par73 Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 If necessary, I can see Hughes involved in the next trade up. Has not been an impact player since Mario Williams left (who quit playing the year before he went). 1
cba fan Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 On 3/12/2018 at 11:01 PM, TheFunPolice said: I don't mean this as an insult to Hughes but I honestly forgot he was even on the team last season Expand I don't believe you.
Mark Vader Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 I am not for this. Trading Tyrod had to be done. I liked Cordy Glenn a lot, but trading him did make sense, as Dawkins stepped in for him and did a very good job. Trading Hughes when we are extremely thin at DE is far too risky and not that smart. We cannot go into the season being both weak at DE & DT. And I see no way that we can replenish our entire D-Line in both free agency and the draft this off season.
ILBillsfan Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 I think Hughes is gone. The Bills are focused on resetting where the money is spent on this team and I do not see Hughes contract fitting in. I also think Lawson is on the block because he does not fit this D On 3/13/2018 at 12:38 AM, Iamkrgr said: I could see McCoy being moved before Hughes. I don't think anything is off the table right now. Expand No way McCoy is moved
Augie Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 On 3/13/2018 at 1:24 AM, par73 said: If necessary, I can see Hughes involved in the next trade up. Has not been an impact player since Mario Williams left (who quit playing the year before he went). Expand It’s their MO, and so far I approve.
billspro Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 On 3/13/2018 at 12:29 AM, HappyDays said: I could see the Bucs taking Hughes to move down from 7 to 12. I think that might be enough. Expand I was just thinking that. The Bucs need a pass rusher bad. If we get the 7th pick we will be the only team with enough ammo to trade up into the top two.
KD in CA Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 On 3/13/2018 at 3:58 AM, Mark Vader said: I am not for this. Trading Tyrod had to be done. I liked Cordy Glenn a lot, but trading him did make sense, as Dawkins stepped in for him and did a very good job. Trading Hughes when we are extremely thin at DE is far too risky and not that smart. We cannot go into the season being both weak at DE & DT. And I see no way that we can replenish our entire D-Line in both free agency and the draft this off season. Expand They did it last year with the secondary!
Buffalo Barbarian Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 On 3/12/2018 at 9:15 PM, joesixpack said: I'd rather they send Lawson packing. Like sooner rather than later. Expand Thanks Rex , wonder what players we could have gotten instead of Lawson?
GreggTX Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 Our ONLY really good DL? Well if we want to completely suck on D and push Frazier to leave, OK. BTW, you can't just put all of our problems on Hughes who drew a lot of attention and played the run very well in 2017. He had almost NO help out there on the DL. Kyle was avg, Lawson was well below avg and the rest of our DT's are disgustingly bad. Let's try surrounding him with talent and see how it goes. If you want to trade underperformers, start with Shaq.
Big Blitz Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 Hughes and the 22nd gets us the 7th from Tampa at best imo. The 12th and 7th guarantee getting into the top 5 probably 3 and I'd do this without question.
Mark Vader Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 On 3/13/2018 at 4:06 AM, KD in CA said: They did it last year with the secondary! Expand Do you think they have the cap space to transform the entire D-Line, meanwhile ignoring other positions like LB, WR & OG?
Big Blitz Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 On 3/13/2018 at 3:58 AM, Mark Vader said: I am not for this. Trading Tyrod had to be done. I liked Cordy Glenn a lot, but trading him did make sense, as Dawkins stepped in for him and did a very good job. Trading Hughes when we are extremely thin at DE is far too risky and not that smart. We cannot go into the season being both weak at DE & DT. And I see no way that we can replenish our entire D-Line in both free agency and the draft this off season. Expand The Patriots have been doing this for 3 seasons plus now. Since they traded Chandler Jones
Not at the table Karlos Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 On 3/13/2018 at 4:28 AM, Big Blitz said: Hughes and the 22nd gets us the 7th from Tampa at best imo. The 12th and 7th guarantee getting into the top 5 probably 3 and I'd do this without question. Expand 12 and 7's value would be a little above the no 2 pick. Throw in our 2nd and it would be no 1.
Big Blitz Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 We've seen peak Hughes. Him and the 22nd is the next move up.
GrizzReaper Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 I like Hughes and really think his dip had more to do with the DL as a whole than just him. However if there is a good return on him Beane might as well do it. Clear the books and start from scratch. See how our Bills look in 2 years...
Agent 91 Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 On 3/12/2018 at 9:15 PM, joesixpack said: I'd rather they send Lawson packing. Like sooner rather than later. Expand Bradley Chubb has been lo need to the Colts at 3... i wonder if we package Lawson 12 and a 3 and 4 or something how much more it would take maybe a pick next out 2 year too
BuffaloBillsGospel Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 (edited) I hope so, he's been very meh since Pettine and Schwartz left here. Edited March 13, 2018 by BuffaloBillsGospel
ganesh Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 On 3/12/2018 at 9:14 PM, Reed83HOF said: Jay SkurskiVerified account @JaySkurski 33s34 seconds ago More In the past three days, the #Bills have traded the two biggest cap hits on their team in QB Tyrod Taylor and LT Cordy Glenn. The biggest cap hit now belongs to DE Jerry Hughes, at $10.4 million. It's worth pointing out Brandon Beane didn't sign Hughes to that contract. Expand We have zero pass rush. Pass rushers don't grow on trees. He is not being over-paid. Glenn trade was acceptable because the front office already had a player to replace him. However, that would not be the case with Hughes.
Recommended Posts