Reed83HOF Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 Just now, aristocrat said: They don’t have the cap space he will go to Indy I was being a turd btw...but that would also be our luck...
Kwai San Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 5 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said: He will go to NE Sad - hopefully not true but SAD....
BillsFan130 Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 I don’t believe any Miami rumours unless it’s saviorpetermans sources 2
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 1 minute ago, billsfan11 said: I don’t believe any Miami rumours unless it’s saviorpetermans sources Gase and Tannenbaum play 4D chess everyone else plays checkers! 1
Reed83HOF Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 Chris Trapasso @ChrisTrapasso 34s34 seconds ago True. Suh would rep a $9.1M dead cap hit and a $13.1M dead cap hit in 2019 if he’s a post-June 1 cut.
BillsFan4 Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 34 minutes ago, Ittakestime said: Post June does nothing but push damage to next year. Better off taking the hit at once and get it over with. Yeah but right now Miami is currently over the cap by $8 million. They have to be compliant in a bit less than 6 days (4pm March 14th). Next year they have about $57 million in cap space. Under normal circumstances it would probably be best to eat all that dead cap right away. But if Miami cuts Suh, it'll probably be because they decided to do it to be cap compliant. So in this instance it probably wouldn't make sense, since it would only free about $3M this year (and they need at least $8M just to be cap compliant, plus they'll need more to sign their draft picks, and even more if they want to try and sign any free agents).
YoloinOhio Posted March 9, 2018 Author Posted March 9, 2018 I think they can still pull Landry’s tag if they can’t trade him. That’s taking a up a chunk of cap. 1
Reed83HOF Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 Just now, YoloinOhio said: I think they can still pull Landry’s tag if they can’t trade him. That’s taking a up a chunk of cap. I think Landry signed it today....too late to pull now?
YoloinOhio Posted March 9, 2018 Author Posted March 9, 2018 4 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said: I think Landry signed it today....too late to pull now? Ah that’s right. Now they need to either trade him or work out an extension or they are locked in at that amount. 1
Reed83HOF Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 3 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Ah that’s right. Now they need to either trade him or work out an extension or they are locked in at that amount. Yup and as Chris notes: Chris Trapasso @ChrisTrapasso 5m5 minutes ago Miami currently close to $8M over the cap They are F7cked
Mark Vader Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 9 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Ah that’s right. Now they need to either trade him or work out an extension or they are locked in at that amount. Wow! Is there any other team that is willing to pay Landry that much?
SinceThe70s Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 40 minutes ago, T-Bomb said: Why does it seem like D-Linemen have a habit of not performing up to their big money contracts? I have no stats on this, but it just seems like that group are the worst offenders. I agree with the sentiment. Maybe it's because the position is valued/compensated very highly for the top end performers. The Haynesworth contract a few years back was a nightmare. At the same time I'm not sure if any team that signed Ted Washington was disappointed.
H2o Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 Anything that helps to weaken a division rival is a win. 19 minutes ago, Mark Vader said: Wow! Is there any other team that is willing to pay Landry that much? Nope Anyone that works out a trade would certainly have a deal in place to probably cut that cap number in half.
YoloinOhio Posted March 9, 2018 Author Posted March 9, 2018 33 minutes ago, Mark Vader said: Wow! Is there any other team that is willing to pay Landry that much? The Bears and Browns have been rumored to be very interested. The issue is that to trade someone on a tag, the player needs to also have an interest in signing with the other team long term or the team isn’t going to give up assets for a 1 year rental. That’s why it’s hard to trade a guy on a tag and it rarely happens. You need to identify a team who 1) wants the player 2) has the cap space 3) is willing to give up assets 4) is willing to pay the player’s asking price and 5) is a team the player is open to signing with long term. This is usually a short list. 2
BillsFan4 Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 3 hours ago, YoloinOhio said: Ah that’s right. Now they need to either trade him or work out an extension or they are locked in at that amount. Damn. I didn't know they had to carry the dead cap until June 2nd if they cut him and designate it post June 1st. So cutting him right now doesn't do much to help them get cap compliant. I figured that was the main reason they were discussing Suh as a possible cut...
MJS Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 5 hours ago, aristocrat said: He was the fifth best dt in the league last year. He’s lived up to his deal The problem is there is NO way to live up to such a monster deal like that as an interior defensive lineman.
FearLess Price Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 Cuttin Suh also means they cudnt find anyone to take that contract in a trade. Suh and Dareus are the reason DTs wont be handed massive contracts for a while
aristocrat Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 7 minutes ago, FearLess Price said: Cuttin Suh also means they cudnt find anyone to take that contract in a trade. Suh and Dareus are the reason DTs wont be handed massive contracts for a while Aaron Donald 2
Recommended Posts