jrober38 Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 Just now, McBean said: It’s the Browns and they are stupid so you might be right. Still, that changes nothing. 1. Barkley 2. Rosen 3. Darnold 4. Allen 5. Mayfield I don't think the Giants or Broncos are convinced they need a QB. The Giants have holes all over the field and could try to rebuild around Eli for a year or two (not saying I'd do this but money, aka draft picks, talk). The Broncos have an aging team and are in win now mode. They just gave Case Keenum $26 mil guaranteed and could easily role with him for the next two years. Giving them a ton of picks would allow them to upgrade at RB and on the offensive line. I think both teams would trade down if given a reason to. I think the Broncos are the more likely of the two given how good their defense is they could be looking at a very quick turnaround with above average QB play.
OldTimer1960 Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 1 hour ago, Wayne Cubed said: It is a mistake for the Jets. Even if the Giants stay put, what if they draft a QB? That men’s the Jets traded up for the 3rd best QB in the draft. They were forced to make this move. You make this move on draft day, when you know the guy you want is there. This is a trade up and you can’t even target anyone. Of course they’ll say player X was their choice all along. If that happens then the Jets will have traded for the third selected QB in the draft. It does not necessarily mean that QB is the 3rd best.
MAJBobby Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 Well everyine is going to see what the second tier QBs are about in Buffalo. Like many wanted because unless you get to two you are shut out of the top 4
Thurman#1 Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 6 minutes ago, jrober38 said: Browns are going to take Barkley #1 and Allen #4. I guarantee it. That carries about as much weight as my barber guaranteeing me a shot at Kate Upton. 1
bobobonators Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 3 minutes ago, joesixpack said: Which again is why we should have tanked. Dont worry youll get to see what a real tank job looks like with AJ and Peterman tossing the ball around this year.
SmokinES3 Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 3 minutes ago, Real McCoy said: Yeah the Jets are stupid. LOL I mean, Todd Bowles is still their HC last I checked.
Wayne Cubed Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 1 minute ago, OldTimer1960 said: If that happens then the Jets will have traded for the third selected QB in the draft. It does not necessarily mean that QB is the 3rd best. True. But it's entirely possible they will be selecting their 3rd ranked QB on their board. We will never be privy to that because of course they'll say it's who they were targeting all along. Would you trade up to a spot, unsure of which QB you might be getting?
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 (edited) 1 minute ago, bobobonators said: Dont worry youll get to see what a real tank job looks like with AJ and Peterman tossing the ball around this year. And unfortunately next years qb class is pure **** Edited March 17, 2018 by joesixpack
Wayne Cubed Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 8 minutes ago, bobobonators said: You do realize that just bc our guy is there at #2 doesnt mean that the Giants are going to trade with us right? People seem to think Beane controls his owm destiny - he doesnt. As of right now, the Jets are 100% in a better position than us to get their guy. Get their guy? They have no idea if they can get their guy. They will either get the 2nd or 3rd QB in the draft, that may or may not be "their guy."
jrober38 Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 Just now, Thurman#1 said: That carries about as much weight as my barber guaranteeing me a shot at Kate Upton. Naw, there's no shot that happens. What I'm saying is what's going to happen. Everything they've done so far makes sense. Tyrod is the steady hand at QB, with Josh Gordon stretching the field (what Tyrod does best) and Landry working the slot. Njoku can stretch the seem at the TE spot. Barkley gives their run game instant credibility. Allen is the guy they love (has been reported on and off for a while now), and having Tyrod allows them to red shirt him for a year and then insert him into a supremely talented offense in 2019. Wait and see.
Real McClappy Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, SmokinES3 said: I mean, Todd Bowles is still their HC last I checked. Spot on here with Bowles. At least they will have 2 QB's to bridge with and possible FQB for the future. Bridgewater seems like a waste now. McCown paired with Rosen, Baker or Darnold would have been perfect alone. Either way, they will have this along with Bridgewater. They have exactly what I wanted us to have I not sure how that is a mistake though to this thread? Edited March 17, 2018 by Real McCoy
BadLandsMeanie Posted March 17, 2018 Author Posted March 17, 2018 11 minutes ago, Real McCoy said: Spot on here with Bowles. At least they will have 2 QB's to bridge with and possible FQB for the future. Bridgewater seems like a waste now. McCown paired with Rosen, Baker or Darnold would have been perfect alone. Either way, they will have this along with Bridgewater. They have exactly what I wanted us to have I not sure how that is a mistake though to this thread? Well I don't want to keep repeating myself but I will say, maybe for the Jets, it really doesn't matter to them who they get. Maybe they have no strong preference. But in the case that they do have a preference, then they just opened a narrow gap for the Bills to trade over them and get the player they want most.
Reed83HOF Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 Joe BannerVerified account @JoeBanner13 1m1 minute ago Jets pass on Watson and Mahommes to take excellent safety then spent 15M on TWO back up QB’s then use a 1 and 3 twos to get second/third best QB in draft. It could work out, but this is a lot of bad decision making and inefficient use of cap $’s and draft picks. 1 1
BadLandsMeanie Posted March 17, 2018 Author Posted March 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said: Joe BannerVerified account @JoeBanner13 1m1 minute ago Jets pass on Watson and Mahommes to take excellent safety then spent 15M on TWO back up QB’s then use a 1 and 3 twos to get second/third best QB in draft. It could work out, but this is a lot of bad decision making and inefficient use of cap $’s and draft picks. Woot woot! Who is this Joe Banner who seems so wise? He is quoted by Andre Reed?
bobobonators Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 25 minutes ago, Wayne Cubed said: Get their guy? They have no idea if they can get their guy. They will either get the 2nd or 3rd QB in the draft, that may or may not be "their guy." And what idea do we have at 12?
Elite Poster Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 58 minutes ago, Mat68 said: They didnt have gusto to do it now what would change on draft night? Buffalo knows what it would take and that is why they made that trade with the Bengals. Beane is too calculated to trade to 3 this far out from the draft. The top organizations are not going to grade the top 5 Qbs similar. They are not all going to be great pros. The NFL has 13 good QBs. This draft isnt going to produce 5. Figure out which one you like best and get him if you think he is a Franchise Qb. Maybe 3 was the only option I dont think that is case. Gettleman wants a kings ransom that Buffalo can pay. 1 is the qb they want going to be their? 2 Is that Qb worth the price tag. Without knowing 1 or 2 I dont understand why you trade that far up. The NFL has 13 good QBs, ok. Eli Manning, Philip Rivers, Big Ben, all came from one draft. That's nearly 25% of your 13. Unfortunately, we were left with leftover Losman. History repeats itself.
Recommended Posts