Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, TheTruthHurts said:

I think questions that are sensitive should be fair game. NFL players are public figures and will experience much worse as a player. How they respond should be important. 

 

problem is you can't ask an employee that so it could violate federal law

  • Like (+1) 7
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

 

Remnants of the Neanderthal faction still in existence. If a person hasn't learned to adapt to the modern world and know what is appropriate or not at this point then they will never. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Doesn't this happen every year?

 

Phillip Rivers, who was drafted 14 years ago, said that teams intentionally try to get under your skin to see how you react to "adversity".

 

They inquired about Guice's mom hooking, ffs.

Posted

What kind of a moron asks someone something like this in a job interview. If Goodell was worth a lick, which IMHO he isn't, he'd find out right away who this was an make an example out of him. Pathetic.

Posted
Just now, Chicken Boo said:

Doesn't this happen every year?

 

Phillip Rivers, who was drafted 14 years ago, said that teams intentionally try to get under your skin to see how you react to "adversity".

 

They inquired about Guice's mom hooking, ffs.

 

If I found out this is how the Bills are testing a player's ability to test adversity I would feel really embarrassed. I don't know if this is strictly illegal but it is stupid.

  • Like (+1) 8
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BuffaloBillsGospel said:

These are the same lines of questions our own police force uses as a way to see how you react out in the field. The psychological exam for State Trooper would ask you far worse questions than these.

 

THIS. 

 

They ask these types of questions routinely to see how they react, not for their answer. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, TheTruthHurts said:

I think questions that are sensitive should be fair game. NFL players are public figures and will experience much worse as a player. How they respond should be important. 

 

WTF, man, if you can't get in someone's head without being offensive, you need to Get Out More.

5 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

If I found out this is how the Bills are testing a player's ability to test adversity I would feel really embarrassed. I don't know if this is strictly illegal but it is stupid.

 

I agree.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Besides being against the law for a potential employer to do, honestly who gives a sh*t? If my QB is a good player I could care less if he wants to marry a squid!

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted
8 minutes ago, BuffaloBillsGospel said:

These are the same lines of questions our own police force uses as a way to see how you react out in the field. The psychological exam for State Trooper would ask you far worse questions than these.

What state are you describing here? What does asking someone of their sexuality or about their mothers prove? 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

Doesn't this happen every year?

Phillip Rivers, who was drafted 14 years ago, said that teams intentionally try to get under your skin to see how you react to "adversity".

They inquired about Guice's mom hooking, ffs.

 

Getting under your skin is one thing, asking if you like men or your mom is a prostitute, is something else.  If you can't do the former without the latter, like I said you need to get out more.

  • Like (+1) 5
×
×
  • Create New...