchise QB, this Jets move is great!

 

It heightens the chances a great position player falls to us at # 12 and we then continue to build our TEAM with our other 1st rounder, 2 nds, and 2 3rds.

 

We could use another QB to supplement McCarron, Peterman, but I like the idea of getting Jackson as late as we thinlk we can!

 

 

The Steelers took big Ben with the 11th overall pick. Good teams don't exactly draft 11th overall very often. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Bob in STL said:

Hard to say for sure but it looks like the Jets want a QB, and they will be happy with any in their top 3 ranking.  

 

Bills would be be best to wait until draft day and see how it plays out.  

 

The Cleveland pick at 4 could be in play if the guy they like is still there.  

That's risky. You could have the Broncos move up to 2 to ensure that the top three quarterbacks go. I think he's got to make a play before the draft or just stand down and admit he got boxed out of the top quarterbacks.

Posted
1 hour ago, McBean said:

 

I agree 100% that’s how it will go.

 

We lost big time today. No other way to say it.

 

We sure did lose out on #3.  But I don’t think NYG is going QB at #2

Posted
3 hours ago, DJB said:

Im loving a new thread every 5 minutes to discuss the exact same thing over and over again.

It is pretty funny. Everyone is freaking out over all the different possibilities. Let the talks pan out and maybe the G men don't ask for an arm and a leg.

×
×
  • Create New...