Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’m tempted to start a thread that proclaims, “THE REAL STORY: HILLARY CLINTON WAS A PLANT FOR DONALD TRUMP IN THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.”

Its nearly as plausible. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Nanker said:

I’m tempted to start a thread that proclaims, “THE REAL STORY: HILLARY CLINTON WAS A PLANT FOR DONALD TRUMP IN THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.”

Its nearly as plausible. 

 

She was scheming to be Prez since the late 1960s, sat through a lousy marriage to a total snake to pursue her dream

 

Trump did this only because Obama dared him to

 

the irony, as always, is unfathomable

 

 

Posted (edited)
On ‎3‎/‎4‎/‎2018 at 7:28 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

I'll chime in with these thoughts... 

 

Clinton had plants in Trump's team, this is undeniable (to me) and I believe will soon become a matter of public record when the indictments begin in earnest. Manafort, and Papadopolous are all but confirmed to have been plants as both have much stronger ties to the Clintons and/or Fusion GPS than they ever did Trump. But Trump himself was not a plant.

 

How do we know?

 

They were spying on him - with the assistance of the FBI and USIC, breaking numerous laws in the process. Why risk so much to spy on him if he was a plant?

 

But hey, far be it for me to stop someone from doing their own bit of thinking and speculating. You do you, Pearl. :beer:  

I too will chime in.....

 

1) I think that Michael Moore unintentionally won the election for Trump with his famous viral video. He said that the rust belt voters would vote for President Trump and said that it will be "great."

 

2) Remember, Hillary did not even campaign in Wisconsin. This was very stupid of her.

 

3) Pearl is correct in that the Clintons are NOT democrats. They are like 2 thieves in the night, professional criminals and perhaps even murderers. She stole the nomination from Sanders. Ponder this if you will. She needed to steal the nomination from that old fool who along with his wife, has his own integrity issues.

 

4) The polls were totally contrived and blew up in the face of Crooked Hillary. She was all but a given to carry Wisc., Mich., Ohio, and Pennsylvania, no? Not only that, Barak Hussein Obama spent lots and lots of time in North Carolina to no avail. Voters might have thought that she was a lock and didn't turn out. Meanwhile, President Trump kept going from state to state.

 

5) Hillary talked too radical imo. She told the people of Flint, Michigan that their problems were police profiling and no body cams for police officers (who are lucky to find a police car for their shift. This in one of the most dangerous places in America.

 

In summary, I think that the Trump victory was not orchestrated by the Clintons. She failed on her own,  just like she did in 2008. If she runs in 2020 there will be even more scandals. The Clintons are kleptos and can't stop stealing.  And Hillary is simply vile.

 

Edited by Bill from NYC
spelling mistake
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Why thank you!!! :) This video was (imo) THE turning point of the election. I am just speculating of course but imo, Moore had zero idea that President Trump had any chance at all to win. So, he went ahead and made a great, practically tear inducing speech that had to have made an impact in key states.

 

 

8 minutes ago, Nanker said:

Props to you Bill. I know you don’t chime in much here. A voice of reason is refreshing to hear. 

:beer:

 

Edited by Bill from NYC
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Hilly should want to kill herself.  Pearl has proven that she encouraged The Donald to get into the race, but a funny thing happened on the way to the White House: she ended up losing to him.  She probably would have won otherwise. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Doc said:

Hilly should want to kill herself.  Pearl has proven that she encouraged The Donald to get into the race, but a funny thing happened on the way to the White House: she ended up losing to him.  She probably would have won otherwise. 

It's so sad how far Conservatives have fallen. Conservatives are now relying nonsensical conspiracy theories to full their core belief systems. The Republican Party is just a clown show. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

It's so sad how far Conservatives have fallen. Conservatives are now relying nonsensical conspiracy theories to full their core belief systems. The Republican Party is just a clown show. 

This kids is a classic case of projection.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

It's so sad how far Conservatives have fallen. Conservatives are now relying nonsensical conspiracy theories to full their core belief systems. The Republican Party is just a clown show. 

 

Huh?  I can assure you that no one cares about this "theory."  If anything, it shows just how incompetent Hilly and Slick were, inviting someone else to eat their lunch.

Posted

apparently Bill wagered $29,000 on Trump the day before Comey announced Hillary was again under investigation

 

 

Posted
8 hours ago, Bill from NYC said:

2) Remember, Hillary did not even campaign in Wisconsin. This was very stupid of her.

 

4) The polls were totally contrived and blew up in the face of Crooked Hillary. She was all but a given to carry Wisc., Mich., Ohio, and Pennsylvania, no? 

 

In summary, I think that the Trump victory was not orchestrated by the Clintons. She failed on her own,  just like she did in 2008. If she runs in 2020 there will be even more scandals. The Clintons are kleptos and can't stop stealing.  And Hillary is simply vile.

Hillary Clinton not campaigning in WI and MI enough is a common thing that the MSM always say.  However, had Hillary Clinton campaigned in WI and MI more she would have lost even by more votes.  And she knew it.  That's always been my opinion.  

