Tiberius Posted March 4, 2018 Posted March 4, 2018 45 minutes ago, PearlHowardman said: Wrong! Donald Trump intentionally diverted the news media attention away from the now Wikileaks proven "crooked" Hillary Clinton and the rigging of her nomination from Bernie Sanders. Then to follow up, Trump engaged the father of a fallen US soldier who was Muslim. This went on for a week. The news media was excoriating Trump. So, his intentional news media diversion worked. What Donald Trump should have done was simply point out that there is now Wikileaks proof that Hillary Clinton is proven to be "crooked" and her nomination was proven to be rigged. Donald Trump had overtaken Hillary Clinton in Nate Silver's election model. Nate Silver was a political God to Democrats. Democrats were s****ing bricks but in comes Donald Trump to save the day for them. Intentionally! It was a Bill and Hillary Clinton scam. Not Donald Trump. You don't think Trump could have thrown the election better than that? If he really wanted to lose he could have done a better job of it, like saying he wanted to ban all guns. Boom, that would have been game over for him 1
3rdnlng Posted March 4, 2018 Posted March 4, 2018 1 hour ago, PearlHowardman said: Wrong! Donald Trump intentionally diverted the news media attention away from the now Wikileaks proven "crooked" Hillary Clinton and the rigging of her nomination from Bernie Sanders. Then to follow up, Trump engaged the father of a fallen US soldier who was Muslim. This went on for a week. The news media was excoriating Trump. So, his intentional news media diversion worked. What Donald Trump should have done was simply point out that there is now Wikileaks proof that Hillary Clinton is proven to be "crooked" and her nomination was proven to be rigged. Donald Trump had overtaken Hillary Clinton in Nate Silver's election model. Nate Silver was a political God to Democrats. Democrats were s****ing bricks but in comes Donald Trump to save the day for them. Intentionally! It was a Bill and Hillary Clinton scam. Not Donald Trump. You are now just expressing your opinion again. The same opinion you expressed to start this thread. You have provided no facts, only other people's opinions from 18 months ago. Saying something over and over again does not make it true. When you stated that you were considering starting this thread I cautioned you about being willing to do the research first to give your theory at least a basis of fact. Well, you haven't done that and your little theory sucks.
/dev/null Posted March 4, 2018 Posted March 4, 2018 2 hours ago, PearlHowardman said: Gawd those 90s hair styles are awful. And yes, admit it. We all had those hairdos 1
Doc Posted March 4, 2018 Posted March 4, 2018 1 hour ago, PearlHowardman said: Wrong! Donald Trump intentionally diverted the news media attention away from the now Wikileaks proven "crooked" Hillary Clinton and the rigging of her nomination from Bernie Sanders. Then to follow up, Trump engaged the father of a fallen US soldier who was Muslim. This went on for a week. The news media was excoriating Trump. So, his intentional news media diversion worked. What Donald Trump should have done was simply point out that there is now Wikileaks proof that Hillary Clinton is proven to be "crooked" and her nomination was proven to be rigged. Donald Trump had overtaken Hillary Clinton in Nate Silver's election model. Nate Silver was a political God to Democrats. Democrats were s****ing bricks but in comes Donald Trump to save the day for them. Intentionally! It was a Bill and Hillary Clinton scam. Not Donald Trump. He "intentionally diverted the news media"? Because they were all set to go after Hilly and her just-proven crookedness? And the MSM previously never took anything he said and blew it out of proportion? LOL! The Donald had been calling her crooked for months. The Wikileaks thing just proved what he was saying so it was "ho hum." The MSM had no desire/wasn't going to pursue it for obvious reasons but had every reason to jump on the joke he was making about finding her (other) emails, something the MSM should have been trying to do since day 1 but didn't (again, for obvious reasons). But again, I'll allow that the Clintons might have had an agreement, or at least thought they had one, initially with The Donald. But again, it looks like he played her for a fool, just like the DNC did back in 2008. And maybe he also colluded with Russia to win the election. But the biggest question now is: do you think he's still colluding with them?
Chef Jim Posted March 4, 2018 Posted March 4, 2018 1 minute ago, /dev/null said: Gawd those 90s hair styles are awful. And yes, admit it. We all had those hairdos Ummmm no. I didn't not have a hairdo. I had hairstyle.
