Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It takes a lot more than just the assemblage of good talent to become a great team. It's a start for the Browns, nothing more. 

Posted
Quote

Ironically for a team that is moving away from an analytics-driven approach, the quarterback the Browns have signed is one whose numbers often seem to deserve more praise from coaches and fans than he gets. Much of Taylor's value comes out of his ability to avoid turnovers, a feat he accomplishes while serving as an effective runner and throwing downfield more frequently than his critics suggest. Consider that Kizer had 22 interceptions as the Browns' starter last year; Taylor threw 16 picks over three seasons combined with the Bills.
 

At the same time, it would be foolish to stick Taylor in a traditional offense, drop him back from under center on most plays, and hope that he turns into Troy Aikman. Coach Hue Jackson needs to keep Taylor in the shotgun and build his offense around the threat of Taylor as a runner, which Rick Dennison didn't do in Buffalo last season. That should be just fine if the Browns draft Barkley; the Penn State star took 598 of his 671 carries out of the shotgun and averaged 5.8 yards per carry on those attempts. The potential first overall pick averaged 5.3 yards per carry on his 73 attempts from under center. As a bridge quarterback, Taylor is a massive upgrade on AJ McCarron, who seemed like an obvious target in free agency after the Browns tried to trade for him last season.

 

The New Browns? Making sense of a trade bonanza

Posted
51 minutes ago, DefenseWins said:

If the Bills acquired the 65th pick in the draft, how does Shefter say that the Browns STILL have 5 picks in the top 65 picks?

 

It should read that Buffalo has 5 of the top 65 picks...

 

That drafted quarterback figures to be taken first overall, and these trades cement that likelihood. Sam Darnold is the leader on the backstretch to be the top pick, with Josh Allen a length behind. The fourth pick would lean toward either running back Saquon Barkley, defensive back Minkah Fitzpatrick or defensive end Bradley Chubb.

 

Then the Browns have the first, third and 32nd picks in the second round, giving them three more chances to bring in a running back or a receiver or a left tackle as insurance for Joe Thomas' age and possible retirement.

Posted
38 minutes ago, simool said:

 

Right... Just like we were only going to win 6 games last season because of Tyrod... FFS.

 

Dorsey is a damn good GM.  Mark my words that Tyrod is going to stop the bleeding for Cleveland.

 

Huge difference. Buffalo has been an average team for years. Talk of the tank was a bunch of garbage, and I never played into that.

 

The Browns, on the other hand, have been the leagues WORST team for years. Getting them to 6 wins is an achievement and is a sign for better things to come.

 

Can't build Rome in a day, and you can't cure the Browns in a single off season (or apparently 3).

Posted
43 minutes ago, simool said:

 

Mark my words that Tyrod is going to stop the bleeding for Cleveland.

 

They play the Saints next year.    He will bleed all over the place.     

 

Flacco, Big Ben, and Andy D will be his new daddies.  

Posted
18 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

That drafted quarterback figures to be taken first overall, and these trades cement that likelihood. Sam Darnold is the leader on the backstretch to be the top pick, with Josh Allen a length behind. The fourth pick would lean toward either running back Saquon Barkley, defensive back Minkah Fitzpatrick or defensive end Bradley Chubb.

 

Then the Browns have the first, third and 32nd picks in the second round, giving them three more chances to bring in a running back or a receiver or a left tackle as insurance for Joe Thomas' age and possible retirement.

 

So Shefter should have said that the Browns still have 5 of the top 64 picks...

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, K-9 said:

It takes a lot more than just the assemblage of good talent to become a great team. It's a start for the Browns, nothing more. 

 

 

Well......yeah.......as Parcells said getting from the dregs up to a winning record was infinitely easier than getting from around 9 wins to 12 wins.

 

Obviously he took a 1-15 Dolphins team to the playoffs the next season.

 

But more recently the Jags were horrendous in 2016 and made the AFC Championship game in 2017..........the kind of infusion of talent they are capable of can get you in the playoff mix pretty quickly.    Not a brutal division they are in anymore either.   Bengals and Ravens are very vulnerable.

Posted
1 hour ago, simool said:

 

Right... Just like we were only going to win 6 games last season because of Tyrod... FFS.

 

Dorsey is a damn good GM.  Mark my words that Tyrod is going to stop the bleeding for Cleveland.

 

Especially if he is handing off to Barkley.

Posted
8 hours ago, PeterGriffin said:

Dorsey Dealin: The Browns Will Be a Much Better Team in '18

 

Cant do any worse

 

 

 

 

forgetting the "Hugh Factor" I take it.................

Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

forgetting the "Hugh Factor" I take it.................

 

Hefner?

 

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
9 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

Well......yeah.......as Parcells said getting from the dregs up to a winning record was infinitely easier than getting from around 9 wins to 12 wins.

 

Obviously he took a 1-15 Dolphins team to the playoffs the next season.

 

But more recently the Jags were horrendous in 2016 and made the AFC Championship game in 2017..........the kind of infusion of talent they are capable of can get you in the playoff mix pretty quickly.    Not a brutal division they are in anymore either.   Bengals and Ravens are very vulnerable.

 

 

Yes, but those those teams changed Head Coaches to get a new vibe in the room.  This is the same HC to take them to 1-31 and has been owned by the division.

 

Posted
4 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

 

 

Giving Sashi credit for accumulating picks and cap space while passing on Wentz and Watson and fielding a 1-31 team the past two years seems like a dubious conclusion.

 

He's right up there with Buddy Nix on kickin' QB decisions down the road.

 

Best thing Beane has going for him is that he didn't personally pass on Watson himself last spring........even though I think McD and Beane were already in cahoots by then.:devil:

Posted
Just now, BADOLBILZ said:

Giving Sashi credit for accumulating picks and cap space while passing on Wentz and Watson and fielding a 1-31 team the past two years seems like a dubious conclusion.

 

He's right up there with Buddy Nix on kickin' QB decisions down the road.

 

Best thing Beane has going for him is that he didn't personally pass on Watson himself last spring........even though I think McD and Beane were already in cahoots by then.:devil:

 

Agree. His mistake was not getting the QB despite multiple chances to do so. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Rochesterfan said:

 

 

Yes, but those those teams changed Head Coaches to get a new vibe in the room.  This is the same HC to take them to 1-31 and has been owned by the division.

 

 

 

There is that.

 

I think the Tyrod acquisition is ALL about trying to preserve Hue.    Firing bad coaches is a necessary evil but having to fire competent HC's because players stop listening to their message is a big problem.   They obviously believe in Hue and I am sure they realize they've thrown him to the wolves and he deserves to show what he can do while the incubate their young franchise QB.    They need a QB like Tyrod who isn't going to lose games but is also a catalyst when added to explosive WR talent.........this is a great fit for TT and if Hue can't make it work then maybe he's not the guy they think he is after all. 

×
×
  • Create New...