LabattBlue Posted March 7, 2018 Posted March 7, 2018 4 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Not really. He’s worth more as part of a package than he is straight up for a draft pick. I don’t know about “key piece” because the key pieces are the 2 1sts and maybe next year’s 1st. Some teams want a player too and he would be that player. Please explain how he is worth more as part of a package? Does he somehow become less injured and more of a quality LT because he is being packaged with a #1 pick? His value is the same no matter what.
YoloinOhio Posted March 7, 2018 Posted March 7, 2018 1 minute ago, LabattBlue said: Please explain how he is worth more as part of a package? Does he somehow become less injured and more of a quality LT because he is being packaged with a #1 pick? His value is the same no matter what. if his value straight up is a 4th, and the Bills would rather trade him than trade a 4th, and the other team needs a LT and would rather have him than a mid round draft pick, and no other team has a starting caliber LT to offer up as part of a package (likely), his value is higher in a package as a “sweetener”. Same reason why Washington’s offer of throwing in the CB with the 3rd allowed them to succeed in the Alex smith trade over the Browns, who had no starting caliber CB to offer.
Reed83HOF Posted March 7, 2018 Posted March 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: if his value straight up is a 4th, and the Bills would rather trade him than trade a 4th, and the other team needs a LT and would rather have him than a mid round draft pick, and no other team has a starting caliber LT to offer up as part of a package (likely), his value is higher in a package as a “sweetener”. Same reason why Washington’s offer of throwing in the CB with the 3rd allowed them to succeed in the Alex smith trade over the Browns, who had no starting caliber CB to offer. It also allowed them to flip Peters...
Jamie Muellers Ghost Posted March 7, 2018 Posted March 7, 2018 (edited) after seeing the other trades this week so far I would say 4th if he has a good medical report and physical and a team is enough interested perhaps a 3rd Edited March 7, 2018 by Jamie Muellers Ghost
OldTimer1960 Posted March 7, 2018 Posted March 7, 2018 1 hour ago, KelsaysLunchbox said: His trade value is nowhere close to the value he could have to this team if healthy. Agreed. I hope that they keep him and he is healthy.
JohnC Posted March 7, 2018 Posted March 7, 2018 1 hour ago, thebandit27 said: Duane Brown hadn't been on the field for the final 4 games of 2016 and held out for the first 6 of 2017, and he fetched 2nd and 3rd round picks. Cordy Glenn missed the final 8 games of 2017, but has a LT contract already and won't be holding out. The OL with a healthy Cordy playing on the right or left side is better than without him. I'll even go so far to say that Cordy playing either guard position makes the line better. Without a doubt there are many factors that have to be considered related to health and contract. But losing him creates another hole while keeping him bolsters a line that needs bolstering. Unless he is used as a chip to acquire a qb I would prefer to keep him. He's not a flashy or prominent player but he is a good player. If he is subtracted from the unit the line will be diminished.
BuffaloBillyG Posted March 7, 2018 Posted March 7, 2018 43 minutes ago, horned dogs said: When we draft Josh Rosen to be the franchise QB it will be much clearer! And when Rosen gets knocked senseless from a DE because they couldn't protect him...he won't see anything clearly. You draft a franchise QB you need to gather pass protection...not trade it away.
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 43 minutes ago, KelsaysLunchbox said: And when Rosen gets knocked senseless from a DE because they couldn't protect him...he won't see anything clearly. You draft a franchise QB you need to gather pass protection...not trade it away. Oh come on man that is a feeble argument for drafting a franchise QB...he might get hurt.
Chicken Boo Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 2 hours ago, KelsaysLunchbox said: His trade value is nowhere close to the value he could have to this team if healthy. Exactly. If it isn't at least a 2nd in a draft day trade scenario for a QB, keep him.
BuffaloBillyG Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 9 minutes ago, horned dogs said: Oh come on man that is a feeble argument for drafting a franchise QB...he might get hurt. No, it's a solid argument for keeping a talented tackle to protect your franchise QB. Never said don't draft a QB.
Cripple Creek Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 3 hours ago, BillsGuru4 said: Last years nagging ankle injury really hurts his value. If that ankle is healed, id love to keep him and slide him to the right side. He is more versatile than dawkins who can only play left What makes you say this?
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 19 minutes ago, KelsaysLunchbox said: No, it's a solid argument for keeping a talented tackle to protect your franchise QB. Never said don't draft a QB. No, its a crappy argument that you shouldn't trade a tackle as part of a package to move up and get an elite QB.
BuffaloBillyG Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 13 minutes ago, horned dogs said: No, its a crappy argument that you shouldn't trade a tackle as part of a package to move up and get an elite QB. "Elite" and never taken an NFL snap. Oh Jesus...help this child. 1
HamSandwhich Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 3 hours ago, TheElectricCompany said: Let's go with a ham sandwich. Mmmm mmmmm
BillsGuru4 Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 14 hours ago, Cripple Creek said: What makes you say this? They tried him at right, hes not as fluid
Cripple Creek Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 10 hours ago, BillsGuru4 said: They tried him at right, hes not as fluid Don't remember that.
Logic Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 (edited) As much as it SEEMS like Cordy's value should be a 2nd or 3rd roundpick, I sense the reality is something more like a 5th or 6th round pick. Strange days, indeed. Edited March 9, 2018 by Logic
The Frankish Reich Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 On 3/7/2018 at 2:09 PM, kdiggz said: 4th, he hasn't proven he's healthy I wish. Right now, his value is negative. As in, Glenn + a 5th rounder for someone's 6th rounder. He's got 3 years left on his contract, $20 million guaranteed, too much dead cap to cut him until after the 2019 season. He would never get $20 million guaranteed as a free agent now. Why would anyone assume that contract AND give up something of value in a trade for him?
simpleman Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 (edited) Unless he is still injured, why would you trade him. I thought "Cheap Ralph" was finally gone. When he was healthy he was one of the better tackles in the NFL. The odds of getting a starter in the 4th round or lower are terrible. This gambling addition rampant among the TBD posters is amazing. Our O line is already a major concern and weakness on the team. Weakening it further is foolish. You want to bring in a rookie QB and destroy his potential behind a turnstyle O-line. With him gone your oline has a good but aging LG, that just lost their anchoring center, and an up and coming Tackle coming off his rookie year. There is no guarantee Dawkins will continue his growth, especially if you throw him on a line with more rookies and marginally talented players. Edited March 9, 2018 by simpleman 1
Boatdrinks Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 (edited) Trade values across the league seem low. Teams are trading players to free up cap room, and they're accepting low compensation to do so. Pro Bowl CB Talib for a 5th? Ogletree nets a 4th and 6th. Especially with the injury issues , Glenn isn't going to bring in any kind of draft pick bonanza. Edited March 9, 2018 by Boatdrinks
Recommended Posts