Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

No, It Would Cost More Then Because we be up against the deadline and the other teams would ask for more.

 

Let's do it now.

 

 

If it for a 2, yes

If it's for a 3 and they know Giants won't trade 2, yes

If it's for a 4... Yikes someone might jump us for a 3

Posted
4 minutes ago, Steptide said:

When beane trades up for 3rd overall pick I jizz in my pants 

If you wear an adult diaper it won't be too messy. Although you may have a lingering smell that is easily identifiable. :D

Posted

#3 scares me though. If we’re locked in on one QB, all it takes is for another team to trade up with Cleveland or NYG and get our guy.   Hopefully there are a couple QB’s that we love...

Posted
2 minutes ago, Boca BIlls said:

If it for a 2, yes

If it's for a 3 and they know Giants won't trade 2, yes

If it's for a 4... Yikes someone might jump us for a 3

 

Colts have the third so....

 

 

Posted

I really think the Browns take Barkley #1, meaning if you like 2 QBs at least one will be there at #3

 

There is a rumor that the Browns want Allen, so if they take Allen #1 and the Giants take Barkley #2 it sets up perfectly

Posted
8 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

Perfect guarantees one of the top 3 and more likely Mayfield, who I want anyway.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I like Mayfield. Is he worth all the draft picks it would cost though?

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Playoffs? said:

#3 scares me though. If we’re locked in on one QB, all it takes is for another team to trade up with Cleveland or NYG and get our guy.   Hopefully there are a couple QB’s that we love...

 

Cleveland isn't parting with either pick - they want Barkley AND a top QB

 

 

1 minute ago, TheFunPolice said:

 

Bills give Colts:

 

Hughes

#12

#22

higher 2nd rounder

 

Colts give Bills:

 

#3

 

YUCK - that's WAY too much.  I'd rather wait on the FA QBs to go and see who they can get at 5 or so.

Edited by BobChalmers
Posted

Makes sense, but I'd prefer 2nd---guarantees us either Mayfield or Rosen, and no one get jump ahead of us and steal one of them. At #3, Bills might be left with Darnold...which would suck...or Denver or the Jets might move up to 2 and take who we want anyway. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Playoffs? said:

#3 scares me though. If we’re locked in on one QB, all it takes is for another team to trade up with Cleveland or NYG and get our guy.   Hopefully there are a couple QB’s that we love...

 

Rosen/Mayfield/Darnold will go 1,2,3. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

No, It Would Cost More Then Because we be up against the deadline and the other teams would ask for more.

 

Let's do it now.

 

 

I disagree. You do it now, you give teams weeks to get in front of you again. 

Posted

What is good is the Bills have Giants who hate Patriots, and Browns who are the sad brother to the Bills. All teams can come together to make sure those three dominate the early draft 1,2,Bills,4

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Billschinatown said:

 

I like Mayfield. Is he worth all the draft picks it would cost though?

 

A franchise QB is worth whatever it takes.

 

We never now how any of these guys will do, but doing nothing guarantees failure.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Gamache518 said:

According to Buffalo report Bills reportedly have been talking to Colts in acquiring their 1st round draft pick (3). Both sides have been talking all day.

Holy !@#$?

Posted
Just now, oldmanfan said:

Or maybe they're talking about Luck.

 

In principle that would be sweet, but I can't imagine having faith in his shoulder if the Colts would part with him.  You have to assume the Colts know better than anyone how healthy he is.

×
×
  • Create New...