 

We already know of two known Hillary Clinton plants from 2016.  Debbie Wasserman-Schultz as head of the DNC and Donna Brazile who succeeded Wasserman-Schultz as the DNC head.  Worse, Donna Brazile was a Clinton plant when she was working at MSNBC -this is when she got the debate questions for Hillary when she debated Bernie Sanders in MI.  I don't for a split second believe that it was only Wasserman-Schultz and Brazile that the Clintons had working for them.   I'm confident that the lying, scheming, thieving Clintons had plants in all media sources.

 

The 2016 Democratic Presidential nomination was stolen from Bernie Sanders by Bill and Hillary Clinton.

 

Do you people think that the Clintons would stop there?  Winning the Democratic nomination?

 

I don't.

 

The Clintons and Donald Trump are three peas in a pod.  But Wikileaks ruined their whole plan.

 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, Bill from NYC said:

Why thank you!!! :) This video was (imo) THE turning point of the election. I am just speculating of course but imo, Moore had zero idea that President Trump had any chance at all to win. So, he went ahead and made a great, practically tear inducing speech that had to have made an impact in key states.

 

 

 

That's as crazy as saying Russian ads on facebook swung the election.  I would say that every cable news network covering every Trump rally contributed a lot more in winning him the GOP nominee.  How much free advertising did he get again?

 

Moore has a great feel for the people in his hometown obviously.  Trump doesn't get enough credit for going to the left of Hillary on trade that probably pushed him over the edge in PA, MI, and WI to win him the presidency.

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, PearlHowardman said:

Hillary Clinton not campaigning in WI and MI enough is a common thing that the MSM always say.  However, had Hillary Clinton campaigned in WI and MI more she would have lost even by more votes.  And she knew it.  That's always been my opinion.  

 

We already know of two known Hillary Clinton plants from 2016.  Debbie Wasserman-Schultz as head of the DNC and Donna Brazile who succeeded Wasserman-Schultz as the DNC head.  Worse, Donna Brazile was a Clinton plant when she was working at MSNBC -this is when she got the debate questions for Hillary when she debated Bernie Sanders in MI.  I don't for a split second believe that it was only Wasserman-Schultz and Brazile that the Clintons had working for them.   I'm confident that the lying, scheming, thieving Clintons had plants in all media sources.

 

The 2016 Democratic Presidential nomination was stolen from Bernie Sanders by Bill and Hillary Clinton.

 

Do you people think that the Clintons would stop there?  Winning the Democratic nomination?

 

I don't.

 

The Clintons and Donald Trump are three peas in a pod.  But Wikileaks ruined their whole plan.

 

You realize that Hilly was promised the Dem nomination when she stepped aside for Barry in 2008, right?  Of course everyone was in cahoots for her.  Except for Bernie that is.   

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, PearlHowardman said:

No automatic alt text available.

 

okay Pearl, I'll play Devils Advocate here.  Assuming that you're not BSC and Trump was planted by the Clinton campaign to assure Her Royal Majesty's election.  That does not alter the reality that Donald Trump was elected President

 

So now I ask, how has Hiliary Clinton's fall guy been any worse of a President than Hiliary would have been?

Posted
13 hours ago, PearlHowardman said:

Hillary Clinton not campaigning in WI and MI enough is a common thing that the MSM always say.  However, had Hillary Clinton campaigned in WI and MI more she would have lost even by more votes.  And she knew it.  That's always been my opinion.  

 

We already know of two known Hillary Clinton plants from 2016.  Debbie Wasserman-Schultz as head of the DNC and Donna Brazile who succeeded Wasserman-Schultz as the DNC head.  Worse, Donna Brazile was a Clinton plant when she was working at MSNBC -this is when she got the debate questions for Hillary when she debated Bernie Sanders in MI.  I don't for a split second believe that it was only Wasserman-Schultz and Brazile that the Clintons had working for them.   I'm confident that the lying, scheming, thieving Clintons had plants in all media sources.

 

The 2016 Democratic Presidential nomination was stolen from Bernie Sanders by Bill and Hillary Clinton.

 

Do you people think that the Clintons would stop there?  Winning the Democratic nomination?

 

I don't.

 

The Clintons and Donald Trump are three peas in a pod.  But Wikileaks ruined their whole plan.

 

 

I have no issues with your entire post until the last sentence.  I find the first 2 paragraph to be quite interesting and thought provoking. Lots of interesting theories in this thread.

12 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

That's as crazy as saying Russian ads on facebook swung the election.  I would say that every cable news network covering every Trump rally contributed a lot more in winning him the GOP nominee.  How much free advertising did he get again?

 

Moore has a great feel for the people in his hometown obviously.  Trump doesn't get enough credit for going to the left of Hillary on trade that probably pushed him over the edge in PA, MI, and WI to win him the presidency.

 

 

Yes DB put I think (not sure) that this speech was given in Ohio. He mentioned the auto workers specifically and praised President Trump from the onset of his talk.  Moore (as I'm sure you know) won a lot of Rust Belt hearts a long time ago from "Roger and Me." He HAD to know that he was getting votes for President Trump.

 

PS: After the elections he all but called for civil disobedience in an attempt to win back his radical base.

11 hours ago, PearlHowardman said:

No automatic alt text available.

Are you suggesting that you believe the polls?

 

Posted
55 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Seems to me that the poll shows that every time Trump was getting close to Hillary, an all out spin by the media occurred 

All it took is for him to have two scoops of ice cream or ketchup on a well done steak.

×
×
  • Create New...