Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Anything's possible.   Beane's got a vision and he ain't afraid to go for it.   

 

Of course, as Badlands pointed out an hour ago, maybe Beane is a total lunatic off his medication.   

 

Who knows what's next?

 

Wednesday is going to be very interesting.  

Posted
Just now, LA Grant said:

 

Wouldn't surprise me to see both traded, at this point. Neither of them outperformed Eddie Yarborough last season IIRC... get what you can from them, replace them with rookies/cheaper UFAs.

 

 

Glenn was replaced by Dawkins.  Taylor is anticipated to be replaced by Rookie/Bridge (not to mention that offer was a really solid return).  

 

I wouldn't take it off the table, but our d-line already has holes.  Why add more?  

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Wayne Cubed said:

I don’t see his replacement anywhere, is the problem. They’d need 2 DEs and they are already in need of a DT or 2... 

 

At least DT's are available too.  Seeing that we'd be left with Lawson and Yarbrough as starters would be a bit of a concern though.  

Posted

I doubt it, unless the plan is to sign Kirk Cousins or save cap to rollover to next year for some big FA signings. You do need D-Line players and we aren't going to be able to field an all rookie team.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, dneveu said:

 

At least DT's are available too.  Seeing that we'd be left with Lawson and Yarbrough as starters would be a bit of a concern though.  

 

Massive concern... Hughes is here next year, IMO.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Wayne Cubed said:

 

Massive concern... Hughes is here next year, IMO.

If we keep next year's picks - who the hell cares...eat the cap hits ASAP and sign FAs that have a low hit this year and get paid next...

Posted
2 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said:

If we keep next year's picks - who the hell cares...eat the cap hits ASAP and sign FAs that have a low hit this year and get paid next...

 

There aren’t a great deal of DEs this year that are worth signing though. 

Posted
Just now, Wayne Cubed said:

 

There aren’t a great deal of DEs this year that are worth signing though. 

I concur, maybe getting caught up in the selling hype right now...

Posted
26 minutes ago, Juice_32 said:

It certainly wouldn't shock me. Hell at this point I'd expect Beane to get a 1st for him.

At this point I'd expect them to send Beans a 1st, an ownership stake, and thank you chicken wings.

Posted
15 minutes ago, dneveu said:

Glenn was replaced by Dawkins.  Taylor is anticipated to be replaced by Rookie/Bridge (not to mention that offer was a really solid return).  

 

I wouldn't take it off the table, but our d-line already has holes.  Why add more?  

 

Hopefully because they intend to beef up the front 7 with better players. Besides QB, our weakest area is probably DL/LB.

 

Lawson was next to useless last season, so whatever you can get for his potential is worth it. I think Hughes' most productive days may be behind him, or at least, what he brings is no longer outweighing his cost. 

 

I'm not saying we should bet the future on Yarborough, I'm saying that a guy like that was about as productive as Hughes/Lawson, if not moreso; therefore Hughes/Lawson are replaceable. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, LikeIGiveADarn said:

Hughes for Foles?

 

Schwartz got amazing production out of him, and I'm pretty sure the Eagles just cut a defensive lineman.

 

If that happened you might as well just bronze Beane now and plant him next to Ralph.

×
×
  • Create New...