Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, teef said:

that's the way to be.  i wouldn't ask the question of anyone, but if someone asked me, i'd take it lightly, probably make a joke about it, and move on.  i don't getting up and walking out of the interview comments.  just respond and move on.

 

The only reason to not walk out is because it's the NFL and they're the only one hiring those with pro football skills. 

If I was interviewing for a marketing job and someone said "Hey, I heard your mom sells herself.  How do you feel about that?".  My response would likely be a three pronged "Excuse me?  F you.  I'm out." :beer:

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, LABillzFan said:

 

It doesn't matter if Guice thinks it's a big deal. The sports media will run this because you must care as they do. (In fact, why do you still call the Redskins by their name, you offensive fool!)
 

And then the rest of the media will play it up.

 

And by tomorrow afternoon a team will be fined and have to issue an apology, followed by countless Michael Sam interviews, and before it's all done, the NFL will make the offending team wear rainbow colors for their Thursday Night Football Color Rush.

 

Mark it.

 

Can't be worse then some of the ones we've seen.... 

Posted
1 minute ago, GoBills808 said:

That's ONE way to be. Another appropriate reaction would be to examine whether that question violated your civil rights and respond accordingly.

you could, but to me it's an amazing waste of time and energy.  i'd try to use it as an opportunity to show how questions wouldn't rattle me.  i honestly wouldn't bat an eye at it.  that said, again, i would never ask someone that question in an interview.  

1 minute ago, Misterbluesky said:

Well...are you gay?

how much cocaine have i done?

Posted

These interviews are job interviews for the players and teams. The entire point of them is for the teams to get to sit down and talk to players they feel they might be interested in employing. It's just like any other job out there, the potential employer brings you in and asks you questions to determine if they want to employ you. The only difference is they get chosen/hired through a draft instead of the employer making them an offer.

 

It's great for him that he is just brushing it off. Still doesn't make it acceptable or better. He may just be saying that because he doesn't want it to ruin any chances with his future career right now. He like everyone else has watched what happens when you stand up (or kneel) for a cause or belief, imagine what would happen if he stood up and complained about being wronged in this situation.

 

 

This is also why Hollywood is such a mess right now after years of people just sitting back and accepting things as they are even though they were wronged.

Posted
2 hours ago, TheTruthHurts said:

I think questions that are sensitive should be fair game. NFL players are public figures and will experience much worse as a player. How they respond should be important. 

 

Apart from the fact that it's, you know, illegal. 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

It doesn't matter if Guice thinks it's a big deal. The sports media will run this because you must care as they do. (In fact, why do you still call the Redskins by their name, you offensive fool!)

 

Or because it's inappropriate, against league policies and borderline illegal.   

Edited by Heitz
Posted
1 minute ago, Heitz said:

 

The only reason to not walk out is because it's the NFL and they're the only one hiring those with pro football skills. 

If I was interviewing for a marketing job and someone said "Hey, I heard your mom sells herself.  How do you feel about that?".  My response would likely be a three pronged "Excuse me?  F you.  I'm out." :beer:

that's fair too.  this is an opportunity to possibly get a bump in salary/position, so i'd be guarded with the overreaction.  on the same note, i'm just someone who doesn't care.  

Just now, joesixpack said:

 

when's the last time you beat your wife?

 

do you consider a verbal assault a real beating?

Posted
Just now, teef said:

you could, but to me it's an amazing waste of time and energy.  i'd try to use it as an opportunity to show how questions wouldn't rattle me.  i honestly wouldn't bat an eye at it.  that said, again, i would never ask someone that question in an interview.  

It depends on the person being asked, obviously, but it's definitely not a waste of time and energy. We live in a litigious society informed by the rule of law, so any potential examination of refining existing law or establishing precedent has societal value.  

Posted
Just now, joesixpack said:

 

#youtoo?

 

#tonguelashing4eva

Just now, GoBills808 said:

It depends on the person being asked, obviously, but it's definitely not a waste of time and energy. We live in a litigious society informed by the rule of law, so any potential examination of refining existing law or establishing precedent has societal value.  

this **** is deep.

Posted
Just now, teef said:

that's fair too.  this is an opportunity to possibly get a bump in salary/position, so i'd be guarded with the overreaction.  on the same note, i'm just someone who doesn't care.  

 

IRL, I likely would too, but certainly wouldn't be like "No, ha ha - that's a funny question."  I too don't really care, which would make me more likely to challenge the person asking the question.  Even if it didn't really upset me, I'd still know it was wrong, IMO. :D 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Heitz said:

The only reason to not walk out is because it's the NFL and they're the only one hiring those with pro football skills. 

If I was interviewing for a marketing job and someone said "Hey, I heard your mom sells herself.  How do you feel about that?".  My response would likely be a three pronged "Excuse me?  F you.  I'm out." :beer:

Are you interviewing for a position that requires you to answer questions that are unscripted while representing the company on a regular basis?

Posted
Just now, Heitz said:

 

IRL, I likely would too, but certainly wouldn't be like "No, ha ha - that's a funny question."  I too don't really care, which would make me more likely to challenge the person asking the question.  Even if it didn't really upset me, I'd still know it was wrong, IMO. :D 

oh yeah.  it's an absurd question.  the main reason i'd kid around about it is mostly because it's how i handle awkward situations.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Heitz said:

 

Or because it's inappropriate, against league policies and borderline illegal.   

 

Do you genuinely believe THOSE are the reasons the sports media jumps on it? :lol:

Posted
1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

 

Do you think NFL teams are actually going to make a decision about a player based on how he responds to a dumb question? Come to think of it the average NFL front office is incredibly dumb and it wouldn't surprise me if some team actually thinks this matters.

 

That's the key point to me, is that apparently some NFL teams have Australopithecines crafting their player assessment.

Please, guys, advance your psychological assessment techniques to at least Neanderthal.

 

 

Posted

You can tell who the straight white males are by the responses. The ones that haven't had to face actual discrimination before because of something. They are typically the ones saying it wouldn't bother them, they would just laugh it off  or move along. "Why can't you ask it to see if it rattles someone?"

 

It's a bit different when your a person who happens to be Gay, or Black, or something else that may have been descrimnated upon  in the past. It's not so easy to just laugh it off and take no offence when you have never lived it. It's also why people are taking more of a stand over things like this. Because if the NFL just accepts it and let's it go on, its saying it's still acceptable to do it because you may have had a reason for asking it (to gauge a reaction)

Posted
1 minute ago, apuszczalowski said:

You can tell who the straight white males are by the responses. The ones that haven't had to face actual discrimination before because of something. They are typically the ones saying it wouldn't bother them, they would just laugh it off  or move along. "Why can't you ask it to see if it rattles someone?"

 

It's a bit different when your a person who happens to be Gay, or Black, or something else that may have been descrimnated upon  in the past. It's not so easy to just laugh it off and take no offence when you have never lived it. It's also why people are taking more of a stand over things like this. Because if the NFL just accepts it and let's it go on, its saying it's still acceptable to do it because you may have had a reason for asking it (to gauge a reaction)

or certain people just aren't bothered by a question.  it completely depends on the personality and the question.  i have an aunt that's been with her partner since 1983.  she came out to us years ago, and has such a fantastic sense of humor about it.  on the flip side, i have a gay brother in law.  he's not someone i'd ever consider kidding around about it with.  

×
×
  • Create New...