Matt_In_NH Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 Bears at #5...ouch. Must be nice to be the Pats and be at #15....ridiculous 1
Kirby Jackson Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 I’m not sure that this really says anything other than the teams that have high priced QBs under contract the longest spend the most. Just now, mattynh said: Bears at #5...ouch. Must be nice to be the Pats and be at #15....ridiculous Those 2 are outliers for sure. 1
HereComesTheReignAgain Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 Just now, mattynh said: Must be nice to be the Pats and be at #15....ridiculous They don't count illegal side payments to player owned businesses... 3 1
26CornerBlitz Posted March 5, 2018 Author Posted March 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: I’m not sure that this really says anything other than the teams that have high priced QBs under contract the longest spend the most. Those 2 are outliers for sure. It says choose carefully and spend wisely.
BigBuff423 Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 What's hilarious is that St. Louis, Philadelphia, and Minnesota are all on that list with the top player being the same guy: Sam Bradford. Wow....his agent must be a genius living on an island with some hot local talent bringing him cold drinks somewhere.....damn. 3 1
26CornerBlitz Posted March 5, 2018 Author Posted March 5, 2018 Just now, BigBuff423 said: What's hilarious is that St. Louis, Philadelphia, and Minnesota are all on that list with the top player being the same guy: Sam Bradford. Wow....his agent must be a genius living on an island with some hot local talent bringing him cold drinks somewhere.....damn. How about Osweiler for the Texans and Browns. 1 1
boyst Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 7 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: I’m not sure that this really says anything other than the teams that have high priced QBs under contract the longest spend the most. Those 2 are outliers for sure. It helps when there's an agenda to be against Tyrod Taylor when you post things like this. It really is devoid of any information which helps construct an argument that the bills are either in good position or bad position. Some teams are starting a rookie quarterback with draft contracts in sending their backup position. Other teams might have a cheap rookie contract as their starter with an expensive backup. Miami, Dallas, New England... Those three teams are in the middle in all looking at a different quarterback situations.
ddaryl Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 (edited) 9 minutes ago, BigBuff423 said: What's hilarious is that St. Louis, Philadelphia, and Minnesota are all on that list with the top player being the same guy: Sam Bradford. Wow....his agent must be a genius living on an island with some hot local talent bringing him cold drinks somewhere.....damn. bradford was the last 1st overall 1st rd draft pick before the Rookie salary cap was implemented which skews data some for the Rams ironically Bradford was traded to Philly for Nick Foles and some change back to St Louis Edited March 5, 2018 by ddaryl
boyst Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 8 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: It says choose carefully and spend wisely. When it comes to choosing, we've done more than anyone. Well, tied. We took 17 chances to find a starting quarterback to take us to the Super Bowl and win. If you went back to the Modern Age beginning of football, I'd say 95 or so you might find this to be a different Outlook. But still offer very little in conclusion
Malazan Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 lol, Brock Osweiler on there for 2 teams. What a colossal miss that was...
Hapless Bills Fan Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 30 minutes ago, BigBuff423 said: What's hilarious is that St. Louis, Philadelphia, and Minnesota are all on that list with the top player being the same guy: Sam Bradford. Wow....his agent must be a genius living on an island with some hot local talent bringing him cold drinks somewhere.....damn. IK right? Sam Bradford must also be way up there on the lifetime earnings list.....in addition to what he earned, his schnoz was all over the place in local St Louis television ads. 24 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: When it comes to choosing, we've done more than anyone. Well, tied. We took 17 chances to find a starting quarterback to take us to the Super Bowl and win. 17 chances to find a starting QB? How do you figure that? 1
Reed83HOF Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 29 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: When it comes to choosing, we've done more than anyone. Cleveland called looking for you...
RyanC883 Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 53 minutes ago, mattynh said: Bears at #5...ouch. Must be nice to be the Pats and be at #15....ridiculous salary cap cheating? na, the Pats*** would never cheat.
boyst Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 1 hour ago, Reed83HOF said: Cleveland called looking for you... The writing is small. I'm getting old. It's hard to read.
Reed83HOF Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 7 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: The writing is small. I'm getting old. It's hard to read. LOL
boyst Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 Just now, Reed83HOF said: LOL 17 is not less than 19. #fakenews #17livesmatter
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 ...better yet, look at OBD QB expenditures post Kelly....they're less than an Earl Scheib paint job (factor out stupid, desperation money in a few cases)....brings credence to you" get what you paid for" IMO........... 1
SouthNYfan Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 2 hours ago, jeremy2020 said: lol, Brock Osweiler on there for 2 teams. What a colossal miss that was... Leaves out that his contract was traded WITH a pick just to get the browns to take him!! Lolol They basically used cap space to buy a pick
Recommended Posts