gobills1212 Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said: It is I'm afraid. whats worse is I'd imagine most just witnessed a 17 year drought. I mean... good grief!!!
Doc Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 16 minutes ago, gobills1212 said: but that goes in the face of the people complaining about filling holes while not acknowledging next years cap space. I mean, sure- you wanna throw em a 2nd next yr or the Browns 3rd for Foles? fine. I cant really argue a ton with that BUT you are still giving away something that seems to be pretty valuable towards a position you are already spending a lot on and would be just as well off with some old scrub to mentor if they decide to start him week 1/2/3 etc I'm saying that trading for Foles doesn't preclude a trade up. But I doubt they'd bother trading up. 18 minutes ago, gobills1212 said: are you REALLY asking me that question? Yes I am. Do you think that Sal knows what the Bills' real plans are? Because I don't.
Doc Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 17 minutes ago, ScottLaw said: Counting on Foles as your franchise QB is as Billsy as it gets. Need to trade up and get a QB even if they get Foles. Sure Scott. Because you've been so right about them this past year. 17 minutes ago, gobills1212 said: **not that they would***??? i sure as **** hope they would! If ANYTHING has been learned in the last 18 yrs hopefully its dont trade for Foles and make him 'the guy' ESP when they can get a blue chipper It's not often you can get a guy who won a SB for (presumably) a 2nd rounder and $7M for the season. Versus giving up the 12th, 22nd, and 65th pick (at least) to move up to 3rd overall and take a wholly unproven rookie. 9 minutes ago, gobills1212 said: whats worse is I'd imagine most just witnessed a 17 year drought. I mean... good grief!!! You realize the irony of this statement? You think a rookie is taking the Bills to the playoffs this year? 2 minutes ago, TPS said: Shoot the messenger! Why? He said after 4 PM.
Augie Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 1 hour ago, BuffaloBaumer said: This would be THE, I mean THE worst possible scenario in this history of the franchise. Are you new? 22 minutes ago, Sweats said: If the DMV guy said it, then by god it must be true!!!! Well, now it’s on the internet, so there is your verification! 1
Mojo44 Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 1 minute ago, Doc said: Sure Scott. Because you've been so right about them this past year. It's not often you can get a guy who won a SB for (presumably) a 2nd rounder and $7M for the season. Versus giving up the 12th, 22nd, and 65th pick (at least) to move up to 3rd overall and take a wholly unproven rookie. You realize the irony of this statement? You think a rookie is taking the Bills to the playoffs this year? If the bills believed that they got their franchise guy through a trade or through free agency I could absolutely see them trading up to number 12 to take a maximum impact player such as Smith. That thought is not irrational whatsoever. However, like most of you, I think the OP is BS. And I don’t necessarily see Foles as that guy. But then again, he could be.Evaluating quarterbacks he is one weird science!
Doc Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 Just now, ScottLaw said: Your saying the Bills should commit to a guy who's been a backup for the majority of his career and got on a little hot streak to close out the season? Foles is who he is. A decent backup. I'd be all for him as a bridge, but they still need to draft a QB. I've said this a million times, but he got on a hot streak because they put him in an offense best suited for him. And he didn't do it like the other JAG QB's who won a SB, i.e. thanks to being a caretaker. You trade a 2nd rounder, let him play most of the season under his old contract, and then decide whether to extend him, franchise him, or let him go. 2 minutes ago, Mojo44 said: If the bills believed that they got their franchise guy through a trade or through free agency I could absolutely see them trading up to number 12 to take a maximum impact player such as Smith. That thought is not irrational whatsoever. However, like most of you, I think the OP is BS. And I don’t necessarily see Foles as that guy. But then again, he could be.Evaluating quarterbacks he is one weird science! Yup. I don't see them trading up to 12 as a sign that they are without question looking to move up even further for a QB. It gives them a chance at a better non-QB player. As for the OP, we'll have to wait and see.
TPS Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 8 minutes ago, Doc said: Sure Scott. Because you've been so right about them this past year. It's not often you can get a guy who won a SB for (presumably) a 2nd rounder and $7M for the season. Versus giving up the 12th, 22nd, and 65th pick (at least) to move up to 3rd overall and take a wholly unproven rookie. You realize the irony of this statement? You think a rookie is taking the Bills to the playoffs this year? Why? He said after 4 PM. The title implies 4pm. Besides, it was meant in jest Doc.
Doc Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 1 minute ago, TPS said: The title implies 4pm. Besides, it was meant in jest Doc. I got the joke, but to be fair, his post said after 4 PM. I haven't known Tipster to be a troll. 1
PromoTheRobot Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 14 minutes ago, Doc said: Why? He said after 4 PM. Maybe it's 4pm Pacific?
Saxum Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 1 hour ago, BuffaloBaumer said: This would be THE, I mean THE worst possible scenario in this history of the franchise. The could hire you like the Lions did when they signed a broadcaster as GM .... That would be worse.
JoeF Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 10 minutes ago, Augie said: Are you new? Bills might lead the world in "Hold my beer, I can show you "stupidity at a level never seen before in the NFL" franchise moments. So we got this Division 3 baseball player who we're going to put in charge of football decisions..We going to hire a fat, undisciplined carnival barker as our coach....
Saxum Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 1 hour ago, Canadian Bills Fan said: This would be the Billiest thing Buffalo could do. Make all these awesome trades and signings, move up in the draft only to trade for a back up QB coming off his only good year and totally not even draft a QB He has two good years - maybe it would be the Loonie thing to do.
K D Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 What is this world coming to where you can't even trust the random dmv clerk to be a reliable source for breaking NFL news
Saxum Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 1 hour ago, Wsam4031 said: My god if they trade 12 for Nick Foles ill swan dive off Niagara falls I'll provide a diving board.
DefenseWins Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 Everybody, sit down and relax. Open up a brew and/or have a Toke. McBean has things under control. BILLIEVE in THE PROCESS!! A Top 3 QB is what the target is... That is what's gonna happen... I have seen it all in my crystal ball!
Tcali Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 we arent talking about trent dilfer here. lets get Foles AND the Baker.
That's No Moon Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 14 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said: Maybe it's 4pm Pacific?
Kangaxx Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 3 minutes ago, Tcali said: we arent talking about trent dilfer here. lets get Foles AND the Baker. Lets not.
Recommended Posts