NoSaint Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 Just now, Boatdrinks said: He's on the wall for football reasons, nothing more. And he should be off it for non football reason. 4
Boatdrinks Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 Just now, NoSaint said: And he should be off it for non football reason. Debatable. Does Coy wire go on the wall then? Brian Moorman ?
BuffaloBillyG Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: He's on the wall for football reasons, nothing more. It's a privilege for a player to be up there. He lost the privilege. Sorry but his name up there is a black eye on the franchise and community. 1 1
outsidethebox Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Boatdrinks said: Debatable. Does Coy wire go on the wall then? Brian Moorman ? Moorman belongs on the wall IMHO 1
JaCrispy Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 (edited) 7 minutes ago, NoSaint said: And he should be off it for non football reason. Son- “Daddy, what does that name say on the stadium wall?” Dad- “That’s OJ Simpson, son.” Son- “Isn’t that the guy that killed those people?” Dad- “Nah, son...that was only a hypothetical...he’s a football legend.” Edited March 12, 2018 by JaCrispy 4 1
NoSaint Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Boatdrinks said: Debatable. Does Coy wire go on the wall then? Brian Moorman ? If the team wants to use them to represent the greatest bills- so be it. Wouldn’t be my choice but I wouldn’t be embarrassed seeing great men that are marginal players. Seeing a great player up there that is the same guy on tv talking about killing his wife— I’m down with that being a disqualifier for the football honor of being on the wall 1
Boatdrinks Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 Just now, No Place To Hyde said: It's a privilege for a player to be up there. He lost the privilege. Sorry but his name up there is a black eye on the franchise and community. Just playing devils advocate here. I'm not sure this interview changes anything. With its " hypotheticals " and all. I mean his book has been out forever. Was there anyone who believed this guy didn't do it before today? This is hardly a revelation.
vincec Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 Does this mean that he is going to bring to a close his relentless search for the true killers? 1 1
Mr. WEO Posted March 12, 2018 Author Posted March 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: Just playing devils advocate here. I'm not sure this interview changes anything. With its " hypotheticals " and all. I mean his book has been out forever. Was there anyone who believed this guy didn't do it before today? This is hardly a revelation. It was never published
NoSaint Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: Just playing devils advocate here. I'm not sure this interview changes anything. With its " hypotheticals " and all. I mean his book has been out forever. Was there anyone who believed this guy didn't do it before today? This is hardly a revelation. To be fair, my stance hasn’t changed in quite some time. i could kind of buy the not guilty verdict keeping him up there but once he started in on the “hypothetical” stuff i no longer buy the devils advocate argument. Even if you hang your hat on the “he wasn’t convicted” argument he sure as hell is doing this interview and wrote that book and deserves to be taken down. Edited March 12, 2018 by NoSaint
Boatdrinks Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 Just now, Mr. WEO said: It was never published Oops my bad. However, most everyone heard about it and found it ridiculous. " If I did it " . Of course he did. Pretty much everyone but deniers knew he did.
Mr. WEO Posted March 12, 2018 Author Posted March 12, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: Oops my bad. However, most everyone heard about it and found it ridiculous. " If I did it " . Of course he did. Pretty much everyone but deniers knew he did. So that's further reason to keep his name up on the wall? Because we've known all along? Interesting argument. My guess is the Bills have been hiding behind the not guilty verdict in order to not broach the topic of taking it down. He just confessed. that's why this is a big deal Edited March 12, 2018 by Mr. WEO
Zebrastripes Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 3 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: It was never published Yes it was
Boatdrinks Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 Just now, NoSaint said: To be fair, my stance hasn’t changed in quite some time. i could kind of buy the not guilty verdict keeping him up there but once he started in on the “hypothetical” stuff i no longer buy the devils advocate argument. Even if you hang your hat on the “he wasn’t convicted” argument he sure as hell is doing this interview and released that book and deserves to be taken down. Fair enough. I think virtually everyone knew the guy committed the crime, found guilty or not. I don't think anything has changed here. You'd be hard pressed to find a reasonable person that didn't think OJ did it before today. We will see what happens, if anything.
Joaquin1119 Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 OJ can just confessed that he did it. They can’t send him to jail for it. They said he already innocent
Boatdrinks Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: So that's further reason to keep his name up on the wall? Because we've known all along? Interesting argument. My guess is the Bills have been hiding behind the not guilty verdict in order to not broach the topic of taking it down. He just confessed. that's why this is a big deal It means everyone knew and it was still there. I'm not making predictions here. Take it down, pretend OJ never happened . Never existed. Take him out of the HOF too. Erase the history books. Edit: I doubt the Bills have been " hiding behind" anything. Everyone on earth knew the man committed murder , but was found not guilty in a court of law. Edited March 12, 2018 by Boatdrinks
FearLess Price Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 29 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: Something tells me he wanted to confess just to get it off his conscience He did it for that tv check and its residuals. Cmon bro.
Doc Brown Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 6 minutes ago, vincec said: Does this mean that he is going to bring to a close his relentless search for the true killers? He searched a lot of the golf courses so he must have found some kind of clue. 2 minutes ago, Joaquin1119 said: OJ can just confessed that he did it. They can’t send him to jail for it. They said he already innocent Did you go to law school? 2
NoSaint Posted March 12, 2018 Posted March 12, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: Fair enough. I think virtually everyone knew the guy committed the crime, found guilty or not. I don't think anything has changed here. You'd be hard pressed to find a reasonable person that didn't think OJ did it before today. We will see what happens, if anything. Essentially, I think this should/could be akin to the ray rice elevator video for the buffalo community. it shouldn’t take that but... sometimes it makes it real. It makes it much harder to point at the highlight reel when you have this to watch too. It gets real damn hard to say “yea he probably did it but wasn’t convicted” when you watch the man describe grabbing the knife on tv Edited March 12, 2018 by NoSaint
Recommended Posts