OldTimeAFLGuy Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Buddo said: QB aside, it's not an especially 'deep' draft generally, from what one or two people who know better than I, have been saying. Makes trading up a more likely scenario than it would ordinarily. Not so much point accumulating a bunch of lower round picks, if they aren't going to be used on anyone decent, due to a talent drop off. ...good assessment.....my unsubstantiated hunch is that McBeane will covet the two 1sts and two 2nds, selecting versus moving....again a guess......sure he talked "franchise QB" but what is HIS definition?......what if he goes OL/DL or DL/OL depending on HIS preference with the 1sts and looks to the 2nd for what he deems is HIS franchise QB?.....that tier could include Rudolph and certainly Falk, Lauletta, White, etc......regardless, fasten your seatbelt for a whole bunch of upset TBD posters no matter what he does..... Edited March 9, 2018 by OldTimeAFLGuy 1
LABILLBACKER Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 34 minutes ago, BuffaloBillsGospel said: Or the Browns have all the QB's rated close so they can take RB at 1 and they can wait for the pick of the litter at 4. this is what I'd do. Guarantee you land Barkley and you're bound to have a top 3 qb available @ 4.
RochesterRob Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 7 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: I'll assume you're agreeing with my posts? I think the Browns will move up to two, as my posts indicate. It's possible they sit and wait, but I think it's more likely they will set themselves up to get the players they want. Barkley AND their top rated QB. Yes, I do agree with you. With the amount of picks Cleveland has why chance somebody falling to 4 if you have a guy graded substantially above the others? I would be worried about the quality of these QB's if other teams were kind of "meh" about moving up themselves. It's either one of more of these guys are really good and teams will offer vast riches to move up to get them or these guys are seen as being flawed and if a top 5 team bites on a small trade package then fine otherwise they wait for these prospects to fall and acquire them for far less capital.
billsredneck1 Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 1 hour ago, kdiggz said: What do you think? Daniel JeremiahVerified account @MoveTheSticks FollowFollow @MoveTheSticks More Interesting scenario -- NYG Trade back 2 spots (CLE comes back up for Barkely/QB) then BUF trades up to 4th pick for QB. CLE gets Barkley/QB, BUF gets their QB and NYG get massive amount of picks in 2018 & 2019. Thoughts? Also... IB ? @incarceratedbob 7h7 hours ago More **UPDATED NFL RUMORS** Bills still in talks with teams in top 10 #NFLDraft trying to move up. Foles talks could start up at anytime again (Teddy Bridgewater another name to keep eyes on) WR's Marqise Lee/Taylor Gabriel could be on radar. i am not going to subscribe to this....even though it could happen. trading tyrod does not in any way tip beane's hand draft wise. the fact that we just made a deal with cleveland and gained a very good pick just means the fo is stockpiling the arsenal for a no. of possible scenarios. maybe they still sign a.j. day one. maybe that 3rd rd. pick is part of a requirement for foles. maybe they do have a draft day trade already in the works. maybe they will stay at 21 and roll with the picks. they are playing a very sharp game right now. best off season entertainment ever.
Recommended Posts