3rdnlng Posted April 7, 2018 Posted April 7, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, PearlHowardman said: No, I'm not crusading. Moreover, I have links to credible sources and a chart with credible events, dates, and polling numbers. Hey, where is DerangedRhino? I'm still waiting for him to confirm (the obvious) that both Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Donna Brazile were Hillary Clinton plants in 2016. Wikileaks exposed both of them and they were forced to resign from their positions at the DNC. Or does DerangedRhino not like being upstaged by me? DerangedRhino is going after the little plants like Manafort while I have the biggest Hillary Clinton plant of them all - President Donald Trump! Don't be an ass. Last I heard he was in Scotland, sipping tea, through his nostrils. Edited April 7, 2018 by 3rdnlng
Deranged Rhino Posted April 7, 2018 Posted April 7, 2018 18 hours ago, PearlHowardman said: No, I'm not crusading. Moreover, I have links to credible sources and a chart with credible events, dates, and polling numbers. Hey, where is DerangedRhino? I'm still waiting for him to confirm (the obvious) that both Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Donna Brazile were Hillary Clinton plants in 2016. Wikileaks exposed both of them and they were forced to resign from their positions at the DNC. Or does DerangedRhino not like being upstaged by me? DerangedRhino is going after the little plants like Manafort while I have the biggest Hillary Clinton plant of them all - President Donald Trump! Youre 18 months behind the curve... 1
DC Tom Posted April 7, 2018 Posted April 7, 2018 29 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Youre 18 months behind the curve... Well, that's a new misspelling at least... 1
Deranged Rhino Posted April 7, 2018 Posted April 7, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Well, that's a new misspelling at least... Mobile doesn't like punctuation on you're. It's almost like Siri knows I'm trying to kill her.
PearlHowardman Posted April 10, 2018 Author Posted April 10, 2018 On 4/7/2018 at 4:40 PM, Deranged Rhino said: Youre 18 months behind the curve... I don't recall you posting anything about Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Donna Brazile being Hillary Clinton plants. They were publicly exposed via Wikileaks and lost their jobs with the DNC. So far your March DOJ IG report is late I also don't recall any feedback from you regarding the "When Polls Get Close, Trump Says The Craziest Things" 2016 US Presidential election chart, either. 3rdning won't talk about it even though I asked him/her to dispute the chart dates, events, and polling numbers. The chart is 100% credible. Donald Trump's 2016 Presidential candidacy was not credible.
Tiberius Posted April 10, 2018 Posted April 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, PearlHowardman said: I don't recall you posting anything about Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Donna Brazile being Hillary Clinton plants. They were publicly exposed via Wikileaks and lost their jobs with the DNC. So far your March DOJ IG report is late I also don't recall any feedback from you regarding the "When Polls Get Close, Trump Says The Craziest Things" 2016 US Presidential election chart, either. 3rdning won't talk about it even though I asked him/her to dispute the chart dates, events, and polling numbers. The chart is 100% credible. Donald Trump's 2016 Presidential candidacy was not credible. Hannity was just making fun of the Horowitz report! Ya sure, he said, it will come out soon, ya sure! Lol, Hannity!
/dev/null Posted April 10, 2018 Posted April 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Hannity was just making fun of the Horowitz report! Ya sure, he said, it will come out soon, ya sure! Lol, Hannity! Further advancing my belief that the only people who watch the likes of Hannity or Maddow are Kool-Aid drinking partisan shills looking for either self re-enforcement or something to upset them
Tiberius Posted April 10, 2018 Posted April 10, 2018 8 minutes ago, /dev/null said: Further advancing my belief that the only people who watch the likes of Hannity or Maddow are Kool-Aid drinking partisan shills looking for either self re-enforcement or something to upset them Yes, but you think that about any media source, right? What media sources do you endorse as pure and honest? I'm guessing you would never have the guts to admit what you watch, read or listen to. How say you, Toad?
