Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Somebody has some splainin to do....that thing was just opened a week or two ago. The construction firm will blame the engineering firm and vice versa.

Edited by RaoulDuke79
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

:huh:

 

"We built it in five days, it won't be finished for about a year.  But let's start using it."

 

Seriously?  

i don't believe it was opened yet, thought the article stated was not open to pedestrian traffic yet.

 

yep, here it is

 

There were as yet no stairs or ramps to the bridge, which was not open. Opening was scheduled for early next year.

Edited by plenzmd1
Posted

Am I seeing this right, the bridge crosses over 6 lanes of traffic plus a median, but has no middle support and no suspension?  I have absolutely zero engineering knowledge, but that doesn't sound like the best of plans to me (yeah, hindsight, I know).

Posted
Just now, shrader said:

Am I seeing this right, the bridge crosses over 6 lanes of traffic plus a median, but has no middle support and no suspension?  I have absolutely zero engineering knowledge, but that doesn't sound like the best of plans to me (yeah, hindsight, I know).

It would have been fine except for that one fat chick.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, shrader said:

Am I seeing this right, the bridge crosses over 6 lanes of traffic plus a median, but has no middle support and no suspension?  I have absolutely zero engineering knowledge, but that doesn't sound like the best of plans to me (yeah, hindsight, I know).

 

But it only weighed 950 tons.

 

Who are our resident structural engineers?

Posted
18 minutes ago, shrader said:

Am I seeing this right, the bridge crosses over 6 lanes of traffic plus a median, but has no middle support and no suspension?  I have absolutely zero engineering knowledge, but that doesn't sound like the best of plans to me (yeah, hindsight, I know).

You're not seeing it right.  It utilized a truss type construction.

 

Look at photos before the collapse; you'll notice huge diagonal members connecting the floor of the bridge to the roof of the bridge; those were there to provide the vertical load strength you are asserting the bridge didn't have.

 

 

Posted
37 minutes ago, shrader said:

Am I seeing this right, the bridge crosses over 6 lanes of traffic plus a median, but has no middle support and no suspension?  I have absolutely zero engineering knowledge, but that doesn't sound like the best of plans to me (yeah, hindsight, I know).

 

I don’t think that’s how the Romans would have done it. 

 

What a tragedy! 

Posted

Years ago they built the I-94 bridge, over the Calumet River here, down river and floated the new span into place... It's still holding after a couple decades 

 

I hope I didn't just jinx it with this "instant bridge talk."

33 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

I don’t think that’s how the Romans would have done it. 

 

What a tragedy! 

What is FIU noted for?  Doctors and lawyers?  I don't think engineering.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, KD in CA said:

 

But it only weighed 950 tons.

 

Who are our resident structural engineers?

I got this

 

 

Jet fuel can't melt steel beams.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anyway, this is sad. Happened at MIS back a decade ago after a race.  Only half a dozen killed that time. This sucks. 

Edited by Boyst62
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Helpmenow said:

Where was the testing and who inspected it. Pee wee herman

Probably an army of our crack government inspectors and regulators went over it with extreme diligence. 

Edited by Dante
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Dante said:

Probably an army of our crack government inspectors and regulators went over it with extreme diligence. 

Scary thought

Posted

I heard that maybe they were doing a stress test on it when it came down, but that wouldn't make sense to have done that with the road open.

 

×
×
  • Create New...