Steptide Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 (edited) 12 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: I heart you Beane And in some way, we traded Tyrod for Benjamin, but for a higher 3rd. Love it. Or I should say, without losing our 3rd and moving it up Edited March 9, 2018 by Steptide
26CornerBlitz Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 No doubt. I'm still believe they will take Darnold.
Boatdrinks Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 4 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Tyrod definitely respected in that room, though I doubt Preston returns for '18. Anyway, Taylors a good guy, but this is a good move for the Bills in their quest to fix the QB position. 1
Turk71 Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 2 minutes ago, Call_Of_Ktulu said: I would sign McCarron and trade up and draft Mayfield. If this happens I am predicting quick turn around. What has McCarron ever done and what would you pay him. You would be going into the season with 3 unproven qbs. I ddon't like that plan. 1
BillsFan4 Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 4 minutes ago, Real McCoy said: They will prob send a 2nd and this 3rd for him. I'd be content as hell with Foles, Rudolph or Jackson That's what I was thinking as well. A 2nd + Philly's 3rd. I think that's a bit steep but shoot, Tyrod just went for pick #65, so.... Id be ok with Foles and Rudolph. Id be a whole lot happier with Foles and Rosen/Darnold/Mayfield though. Or even Rosen/Darnold/Mayfield and a scrap heap veteran... lol. I want one one of the top 3 QBs so bad! Im just worried that they will be content with Foles (if they trade for him). I'll be really bummed if that's the case.
BillsSbSoon Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 29 minutes ago, BillsFan4 said: Wow!! So, are we trading up? Trading for Foles? Signing a vet? please let us be trading up!!!!!!!!! For some reason, I have a feeling we are going to trade for Foles. If we do, I just hope they still go hard after a QB in the draft. No way its for foles imo. Were coming for rosen!!!!! Browns will take barkley 1. The trade will be with either giants or colts. Guessing gettleman told beane to get another third. Giants will trade out and get eli a bunch of help. 2 1
astb41 Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 notice how so far only DEF players have tweeted about the trade 2
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 2 minutes ago, bobobonators said: We’re so loaded in this draft. 2 firsts 2 seconds 2 third rounders can we just sign Cousins. Give him anything. We can use the entire draft to fill holes we have so many picks. ...and that would be firing blanks....VERY expensive ones......NO...........
OldTimer1960 Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 Absolutely thrilled with getting the 65th pick for Taylor. I thought that they would get at best a 4th- happily i was wrong.
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 Good trade since they were moving in a different direction, but Cleveland just got a lot better and the Bills a lot worse. 1
dgrochester55 Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 As I am processing this, good move for both teams. For Cleveland, Taylor is miles ahead of anyone that they had at QB last season. They can draft someone, but they have a starter if not. For Buffalo after Taylor was benched, the writing was on the wall. They got more for him than anyone expected. I am certain that a plan is in place for quarterback if this move was made. No way they would do this if there was any chance that they were coming into the season with Peterman as their top choice. Clean break. Taylor went from a career backup to a three year starter, and Buffalo broke the curse during his time. Best quarterback that we had since arguably Flutie but it was time to move ahead. He has my respect and I wish him the best of luck. 8
apuszczalowski Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 I think this is to free up space and not have to move up. Get cap space to sign one of the FAs then see what falls to them. If not this could be a bad move cause all the teams interested in dealing with them know the Bills are desperate with a barely NFL capable QB on the roster and no more veteran bridge QB. 1
GG Posted March 9, 2018 Author Posted March 9, 2018 9 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: How are n earth did you beat yolo and 26??? Blind squirrel moment. Just happened to have the phone on me when Sportscenter started 1
BillsFanForever19 Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 How in the hell did he convince the Browns to give up the first pick in Round 3 AND pick up the 6 million bonus?! Sensational!
YoloinOhio Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 3 minutes ago, BadLandsMeanie said: He must still be loopy from that dirty hit. Good guy though. Tre is the bomb. But Tyrod is not an all star. Let’s see some WRs weigh in. Oh. TEs? Nah 1
BillsFan4 Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 4 minutes ago, NewEraBills said: If they trade for Foles it's probably because they don't have the ammo that teams are asking for to get into those top spots. You trade for Foles, take a guy like Rudolph or White in round two or three. Yeah, unfortunately, I'm kind of thinking this might be the plan. I cant see them giving up a 2nd + more for Foles and still trading up. But lets see if they even trade for Foles first... Ill lose it if they give up a 1st for him like the Eagles want.
Boatdrinks Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, DefenseWins said: Why is everyone I see assuming that we are "trading" for Foles? Isn't signing McCarron at least as likely? Or Bridgewater even as a bridge? If they sign a vet QB, ( I think they will) I don't see it being McCarron. Makes the least sense to me as a vet QB should at least be a bridge starter to a rook draft pick. Edited March 9, 2018 by Boatdrinks
TPS Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 3 minutes ago, NewEraBills said: If they trade for Foles it's probably because they don't have the ammo that teams are asking for to get into those top spots. You trade for Foles, take a guy like Rudolph or White in round two or three. I bet it was the bills who offered a second for Foles. I could see the eagles taking the 53 and 65 for him. They need cheap new bodies.
BillsFan4 Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 3 minutes ago, BillsSbSoon said: No way its for foles imo. Were coming for rosen!!!!! Browns will take barkley 1. The trade will be with either giants or colts. Guessing gettleman told beane to get another third. Giants will trade out and get eli a bunch of help. I hope like hell you are right man! I would be beyond thrilled.
Boatdrinks Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 1 minute ago, BillsFan4 said: Yeah, unfortunately, I'm kind of thinking this might be the plan. I cant see them giving up a 2nd + more for Foles and still trading up. But lets see if they even trade for Foles first... Ill lose it if they give up a 1st for him like the Eagles want. I don't think any team gives a first for Foles.
Recommended Posts