/dev/null Posted April 10, 2018 Posted April 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Yes, but you think that about any media source, right? What media sources do you endorse as pure and honest? I'm guessing you would never have the guts to admit what you watch, read or listen to. How say you, Toad? i don't endorse any as pure and honest some of my regulars pilotonline goerie hampton roads local channels erie local channels aggregate news sites like Drudge and RealClear commentary from Reason and i wash it all down with a chuckle from The Onion
3rdnlng Posted April 10, 2018 Posted April 10, 2018 22 minutes ago, PearlHowardman said: I don't recall you posting anything about Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Donna Brazile being Hillary Clinton plants. They were publicly exposed via Wikileaks and lost their jobs with the DNC. So far your March DOJ IG report is late I also don't recall any feedback from you regarding the "When Polls Get Close, Trump Says The Craziest Things" 2016 US Presidential election chart, either. 3rdning won't talk about it even though I asked him/her to dispute the chart dates, events, and polling numbers. The chart is 100% credible. Donald Trump's 2016 Presidential candidacy was not credible. ,I dispute your interpretation of your "chart dates, events and polling numbers". You keep posting the sameshit over and over. You're crusading and I'm not going down your rabbit hole with you.
DC Tom Posted April 10, 2018 Posted April 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: ,I dispute your interpretation of your "chart dates, events and polling numbers". You keep posting the sameshit over and over. You're crusading and I'm not going down your rabbit hole with you. Standing outside the rabbit hole shouting "I'm not following you down there!" isn't much better, really.
snafu Posted April 10, 2018 Posted April 10, 2018 Yeah, just roll a big rock over the opening to the hole.
Tiberius Posted April 10, 2018 Posted April 10, 2018 7 minutes ago, /dev/null said: i don't endorse any as pure and honest some of my regulars pilotonline goerie hampton roads local channels erie local channels aggregate news sites like Drudge and RealClear commentary from Reason and i wash it all down with a chuckle from The Onion I was stationed at Langley
/dev/null Posted April 10, 2018 Posted April 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I was stationed at Langley 1
Wacka Posted April 10, 2018 Posted April 10, 2018 9 hours ago, Tiberius said: I was stationed at Langley Yeah, cleaning toilets.
Tiberius Posted April 10, 2018 Posted April 10, 2018 27 minutes ago, Wacka said: Yeah, cleaning toilets. I did some of that, yes
PearlHowardman Posted April 11, 2018 Author Posted April 11, 2018 (edited) On 4/9/2018 at 10:15 PM, 3rdnlng said: ,I dispute your interpretation of your "chart dates, events and polling numbers". You keep posting the sameshit over and over. You're crusading and I'm not going down your rabbit hole with you. If you dispute them, let's hear your dispute. If you have a different interpretation of factual dates, factual events, and factual polling numbers - let's hear it. PA-18 Update: http://www.post-gazette.com/news/politics-nation/2018/04/02/Conor-Lamb-Allegheny-County-election-results-certified-winner-congressional-seat/stories/201804020086 Finally official: Conor Lamb certified winner of congressional seat The last county left to certify its election results for Pennsylvania's 18th Congressional District did so Monday morning, leaving no more obstacles separating (Democrat) Conor Lamb and his seat in the U.S. House. The certification is the final step in officially declaring Mr. Lamb the winner of the March 13 special election, which was to fill the vacancy left by former Rep. Tim Murphy's resignation last year. Mr. Lamb's victory on election night -- by a margin of just hundreds of votes -- was marred by uncertainty for more than a week as his Republican opponent, Rick Saccone, waited for military and overseas ballots to be counted. Allegheny ended up being the most significant in Mr. Lamb's 755-vote win, favoring him by about 15,000 votes. Edited April 11, 2018 by PearlHowardman
3rdnlng Posted April 11, 2018 Posted April 11, 2018 35 minutes ago, PearlHowardman said: If you dispute them, let's hear your dispute. If you have a different interpretation of factual dates, factual events, and factual polling numbers - let's hear it. PA-18 Update: http://www.post-gazette.com/news/politics-nation/2018/04/02/Conor-Lamb-Allegheny-County-election-results-certified-winner-congressional-seat/stories/201804020086 Finally official: Conor Lamb certified winner of congressional seat The last county left to certify its election results for Pennsylvania's 18th Congressional District did so Monday morning, leaving no more obstacles separating (Democrat) Conor Lamb and his seat in the U.S. House. The certification is the final step in officially declaring Mr. Lamb the winner of the March 13 special election, which was to fill the vacancy left by former Rep. Tim Murphy's resignation last year. Mr. Lamb's victory on election night -- by a margin of just hundreds of votes -- was marred by uncertainty for more than a week as his Republican opponent, Rick Saccone, waited for military and overseas ballots to be counted. Allegheny ended up being the most significant in Mr. Lamb's 755-vote win, favoring him by about 15,000 votes. You are one obtuse individual. I've already stated that I'll accept your dates, etc. because I don't give a !@#$. It's your interpretation that sucks. Trump doesn't "throw" anything. It doesn't matter whether it's cards, golf or chess, he wants to beat your butt. Your speculation that Trump did his level best to give the election to Hillary goes against his very nature and is laughable. So, quit re-gifting your same oldshit and go find another path to nowhere to follow.