/dev/null Posted March 4, 2018 Posted March 4, 2018 47 minutes ago, row_33 said: Even the Sore/Loserman ticket had to give up by the day of W’s inauguration what did Hillary tell Al Gore after he lost, did she gloat? Gore and Hiliary reportedly had a frosty relationship and I would not put it past Hiliary to have gloated in 2000. If she did, I would love to know what Gore said to Hiliary in 2016.
row_33 Posted March 4, 2018 Posted March 4, 2018 26 minutes ago, /dev/null said: Gore and Hiliary reportedly had a frosty relationship and I would not put it past Hiliary to have gloated in 2000. If she did, I would love to know what Gore said to Hiliary in 2016. Hope Al was behind bulletproof glass for his comment, her high-dudgeon glare could pierce that easily
Deranged Rhino Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 I'll chime in with these thoughts... Clinton had plants in Trump's team, this is undeniable (to me) and I believe will soon become a matter of public record when the indictments begin in earnest. Manafort, and Papadopolous are all but confirmed to have been plants as both have much stronger ties to the Clintons and/or Fusion GPS than they ever did Trump. But Trump himself was not a plant. How do we know? They were spying on him - with the assistance of the FBI and USIC, breaking numerous laws in the process. Why risk so much to spy on him if he was a plant? But hey, far be it for me to stop someone from doing their own bit of thinking and speculating. You do you, Pearl. 1
KD in CA Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 On 3/3/2018 at 6:22 PM, row_33 said: We don’t get 8 years of her doing that arms wide clap and then making that goofy face and pointing out to nobody in particular in the audience..... She might be the phoniest person in human history. I mean seriously, name someone who has ever acted more phony than what you just described. It's kind of amazing how absolutely nothing rubbed off after spending decades with Slick Willy.
Azalin Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 12 hours ago, /dev/null said: Gawd those 90s hair styles are awful. And yes, admit it. We all had those hairdos Not me - I had lost so much hair by then that I was shaving my head by '98. 6 minutes ago, KD in CA said: She might be the phoniest person in human history. I mean seriously, name someone who has ever acted more phony than what you just described. Are you suggesting that she might not have been sincere in her claim that she had been a lifelong Yankees fan? 1
row_33 Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Azalin said: Not me - I had lost so much hair by then that I was shaving my head by '98. Are you suggesting that she might not have been sincere in her claim that she had been a lifelong Yankees fan? Hillary always said she was a lifelong Cubs fan until she carpetbagged the NY Senate seat Edited March 5, 2018 by row_33
Azalin Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, row_33 said: Hillary always said she was a lifelong Cubs fan until she carpetbagged the NY Senate seat Is "facetious" not a part of the Canadian lexicon?
row_33 Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 1 hour ago, Azalin said: Is "facetious" not a part of the Canadian lexicon? Eh? 1
Doc Brown Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 5 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: I'll chime in with these thoughts... Clinton had plants in Trump's team, this is undeniable (to me) and I believe will soon become a matter of public record when the indictments begin in earnest. Manafort, and Papadopolous are all but confirmed to have been plants as both have much stronger ties to the Clintons and/or Fusion GPS than they ever did Trump. But Trump himself was not a plant. How do we know? They were spying on him - with the assistance of the FBI and USIC, breaking numerous laws in the process. Why risk so much to spy on him if he was a plant? But hey, far be it for me to stop someone from doing their own bit of thinking and speculating. You do you, Pearl. If the spying theory does come to fruition in sports terms it would be like the Clinton team (Patriots organization) illegally taping the Rams walk through before the Superbowl, but instead of the game winning Vinatieri field goal the Rams blocked it and ran it back for a touchdown. 1
Azalin Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 1 hour ago, row_33 said: Eh? That's aboot what I expected....
3rdnlng Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 4 hours ago, Azalin said: Not me - I had lost so much hair by then that I was shaving my head by '98. Are you suggesting that she might not have been sincere in her claim that she had been a lifelong Yankees fan? You mean, this isn't the voice of a Yankees fan? https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=hillary+southern+accent+speech&view=detail&mid=E40DFE592A089AC1C6BAE40DFE592A089AC1C6BA&FORM=VIRE 1
/dev/null Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 4 hours ago, Doc Brown said: If the spying theory does come to fruition in sports terms it would be like the Clinton team (Patriots organization) illegally taping the Rams walk through before the Superbowl, but instead of the game winning Vinatieri field goal the Rams blocked it and ran it back for a touchdown. Followed by an unhinged Madden and Summerall trying to explain (more to themselves than the viewer) how that happened and ESPN spends the entire off season talking about how the Patriots* really won
Tiberius Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 So it was Hillary in the library with the candlestick who gave us Trump? Ok!
Azalin Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 5 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: You mean, this isn't the voice of a Yankees fan? https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=hillary+southern+accent+speech&view=detail&mid=E40DFE592A089AC1C6BAE40DFE592A089AC1C6BA&FORM=VIRE To this very day, that still makes me cringe. "I ain't in no ways tard....."
row_33 Posted March 5, 2018 Posted March 5, 2018 7 hours ago, Azalin said: That's aboot what I expected.... Half our identity derived the worst swear words from basic Roman Catholic terms....
Recommended Posts