Figster Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 A J McCarron anyone? Bills running out of options, If we draft a QB in the 1st does it really matter in the grand scheme of things?
Royale with Cheese Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 3 minutes ago, Jay_Fixit said: Not a done deal yet. I'm ok with McCown if that's the plan. As long as the Bills grab Darnold or Mayfield when they inevitably trade up. Not a fan or Rosen?
Kelly the Dog Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 McCarron or McCown is fine with me. That means backup to Darnold or Rosen. Bridewater is a bridge.
H2o Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 13 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: https://twitter.com/teddyb_h2o I'm innocent
Kirby Jackson Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 5 minutes ago, HappyDays said: It makes sense. I guess I'm a little disappointed we won't really be trying to win before the rookie is ready but it does make sense. Take 1 step backwards to take 2 steps forwards. I’m not sure that any of these placeholders are better today than Rosen or Mayfield. I don’t even believe that it is a step back. If they draft someone else they may need some time behind the vet.
CommonCents Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 Mike Glennon baby! This off season just keeps giving! 1
Gunsgoodtime Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 15 minutes ago, kirkwoodus13 said: for the money these scrubs are signing for, we should have kept Tyrod. Are any of these guys really better than Taylor? Sadly I'm getting to this point as well. Maybe should have kept him 1 more year
reddogblitz Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 10 minutes ago, HappyDays said: It makes sense. I guess I'm a little disappointed we won't really be trying to win before the rookie is ready but it does make sense. Take 1 step backwards to take 2 steps forwards. Let's not forget the "we're trying to win AND rebuild" part. I can't see McDermott going with a guy he doesn't think he can win with.
Happy Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 11 minutes ago, Misterbluesky said: NFLN just reported it..it's legit. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000920969/article/jets-working-on-a-deal-with-teddy-bridgewater 1
Jay_Fixit Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 8 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: Not a fan or Rosen? Not entirely, no. He’s my 3rd choice. 1
whatdrought Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 Makes sense for the Jets because he has a great upside:expectations ratio that makes him easier to use and loose if he does not pan out.
HappyDays Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 11 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: I’m not sure that any of these placeholders are better today than Rosen or Mayfield. I don’t even believe that it is a step back. If they draft someone else they may need some time behind the vet. Yeah it's becoming clear that our plan is to start the rookie sooner rather than later. That makes me think Josh Allen is out of the running, thank god. 1 1
Kirby Jackson Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 Just now, HappyDays said: Yeah it's becoming clear that our plan is to start the rookie sooner rather than later. That makes me think Josh Allen is out of the running, thank god. I’d agree that these actions make Allen less likely. That’s an interesting thought but probably true.
HappyDays Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 The other possibility is we have a deal in place for Foles. But that's seeming less and less likely.
Royale with Cheese Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 6 minutes ago, Jay_Fixit said: Not entirely, no. He’s my 3rd choice. Would Darnold be ready in his rookie year? I feel Mayfield would be but don't know too much about Darnold.
MILFHUNTER#518 Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 29 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: Not true, they may like 3 or 4 guys in this class. If you go up and get Rosen or Mayfield or Darnold it doesn’t matter who is the placeholder. He will only be playing the first few weeks at most. Statistically, only one or two of these quarterbacks will pan out. If we lose in the horse trading and don't get our guy, will it bring a smile to your face when you realize you have to watch Josh McCown for the next season or two and suck out 8-8? Just remember, as pretty as these kids look in shorts throwing at air, only one, possibly NONE of them are going to be franchise . 1
dulles Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 46 minutes ago, TOboy said: Will he be dancing too? That might endanger his knee...singing on the other hand... 1
ColoradoBills Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 Does a Bridgewater NYJ signing take the Jets out of the QB Draft picture? I can make an argument for yes and no. They could pick a non-QB at #6 and get a 2nd tier guy later. What do you guys think?
ProcessAccepted Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 47 minutes ago, Mrbojanglezs said: Welp.... It may be the Peterman show in 18 1
Nihilarian Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 18 minutes ago, HappyDays said: The other possibility is we have a deal in place for Foles. But that's seeming less and less likely. Maybe not. Perhaps the Eagles have told the Bills he will be available near/around training camp. Or maybe it was the Colts who were interested in Foles and want to trade Luck.
Recommended Posts