PearlHowardman Posted April 13, 2018 Author Posted April 13, 2018 On 4/11/2018 at 8:29 AM, 3rdnlng said: You are one obtuse individual. I've already stated that I'll accept your dates, etc. because I don't give a !@#$. It's your interpretation that sucks. Trump doesn't "throw" anything. It doesn't matter whether it's cards, golf or chess, he wants to beat your butt. Your speculation that Trump did his level best to give the election to Hillary goes against his very nature and is laughable. So, quit re-gifting your same oldshit and go find another path to nowhere to follow. Bill Clinton Calls Donald Trump To Congratulate Him On Winning The 2016 Presidential Election: Bill Clinton: "Hello, Donald. I'm just calling you to congratulate you. You won the election. Congratulations." Donald Trump: "Are you f***ing serious? This wasn't the outcome you and I talked about." Bill Clinton: "I know, Donald. I know. It was that damn Wikileaks. Without them you would have certainly lost the election like you were supposed to." Donald Trump: "I did everything I could possibly do to lose this election. I sure as s**t hope we don't get exposed.." Bill Clinton: "Well, there could be a slight problem. The telephone call that I made to you before you announced that you were running for President. Remember that?" Donald Trump: "You mean when you called me and told me I should play a bigger role in the Republican party and focus on Republican base voters? That call? What about it?" Bill Clinton: "Well, the media got a hold of it and there's a couple of news articles that everyone can easily see. And there's more." Donald Trump: "What? The media knows about the call you made to me? And what else is there?" Bill Clinton: "Well, there's also this chart out there on the internet. It's titled "When Polls Get Close, Trump Says The Craziest Things" and it charts 2016 polling numbers between you and Hillary. The chart also shows dates and events where, like the chart title says, you said the craziest things when polls between you and Hillary got close. And then you went down in the polls against Hillary. For example, the chart shows the end of July 2016 when you polled ahead of Hillary for the first time. Right after that, Wikileaks exposed DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz for favoring Hillary over Bernie Sanders in the Democrat primary. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz was forced to resign her position as DNC Chair. That should have been devastating for Hillary and a huge boon to you. But you saved Hillary by immediately changing the subject. You came out of nowhere and asked Russia to release all the e-mail that they supposedly had from Hillary. Then you even changed the subject again, going after the father of a dead Muslim soldier. I mean, to me it was brilliant what you did - the media excoriated you and forgot about Hillary. You tanked in new polls and Hillary surpassed you. And there it is in the chart for everyone to see." Donald Trump: "Holy s**t! Anyone with an ounce of common sense will conclude that I was a Hillary Clinton plant in the election, based on our telephone conversation and the chart you mentined." Bill Clinton: "You're right, Donald. But I have a plan to keep the media away." Donald Trump: "What's your plan, Bill?" Bill Clinton: "Donald, when you become President you need to behave in a crazy way, similar to what you did during your fake Presidential campaign. When you become President you need to run your White House chaotically. You know, fire cabinet members. Release some bizarre tweets. Keep firing and hiring White House staff." Donald Trump: "Sounds like a good plan, Bill. Do you think it will work?" Bill Clinton: "Hey, they don't call me slick Willie for nothing. And I know what "is" is. Ha ha ha ha ha..." Donald Trump: "And you're married to crooked Hillary. You're both pathological liars. Ha ha ha ha ha..." Bill Clinton: "And you're the third pathological liar here. Talk to you later, Donald." Donald Trump: "Talk to you later, Bill."
Recommended Posts